Categories

Above the Fold

POLICY: Why Is Fixing American Health Care So Difficult?

Das KapitalABC News is running a special on health care this week and they asked two bloggers to stick in our 2c.  I’m up asking Why Is Fixing American Health Care So Difficult? David Williams from The Health Business Blog pens an article about IT and transparency that is slightly more optimistic.

Feel free to come back here and comment.

Almost all the problems with the American
health care system boil down to two questions. How do we create a
system that ensures that all citizens, and perhaps residents, have
access to health insurance? And how do we contain the huge cost
increases?

Of course, behind these questions lies the question of how to reform
the nation’s largest industry that serves and richly rewards many
powerful interests. Continue.

HEALTH PLANS: Wellpoint and United — not much to be proud of…(with 12 noon EST UPDATE)

It is getting pretty difficult to find something nice to say about the nation’s two largest health plans. Wellpoint’s Blue Cross of California unit, already fined by the fairly tame CA Dept. of Managed Healthcare, is now being sued by California hospitals for what appears to be a general systematic cancellation of high-cost member policies. It’s worth noting that they don’t seem to be investigating the applications of those members who didn’t make any claims. Lisa Girion, on her way to health care journalistic stardom at the LA Times has more:

A class-action lawsuit filed Friday on behalf of all California hospitals accused Blue Cross of California of routinely violating state law by refusing to pay hundreds of hospitals statewide for patient care it authorized.The suit is the latest salvo in a growing controversy over actions by Blue Cross to cancel the individual health insurance of sick policyholders, sometimes saddling canceled patients with huge medical bills. Although Blue Cross contends that the cancellations are justified partly to crack down on fraud, consumer advocates and policyholders say some revocations are carried out simply as a way for Blue Cross to avoid paying expensive claims.

Larry Glasscock, the CEO of Anthem, (now Wellpoint) has been pretty quiet in the press, but Wellpoint’s pre-merger figurehead Len Schaeffer has historically not been–and it’s his side of the company that evidently was causing all the trouble. In fact as I’ve pointed out here before, although Schaeffer accurately understands what the problems in health care are (practice variation and a lack of IT use) the solutions he used over the years don’t solve those problems, but instead relied on better risk selection and more aggressive pricing to make Wellpoint very profitable. What exactly was his "value-add" to society for all that money he "earned".

for whom the bill tolls

But of course in the lexicon of earners he’s a chump compared to Bill McGuire at UnitedHealth Group. It does appear though that McGuire may be fired by Monday as an external investigation suggests that the stock options he received were all illegally backdated. Whether or not it was illegal, his actions suggest staggering greed. He already had wealth beyond anyone’s imagination. What exactly was the point in cooking the books and effectively stealing from shareholders to add more?

I guess with the amount of sycophants he surrounded himself with, like these ones quote in the WSJ he really felt he was worth every penny of the $1.6 billion, or whatever:

"We’re so lucky to have Bill," Ms. Mundinger, a longtime
compensation-committee member, told the Journal earlier this year. Of his rising
pay, she said: "He needs to be compensated appropriately so that his business
model has believability in the market."

It wouldn’t be quite so bad if the bulk of these profits and vast riches were made back in the 1990s. At least then health plans were acting as what Uwe Reinhardt used to call "bounty hunters" and saw their mission as removing the excess earnings of hospitals and specialists, even if they were redirecting some of them to their executives. But at least Malik Hassan (Healthnet) and Len Abramson (US Healthcare) were clearly going after the providers and were delivering lower rates of premium growth (and in some years negative growth) to their customers, the big employers.

But in the past six to seven years, that has all changed. The health insurers have completely given up trying to figure out how to lower costs, and have just stuck big increases onto their customers. What’s worse is that as overall premiums and costs have gone up, the share that the insurers have kept has increased! Thus, they are screwing their customers, and at the same time keeping a bigger share of larger revenues–which has resulted in those huge profits and stock option gains.

And even worse, they’ve all got heavily into the business of destroying what was left of the risk pool by providing high-deductible highly underwritten plans such as Tonik (Wellpoint), or even worse buying scumbag quasi-fraudulent plans such as Rooney’s Golden Rule (United).

I know that the employers and taxpayers are dumb, but that doesn’t mean it’s been a good thing for McGuire, Schaeffer et al to take advantage of them.

There are obviously talented and good people working in many parts of health plans, as I’ve documented elsewhere. Several major innovations have come from within them, particularly in population and disease management. But recently the people in the executive suites have shamed their organizations and harmed not only their industry, but the health care system and society as a whole.

And, eventually, that will mean that when time comes to make an argument in favor of why we should have a private sector health care insurance industry, the rational moderate voices in support of some role for health insurance intermediaries–of whom barely count myself as one– will be that much weaker.

UPDATE: McGuire is indeed gone. What happens to his $1.6bn of in the money vested options is less clear. Wall Street doesn’t seem to care–the stock is flat today.

POLITICS/PHARMA: Bush Aides Called Evangelicals ‘Nuts’

TfApparently Karl Rove and friends think that the religious right is nuts

A new book by a former White House official says that President Bush’s top political advisors privately ridiculed evangelical supporters as "nuts" and "goofy" while embracing them in public and using their votes to help win elections. The former official also writes that the White House office of faith-based initiatives, which Bush promoted as a nonpolitical effort to support religious social-service organizations, was told to host pre-election events designed to mobilize religious voters who would most likely favor Republican candidates. The assertions by David Kuo, a top official in the faith-based initiatives program, have rattled Republican strategists already struggling to persuade evangelical voters to turn out this fall for the GOP.

