Later this year I am in front of the MPTS/GMC for a complaint by the MPTS, that applied for a non-medical job and despite not having to make disclosures, I made disclosures during a non-medical employment enquiry during the pandemic. But the MPTS/GMC accusation is despite evidence they provide of disclosures that I have not made them and despite no application form they are adamant I made an application form. Which is a probity issues.
Later this year I am in front of the MPTS/GMC for a complaint by the MPTS, that applied for a non-medical job and despite not having to make disclosures, I made disclosures during a non-medical employment enquiry during the pandemic. But the MPTS/GMC accusation is despite evidence they provide of disclosures that I have not made them and despite no application form they are adamant I made an application form. Which is a probity issues.
I notice your article https://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2022/05/27/british-doctor-suspended-for-falsely-claiming-she-was-promised-a-laptop-wtf/ I would very much like to use this as part of an end argument with the MPTS considering their own complainant. Can I ask were in the Magna Carta is it reference the vague fuck off text.
Many thanks, Dr Ali (not working as a doctor and trying to leave the profession)