This vendor says that the time is right for real aggressive CRM from health plans. He’s optimistic, but he might be right
PHARMA/POLICY: Anyone know about best price?
This is pretty interesting, and it relates to real wonkery AND to more stretching of the truth by my favorite health plan lobbyist, Karen Ignagni. In the article Drug firms to get profits windfall, a Univ of Minnesota Professor estimates that because the dual eligibles are no longer in Medicaid — they’re the ones that have been automatically moved to Medicare — and therefore they don’t have to offer "best price", they can charge higher prices to the taxpayer for their drugs.
The boost in profits comes from a shift in the drug coverage of 6.4 million poor and elderly people from Medicaid to the new Medicare drug benefit. Unlike Medicaid, which requires drug companies to charge their lowest or "best price" for medications, the Medicare program relies on competition among private drug plans to keep prices low.By eliminating the need to discount drugs for the government, the industry can now pocket the savings. "The net effect over 10 years is probably closer to $40 billion in extra profit," said Stephen Schondelmeyer, a pharmaceutical economics professor at the University of Minnesota. A little-known study by the Prudential Equity Group from June 2005 estimated that the makers of three anti-psychotic medications stand to benefit most from the change, taking in roughly $1.1 billion in new profits on products used by the 6.4 million who are Medicare’s most poor and frail patients.Experts say drug prices in the Medicare program will be higher this year than prices under Medicaid because the private Medicare drug plans won’t likely match the price discounts achieved by Medicaid, the joint state and federal health program for the poor.
Now hang on a second. This raises two key points. Not one week ago, Karen Ignagni said that the exact opposite was true. State medicaid directors were apparently telling her that they were getting worse deals than the private plans she represents. So which is true? Well guess who I’m more likely to believe. After all, did PhRMA pay all those political contributions to end up losing money
And then one thing that I just don’t know. Suspend your disbelief and pretend that at least in some cases for some drugs, Ignagni is telling the truth. Presumably best price still applies to the rest of the Medicaid program. Are deals between Pharma and Medicare Part D PDPs exempt from Medicaid best price? Anyone know?
POLICY: From the country that loves the HSA
The future of American health insurance, South African style — Patients bleed hospitals dry
Hospitals in Limpopo are owed about R146m by patients whose medical aid companies haven’t settled their bills and those who lied about being poor. Limpopo has 43 state hospitals that provide private wards for financially well-off patients who prefer to use their own doctors, instead of state doctors.Provincial health spokesperson Phuthi Seloba said on Tuesday that the department was seeking tenders from debt collection companies to collect the outstanding money, starting in March.
On the other hand, we know it’s a future that’s already here.
POLICY: I’m up elsewhere
Most stuff from me today is not here on THCB. Over at Spot-On I’m Amazed at Bush’s moderation? (no, not really),
Meanwhile, I’ve been blogging a storm, well a mild wind, over at TPMCafe about the guts of what’s going wrong in the guts of Medicare Part D, and a possible conspiracy theory about Medicare privatization.
Go long and take a look at the great stuff on both sites.
POLICY: Kevin Drum. Kevin Dumb?
I know he’s got a lot on his mind but leading liberal blogger Kevin Drum writing in his blog at The Washington Monthly actually wrote this in his post about HSAs:
These proposals sound pretty good, don’t they?
Did he start channeling Ron? Or was he just too lazy to go read the reams and reams of stuff written about HSAs, and figure out their one or two tiny flaws…
Who knows, but plenty of his commentators are ripping him a new one.
TECH: Live from the HISsies
MrHISTalk’s deputy Billy "Biff" JutJaw brings you the results of the HISsies. About as straight as West Palm Beach election, but a damn site funnier!
OFF-TOPIC/TECH: In the shower this morning I was thinking of going short, with UPDATE
And in my fantasy stock trading moments — Damn Damn Damn
But you might like my commment buried in a post over at Ezra’s when the stock was at $450, ooh as long ago as early last month!
Ezra’s one line post was Not that I don’t love my magazine and all, but I’m applying for a job with google. He was excited about the ncie work benefits and the stock options. My comment was “I’m thinking of going to work there, so long as the options they give me are puts.”
Once again—all talk no action at this end!
UPDATE: While I was mentally jerking off, this guy closed the deal using logic as well as intuition. But for some reason only went short 10 shares. Still he’s up $500 more than I am!
PBMs: Is PCMA learning AHIP’s tricks?
I’m so fond of analyzing "research" by AHIP that I’ve missed some from PCMA, the trade group of the PBMs. But if you go to their site you’ll learn that you, the consumer, are about to save $1.3 trillion over the next ten years because of our brave PBMs.
Well at least they haven’t taken to AHIPs trick of claiming savings for their consumers when their costs were going through the roof. I mean, who can dispute that the presence of PBMs is saving their consumers money? Well some people might but they can’t tell us what will happen in the future can they! After all, who knows what will happen in the future? No one! So what they say can’t be challenged!
You may guess that I’ll have a little more about this coming up. For now, hunt about in the section on PBMs in the CHCF report that came out yesterday, before I introduce you to some folks who’ve been overturning the rocks in the PBMs’ backyard.
QUALITY/POLICY: French fries for kids with their HSAs
For those of you too lazy to read Nick Kristof’s NYT column on why we’re so unhealthy, Pat Salber has summarized it for you.
PHARMA/POLICY: Richard Paey’s case hits 60 Minutes
Richard Paey was put in jail for 25 years basically taking pain pills, so that instead the state in Florida can fund his medical care. Oh the prosecutor said that he forged prescriptions, even though at first he wanted to go after his doctor. Well this shameful attack on a wheelchair-bound patient is finally getting some attention. Last Sunday is made it onto 60 Minutes.
Much of the thanks for this must go to John Tierney from the New York Times, who continually writes about the craziness of our war on patients and doctors. He pointed out in his column that the prosecutor is an earnest man who genuinely believes that he is doing the right thing, and claims that he made no medical judgments even though his entire case is based on his made-up "fact" that "no one could take 25 pills a day". He reminds me of the concentration camp guard, who was sure he was just following orders.
You’d think that, as Jeb Bush has a daughter who herself was in trouble for forging prescriptions, and apparently was just a regular addict, the wise Christian governor of Florida could find a little mercy in his heart.