I can’t say that I disagree with them. But if the sophisticated Bushie’s are merely using the religious right to win elections and otherwise ignore them when they govern—as many on the religious right have said—why did they have to give them control over the FDA and other allegedly “neutral” agencies that regulate science in the process?

TECH: Stents and the lack of technology assessment in action

CabgNewer Stents Pose Dangers, 2 Doctors Say. That would be the drug eluting stents, now racking up a $6bn odd in US revenue for their manufacturers.

Well what did you expect? Oh, and by the way, still no evidence that stents are better than CABGs for the payer or the patient, in fact it’s still probably the other way around —as THCB has been saying for a while. But don’t expect much to change. After all you need more than evidence to stop this ball rolling downhill.

For example, I met someone with a new and better drug-eluting stent (from ex-BSX but now with Abbott) only last week, so if we decide that Cypher and Taxus aren’t the best answer, I’m sure the real answer will be something new—not something old.

 

INTERNATIONAL: Health care costs, and not just here!

I spent rather more than I’d like of my Thursday night writing a piece I promised ABCNews for their week-long series on the health care system that starts Sunday. As I was finishing up I saw this. It’s not exactly what I was writing about, but it’s not far away—Medical costs push 78 million Asians into poverty

International health experts have estimated that 78 million more Asians than previously thought are living in poverty because of healthcare costs. Many people in Asian countries do not have health insurance and pay for doctor bills and medical treatments. But the out-of-pocket health expenses they incur are not included in conventional estimates of poverty.When researchers deducted the medical costs from total household resources in 11 Asian countries, millions more people fell below the internationally accepted poverty threshold of $1 per head per day. "If you allow for direct out-of-pocket healthcare payments, there are another 78 million counted as poor," said Dr Eddy van Doorslaer, a health economist at Erasmus University in the Netherlands who headed the research team."We calculated that an additional 2.7 percent of the population under study ended up with less than $1 a per day after they had paid for healthcare." The figures, which are reported in the Lancet medical journal on Friday, are based on information from national expenditure surveys of what people spend on medical care in the various countries. The researchers extrapolated the national, representative samples to cover the entire population. Overall the study showed the prevalence of poverty was 14 percent higher than other estimates that did not include out-of-pocket healthcare costs.

POLICY: Healthcare by Lobbyist By Eric Novack

Das Kapital
Place this in the ‘toot my own horn’ category. And in the ‘you really ought to listen to The Eric Novack Show’ at www.ericnovack.com‘ category.

From the Wall Street Journal October 10, 2006 edition:

Competition is an issue that many patient-advocacy groups wrestle with as they struggle to raise funds for research, attract greater interest in their diseases, and speed up the search for a cure.

The article ostensibly discusses how there are over 140 advocacy groups for brain tumors alone— and how they actively compete against each other for members, funding, and the ear (and hopefully pocketbooks) of elected officials.

As we give more and more power over the administration, funding and regulation over to unelected bureaucrats appointed by our ever campaigning politicians, we head toward the only guaranteed outcome of ‘single payer’, ‘single pool’, ‘national’ healthcare:  the protected by law, expanded by lawsuit, and guarded by lobbyists development of healthcare-by-lobbying.

In the world of healthcare-by-lobbying, heart disease advocates fight against Alzheimer’s groups, child advocates fight against the AARP, hip replacement makers fight against pacemaker manufacturers.

There is no free market-no free market of ideas, no free market for patients, no free market for doctors. And busy legislators find themselves uncertain about what the greatest need is for patients because each group emphasizes different issues or aspects of the disease.

There is also recognition that as cancer research increasingly focuses on using costly, cutting-edge technology to identify genes and cellular changes as an avenue to new treatments, progress is going to take huge sums of money that small patient-advocacy groups are unlikely to be able to raise on their own.

I have yet to ever hear an argument from the single payer advocates how this can be prevented.  Rather, it appears as if this is an essential part of their plan.

Proof- spend 10 minutes reading the single payer bill vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger in California last month.  80+ pages of committees and  bureaucracy.

POLICY: Aetheist pokes fun at religious institution not offering much charity

Yup I’m at up at Spot-on talking about the nun who lost her health insurance. It’s called Get cancer? Get fired, become homeless and lose your health insurance!. As ever you can come back here to comment.

Here’s to the new road to ruin in America. Got cancer? Now you can get
fired, become homeless and lose your health insurance, and therefore
all your money too! Statistically, it’s unlikely to happen. But it’s
perfectly legal if your employer has very few scruples.

Being a member of one of America’s most despised minorities – atheists (or secular humanists as we’re now calling ourselves) – and being none too impressed with the New York Times in recent years with both its reporting of Iraq and its continued insistence on writing rubbish about how we get the health care system we want, I have been doubly gratified by a current Times series
on the unfair privileges which religious institutions receive in the
U.S. It illustrates, in passing, an important point about the
relationship between health insurance and employment – for the worse,
I’m afraid. Continue

assetto corsa mods