Categories

Above the Fold

Is Health Care a Right?

I have to admit I often have found the language of health care “rights” off-putting.  Yet the idea of health care as a “right” is usually pitted against the idea of health care as a “privilege.” Given that choice, I’ll circle “right” every time.

Still, when people claim something as a “right,” they often sound shrill and demanding. Then someone comes along to remind us that people who have “rights” also have “responsibilities,” and the next thing you know, we’re off and running in the debate about health care as a “right” vs. health care as a matter of “individual responsibility.”

As regular readers know, I believe that when would-be reformers emphasize “individual responsibilities,” they shift the burden to the poorest and sickest among us. The numbers are irrefutable: low-income people are far more likely than other Americans to become obese, smoke, drink to excess and abuse drugs,  in part because a healthy lifestyle is  expensive, and in part because the stress of being poor—and “having little control over your life”—leads many to self-medicate. (For evidence and the full argument, see this recent post).  This is a major reason why the poor are sicker than the rest of us, and die prematurely of treatable conditions.

Those conservatives and libertarians who put such emphasis on “individual responsibility” are saying, in effect, that low-income families should learn to take care of themselves.Continue reading…

Presidential candidates on health care

As CEO of Harvard Pilgrim, I find I do a fair amount of public speaking.  Over the past ten days or so, I’ve been on several panels with a variety of public policy, health policy and industry types.  We also represented a pretty broad collection of political philosophies – some Democrats, some Republicans, some liberals, some moderates and some conservatives.

What really struck me, though, was the amount of cross-over support several policy ideas had in the “what do we need to do about health care” arena.  To listen to the media, one would conclude there is no common ground between the parties on this issue – and, frankly, a lot of the stuff the people I was with were talking about hasn’t really showed up on the national debate scene at all.

So – at the risk of over-simplifying what my fellow panelists and I talked about during these discussions – I’d offer up these four national policy ideas – all of which seemed to have pretty broad ideological support.

Continue reading…

Economic stress — bad for your health

Stress due to the economic downturn is causing more of us to be irritable, angry, sleepless, and self-medicating through food.

And stress in the workplace is costing business $300 billion a year, according to the American Psychological Association (APA), due to the loss of productivity, absenteeism, turnover and increased medical costs.

The APA completed its survey, Stress in America, in August 2008 — more than a month ago, well before yesterday’s biggest stock market fall in 4 years.

The APA warns that the levels of stress felt by Americans due to the financial downturn can wreak significant havoc on health. 46% of Americans are now worried about providing for their families’ basic needs. One can imagine this number will be much higher based on the past few weeks’ financial events.

Continue reading…

Shout out to Adam Singer, physician entrepreneur of the year

Adamsinger

Modern Physician just named Adam Singer, the founder of IPC — The Hospitalist Company, its first annual Physician Entrepreneur of the Year. Adam and I don’t always see eye to eye, but I want to congratulate him and highlight some of his contributions.

When the hospitalist field launched in the mid-1990s, Adam was there – I recall seeing him at virtually every hospitalist-related meeting during the early years. He struck me as a bit awkward – maybe a tad insecure – but he was brimming with passion and a near-religious fervor for the hospitalist concept. He had just started his company, whose business was to organize hospitalist programs and place them in hospitals, first in So Cal, and later in other regions. In essence, IPC was really the first “rent” (vs. buy) hospitalist solution, and it quickly found a market niche.

Adam’s vision was unique and deeply held. He frequently scolded me for what he called an overly traditional and “academic” view of what a “real hospitalist” should be. To his way of thinking, hospitalists should be relentless managers of the inpatient stay, less about traditional views of physicianship and more about driving teams and technology to make hospitalizations more efficient and increase adherence to practice standards.

