The Health Care Blog – Page 1050 – Everything you always wanted to know about the Health Care system. But were afraid to ask.

Above the Fold

Aspen Report 3 – Removing the Blinders: Dr. Kelman’s Wonderful Contribution, Brian Klepper

Oct 18, 2007• 2

One
of the most fascinating and moving experiences at the Aspen Health
Forum – Given the quality of the content there, this is saying
something. The audience was rapt – was a talk by Neen Hunt, Executive
Director of the Lasker Foundation.
Each year this organization bestows a hugely prestigious prize to
individuals who have made significant contributions to scientific
medicine, clinical medicine and public service.

Dr. Hunt’s talk
focused on combating the geeky stereotypes that often are associated
with people with dedicated passions, and on conveying their broad
humanity. Her vehicle was a character portrait of Dr. Charles D.
Kelman, an ophthalmologist practicing in Manhattan during the latter
half of the 1900s, who in an incredibly bold stroke, blew past
convention, inciting the wrath of those tied to the established order,
and revolutionized the way that cataract surgeries are performed.

PODCAST: Overtreated–Shannon Brownlee explains all

Oct 18, 2007• 4

Overtreated is a marvelous new book by Shannon Brownlee. Shannon is a former US News & World Report health reporter, and now is a Fellow at the New America Foundation (that’s the centrist third way Clintonite Dem one). In the book she’s essentially trying to channel Jack Wennberg for the masses, and you all know how important that is.

I spoke to her about the book, changing the perception about what Americans think about the power of medicine, and how journalists haven’t got much chance of changing what they write about health. It was a great conversation.

TECH/HEALTH2.0: Marissa Mayer speaks Google Health

Oct 18, 2007• 11

At Web2.0 Summit yesterday (no, Matthew isn’t important enough to be invited to apply for a ticket, but I met a VC for lunch there so I knew it was happening!) Google’s new (and presumably temporary) head of health care Marissa Mayer gave some more details about what’s coming.

First, it’s supposed to be arriving in early 2008.

Second it’s going to have in it the already leaked PHR components, and it will include a rumored (but I don’t think confirmed to this point), physician directory. More interestingly apparently While some parts of the system will be free, she says, the health care services and applications could be subscription-based.

Google hasn’t really done subscription based services to this point, and consumers haven’t exactly flocked to them in heath care as yet. So what they’re thinking about there I’m curious to know.

I’m also wondering what’s happening in the 90 minute all hands meetings Marissa has every day with the Google health team!

But of course so long as Google owns search and search owns the Internet, what they decide to do in health care is about as important as anything—hence our continued fascination.

CODA: By the way, Richard Martin, the scribe at Information Week is probably causing the Redmond PR folks to be pulling their hair out. He says, Microsoft has not publicly disclosed its plans for a health-related product, but is said to be working on an offering that combines software with an online component. Given the attention lavished on a lowly blogger to make sure I knew all about the health piece of Live Search and Healthvault launch earlier this month, I’m sure someone at Information Week should have caught wind of Microsoft’s activity!

HOSPITALS: Why We Don‘t Have Enough Nurses (It’s Not Low Wages) By Maggie Mahar

Oct 17, 2007• 29

THCB contributor Maggie Mahar returns today with another of her insightful pieces on the business of healthcare. If you haven’t yet done so, you are hereby commanded – yes, as in that’s an order – you should go pick up your copy of Money Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Healthcare costs so much, Maggie’s recent study of the forces at work in the healthcare marketplace.

Consider
this: In the San Francisco area, a nurse with a bachelor’s degree can
hope to start out with a salary of $104,000. The salary for a nursing
professor with a Ph.D. at University of California San Francisco starts
at about $60,000.

This goes a long way toward explaining why nursing schools turned
away 42,000 qualified applications in 2006-2007—even as U.S. hospitals
scramble to find nurses. We don’t have enough teachers in nursing
schools and the fact that the average nursing professor is nearly 59
while the average assistant professor is about 52 suggests that, as
they retire, the shortage could turn into a crisis. The most recent issue of JAMA (October
10, 1007) reports that in 2005 we had 218,800 fewer nurses than we
needed and by 2012, it’s estimated that we’ll be short some 1 million
nurses.

Hospitals have had to raise nursing salaries (as well they should),
not just because nurses are scarce but because, in our chaotic hospital
system, the work can be extraordinarily stressful.

Nurses know better than anyone just how many “adverse events” occur each day –even in the most prestigious U.S. hospitals.

“I’m terrified of killing someone,” one young nurse confided to me
about a year ago. After working in a hospital in Bermuda for a number
of years, she was bored, and had come back to work in New York, where
she had friends and family. She had worked in New York before, but she
wasn’t at all sure that she would stay. “In our hospitals, it’s just
too crazy,” she said.

