There’s been quite a fuss about the recent study showing that bankruptcy is frequently caused by high health care bills, or at least by the inability of those who are sick to return to work and pay off those bills. THCB contributor Anonymous wrote about her tough experience accessing care last November. Now the bills are due and she finds herself on just that slippery slope. Here’s Anonymous story:
I was seen at the Alta Bates ER twice within a week for the same problem. Both times I received a form for the charity program. No one explained anything to me about two separate billing systems or that the charity program wouldn’t apply to the physician part of the bill. I initially needed help providing the proof required by the charity program. Alta Bates ignored my first letter in this regard, and I went through phone tree, transfer, and wait time hell to get to the right department to help me with the problem. When I eventually ended up with a financial counsellor, who was very helpful. She told me she could use  my prior year bank statements, and the charity care program then covered me 100%. I thought everything was wrapped up at that point.
A couple months later, I started receiving threat letters and calls from a collections agency. I called the financial counsellor and asked why I was being billed after I had been covered by the charity care program. She told me that there was a separate physician’s bill not covered by the charity care program. She also told me I had another outstanding bill from 2001(!) The 2001 bill is from a time when I was covered by insurance: I didn’t find out about that until it went into collections, either. But at that point I called my insurer, Blue Cross, and they took care of it. I haven’t heard about it since. Now Alta Bates expects me to remember my insurance information from 2001 to fix it when they were the ones who made the mistake of only applying my insurance information to one of my bills. I’m just boggled by that. Anyway, the counselor told me she couldn’t help me further at that point, and she gave me no guidance on how to proceed.
I went through phone tree, transfer, and wait time hell again, and I ended up at Berkeley Medical Group. I explained to them that I had qualified for the charity care program, no one had explained the two-bill concept or provided me with any alternate charity forms in the ER, and that I had been unaware that I had an outstanding bill until it had gone into collections. I was given the address of somebody in Washington State to write if I want to dispute the bad debt from 2001.The Berkeley Medical Group representative told me that they have no charity program and the fine print of the third bill warns it would go into collections. She did not seem to get what was wrong with the fact no one in the ER explains the fact there are two separate billing systems or explains steps indigent patients should take beyond giving them the forms for the charity care program. I asked her how I should proceed. She told me I had to deal with the collections agency now, and there was nothing she could do for me. I pointed out that the only thing adding a bad debt to the credit record of a person with no income would do would be to make it even harder for them to recover financially and be insured and/or able to pay such bills in the future. She told me that all I could do was call the collections agency.So, here’s where things stand now. I’m not going to call the collections agency. I went through this with the same agency in 2001 to deal with Alta Bates’ billing mistake, and I know this particular agency, American Capital, has a bad business reputation. I will only be setting myself up for threats and harassment if I call them. One amusing aspect is that the collections agency has been leaving messages on my answering machine: they don’t say who they are, but they give the collections case number and expect me to call them long distance! Anyway, I’m not going to deal with them.
I’m considering filing for bankruptcy. Whether I do that depends on whether I can take care of my student loans at the same time. My student loans might be exempt from a bankruptcy claim because they can always be deferred, but if I can get the loans taken care of that means that bankruptcy for hospital bills has larger ramifications for the U.S. financial system as a whole. I’m sure anyone who has to file bankruptcy for a hospital bill will take care of their other bills while they are at it. The question for me at this point is whether it does more damage to my credit rating to file for bankruptcy or simply ignore the collections agency notices. Which will fall off my credit record faster? I’m also amazed that Alta Bates has been continuing a practice that’s bound to confuse anyone who comes to their ER. Because of the 2001 billing problem, I know that problems like this have been going on at least that long. Surely I’m not the only person who has brought up that patients aren’t being given all the information in the ER. I’m wondering if there isn’t a Patient’s Bill of Rights violation in there somewhere. Even if there isn’t, Alta Bates and Berkeley Medical  Group end up paying extra administrative costs to hunt down people who were simply confused by their billing system.
This type of foul up is very common. A friend of mine who was well insured was sent to collections by a local medical center for a bill he’d already paid and was dismayed to find it reported as an unpaid debt recently on his credit report when he wanted to get a mortgage. And I personally just finished getting an unnamed insurance company to pay my final provider bill because they had miscalculated my deductible for surgery I had back last April. The move to more HSAs and forcing more people into dealing with a system that can produce bills from 5-10 seperate providers from one procedure is not exactly going to simplify matters. Horror stories like that of Anonymous’ are going to multiply.
And to add to
The news is that a new board within the FDA will
Two days before the latest hearings on Vioxx and Celebrex, with a stand-up Republican Senator all but accusing the FDA management of fraud, Bush names the new head of the FDA. And who gets the gig? None other than the guy who’s been temporarily running it onto the rocks.