The use of technology was critical to Adam’s ability to bring his vision to fruition. Adam had a fundamental problem to solve: he needed data to run his business, but getting information from all of his client hospitals was nearly impossible. As Adam once told me, “if I need to get clinical and billing data from each hospital, I’d be spending all my time in hospital IT meetings.” So he built IPC’s infrastructure around home-grown handheld devices that allowed his hospitalists to collect detailed patient data; the devices synced up with a central data repository daily. Not only did this give IPC the ability to measure and articulate their value to client hospitals, but it gave Adam – a self-described control freak – a detailed window into the daily practice of dozens, later hundreds, of his hospitalists without having to leave his North Hollywood office. I remember him demonstrating the system to me one day, including the tough, sometimes boorish notes he would tear off to those docs who seemed to be underperforming. It wasn’t my idea of an attractive management style, but one couldn’t doubt his commitment to his vision and his ability to disseminate this vision across an increasingly vast enterprise.

Perhaps most impressively, Adam focused like a laser on post-discharge care, well before it was fashionable. At a time when few saw the business case to do this, Adam developed a sophisticated (and expensive) system of post-discharge follow-up phone calls, aided by his handheld technology system. He found that, by calling every patient soon after discharge, his nurses were often able to troubleshoot and avoid unnecessary re-hospitalizations or harm. “All part of our value equation,” he told me when I asked him how he could afford to do this, and there was no doubt that it was a marketplace differentiator for IPC. Today, everybody is thinking about readmission rates and filling the post-discharge black hole. Adam was all over it a decade ago.

I’ve had my disagreements with Adam over the years, and continue to harbor concerns about some aspects of IPC’s clinical and business model. I also wondered whether he would suffer “Founder’s Syndrome” – he has the kind of high energy, confrontational personality that is perfect for the early, free-wheeling days of a start-up, but sometimes gets shoved aside when the company matures, replaced by a smoother consensus-builder. To Adam’s credit, that hasn’t happened, in part because he is a great judge of talent, bringing in others who have played Robert Gates to Adam’s Rumsfeld.

And you can’t argue with success. IPC’s net revenue now exceeds $200M/year. And last year his company became the first hospitalist enterprise to go public, earning he and his shareholders considerable wealth (which they have retained, despite the market conditions). Others will doubtless follow, but this event was external validation of Adam’s leadership and, more broadly, the hospitalist idea.

So hats off to Dr. Adam Singer, Physician Entrepreneur of the Year. Whatever one thinks of his unusual style, there is little doubt that Adam has been as responsible for the growth of the hospitalist field as anyone.

Google Health: Is It Good For You?

By AMY TENDERICHAmy_small

Note: Amy Tenderich, who writes and maintains the wonderful Diabetes Mine,
just did this very illuminating interview with Google Health’s Missy
Krassner.  As you’ll see, she doesn’t slow-pitch to Missy. This is a
sure-footed, tough-minded exchange about the real issues that are on
the table now in Health 2.0. – Brian Klepper

Slowly but surely, using the Internet for your health needs is
becoming as mainstream as shopping on the web: no longer futuristic,
but is it for everyone?  And perhaps more importantly, are mainstream
commercial health platforms from companies like Google and Microsoft
really useful for people with specific chronic illnesses?  I thought it
would be interesting to hear their side of the story.

Missykrasner_3
So please welcome Missy Krasner, Product Marketing Manager for Google Health, whom I was lucky enough to catch up with for an interview last week.

Missy, shortly after Google Health launched last Spring, David Kibbe, former Director of Health IT for the AAFP, noted
that most of its services were “only mildly useful and sort of
‘toyish.’” How have these services evolved to be more useful to people
with health conditions?

Continue reading…

Everyday Health & Revolution Health merger staying in 1.0

Everyday Health and Revolution Health have announced their merger, creating a consumer health Web site designed to challenge WebMD. The new company will operate under the name Waterfront Media.

There’s no doubt that they will get a lot of consumer traffic to their network of sites. One of the things that remains unclear for both Waterfront and WebMD is to what extent they will serve primarily as reference sources versus playing a greater role in consumers’ own health management. The answer may very well lie in the degree to which they provide information therapy (Ix), not just health information.

As 1.0 as it is, there’s certainly no shame in being a valuable reference tool. I’m a big fan of information democratization. But it’s impact on care management has limitations.

Continue reading…

Online cancer resources invaluable for empowering parents of sick children

Five years ago, when many pediatric hospitals were unaware of or
unwilling to
acknowledge the capacities of online medical support
groups, my thirteen-year-old daughter was diagnosed with a subset of a
rare cancer (sarcoma or soft tissue cancer).

It was clear from the outset that California lacked the expertise
for correct diagnosis, to say nothing of the specialist teams
recommended for best practices. Misdiagnosis and errors in treatment
are the rule rather than the exception for sarcomas. Survival rates
remain at about 50%. The AYA (adolescent and young adult) population
has the highest mortality rate from cancer, in part due to sarcomas,
which comprise up to 20% of pediatric cancers.

Guided by a sophisticated ACOR (Assn. of Online Cancer Resources) list whose members were at ease with PubMed, the NCI sites
and more, we blasted our way from one bumbling pediatric institution to
another. Our physician teams of self proclaimed experts practically
went into cardiac arrest.

Continue reading…

Single-payer folks still determined

John McCain would never endorse it, and Barack Obama’s plan carefully steered away from it, but the proponents of a single-payer national health care plan are as determined, and hopeful, as ever to bring it the U.S.Conyers

Congressman John Conyers of Michigan, who introduced HR 676, the United States National Health Insurance Act, to Congress in 2003, isn’t giving up. Under his plan, a single agency would organize health financing — cutting out the insurance companies as the middle men — but health care delivery itself would be mostly private.

On Sept. 19, single-payer advocates gathered at the 1199/SEIU building in midtown Manhattan to honor Conyers as he received a lifetime achievement award from members of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP). He concluded his speech with a quote from Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane."

Conyers spoke to me that evening about how he thinks a national health care plan is inevitable – because every other plan has led the country into dead ends. Click here to listen to the interview.

The single-payer advocates gathered that evening were also celebrating the release of PNHP’s new book, "10 Excellent Reasons for National Health Care."

I spoke with the editors, Mary E. O’Brien, M.D., and Martha Livingston, PHD, about the book and their views on McCain and Obama’s health care plans. Click here to listen to Dr. O’Brien and Dr. Livingston.

Around the Web in 60 Seconds (Or Less)

iHealthBeat: The
Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel is seeking comments
on six draft interoperability specifications designed to support the
electronic exchange of health information, Health Data Management reports.

Academic medicine representatives told the Medicare Payment Advisory
Commission that medical education training needs to move into the 21st
century by focusing on IT adoption, and other clinical outcomes and quality measures, Modern Healthcare reports.

California fails to reprimand and revoke licenses of registered nurses with criminal pasts, including multiple felony convictions, ProPublica reports.

A McCain aide has said the presidential candidate would be for his health plan by cutting back the Medicare and Medicaid programs, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Health 2.0 NorthEast mixer TONIGHT in Cambridge, MA 

The Health 2.0 gang in the Boston area (they call themselves “North-east,” but that’s Yankee imperialism) is having a stellar networking evening on October 7 at the Marriott in Cambridge, MA. Steve Wardell, Peter Mueller, Vince Caprio & Mark Modzelewski have put together a great evening.The line up includes:Ben Heywood, Co-Founder, PatientsLikeMeAaron Day, Chairman & CEO, Tangerine WellnessStan Nowak, President, SilverlinkMatthew Jarman, VP, Corporate Development, American WellJack Barrette, Founder and CEO of WegoHealthRobert Reid, President of Endovascular ForumModerator: Wade Roush, Chief Correspondent for XconomyBut of course the real action will be the networking and discussions before and after the event. Indu & I were at the first one back in January, and it was just an excellent evening.If you’re anywhere close to Boston you should make a point of being there. For more details and to get tickets (they’re cheap and include an open bar!) go to http://www.healthforum2.com/And if you need help setting up your own local Health 2.0 “chapter”, we in the “mother ship” are happy to help in any way we can.And of course don’t forget that this is all a little teaser for the main event in San Francisco, October 22-23 http://www.health2con.com

assetto corsa mods