Her story also sheds light on why nursing professors are willing to
work for $60,000 a year when they could, no doubt, more than double
their salaries if they were willing to wade into the fray at local
hospitals.

Continue reading post at HealthBeat

HEALTH 2.0: Sermo CEO Daniel Palestrant

Oct 17, 2007

Monday’s announcement that Sermo, the social
networking site for doctors, is teaming up with Pfizer has left the company one
of the most-talked about tech startups in the country. In this clip from
September’s Health 2.0 conference, Sermo CEO Daniel Palestrant introduces his
company’s business model and walks viewers on a guided tour through the Sermo
web site , talking about the reasons "the wisdom of crowds" promises
to be a potent force in medicine.

We Are What We Eat: Where Is America’s Leadership? – Brian Klepper

Oct 17, 2007• 13

One of the attributes of a great image is its ability to convey vast amounts of information and meaning quickly and simply. Here’s a terrific example.

In one of his typically astute comments, Barry Carol alerted us to a wonderfully clever graphic by Wellington Gray – the image needs more space to be viewed properly than this blog allows, so you’ll have to click on the link – displaying the percentage of people older than 15 in different developed countries with a Body Mass Index greater than 30. In other words, the percentage of fat adults.

What Obesity Really Costs – Brian Klepper

Oct 16, 2007• 20

Any
lingering doubts that America’s cavalier attitude toward lousy food and
obesity is draining the nation’s health and economic vitality should
have been laid to rest a couple weeks ago. Two important studies were released
that quantified just how much our inability to resist fast food is
costing us.

In Health Affairs, the premier journal of
health care market dynamics, economics and policy, Professor Ken Thorpe
and colleagues from Emory reported on a study comparing incidences of chronic disease in the US and in 10 European countries.
They found strong evidence that Americans have much higher levels of
lifestyle-related chronic disease than do Europeans – in other words,
we’re sicker – that American medicine tends to identify and treat
disease more aggressively than does European medicine, and that our
more excessive lifestyles and aggressive treatment patterns undoubtedly
contribute significantly to our much higher per capita health care
spending, which can be twice what Europeans pay.

TECH: CCR Training Workshop

Oct 16, 2007• 2

The goal of the ASTM CCR Training Workshop is to give developers and
programmers in Health2.0, as well as traditional health IT, a "deep
dive" into the CCR standard, its schema, and current uses of the CCR
for portability and interoperability of health information exchange.
For those who don’t know about the CCR standard, it is an easily
implemented and widely adopted XML schema for capturing a "snapshot" of
a person’s most relevant health information, such as demographics,
diagnoses and problems, medications, allergies, immunizations, family
history, and care plans. It is an open and royalty-free standard
sponsored by numerous physician and medical organizations, including
the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Family
Physicians. Information on the next ASTM CCR Training Workshop can be
found on the home page of www.ccrstandard.com. David C. Kibbe, MD MBA and Steven Waldren, MD are faculty for the one-day workshop.

Aspen Report 2 – Healing Unbound: The Promise of Advancing Computational Power, Brian Klepper

Oct 15, 2007• 2

Laptop-attached ultrasound units that produce startlingly clear internal images for five dollars in the field. Organs that re-generate inside scaffolds. Drugs tailored to an individual’s biology. Micro-images of cancerous cells lit up by bio-chemical markers. Decision support tools that scan the physiological values in electronic health records for patterns too complex to be detected by an unaided clinician.

The advances available from dramatic improvements in computational capabilities were a recurring theme at the Aspen Health Forum, with experts from each discipline describing where the technology was leading us. I attended two sessions featuring Star Trek clips that predicted realities now within at least theoretical reach. (Prescient and corny, audiences nodded nostalgically.) Sessions on biotechnology, imaging, electronic health records (EHRs) and the hospital of the future highlighted the power that is being leveraged to improve care.

HEALTH2.0: Sermo, Pfizer: Big Pharma puts big toe in social networking waters

Oct 15, 2007• 9

You can’t trust those Brits. I get a super exclusive on the Sermo-Pfizer deal and those damn Brits at the FT break the press embargo. So much for “honour” amongst journalists!

This is the latest version of Big Pharma’s experiment to figure out how to replace the incredibly inefficient way it researches, sells to and communicates with doctors. The very baby steps of starting to cut those detail forces are just starting to be taken, but while those empires slowly get dismantled over the coming decade(s), something needs to be put into its place. eDetailing via video has been a bust so far, and putting those hot cheerleaders into the doctor’s office is getting more and more expensive.

So the deal is that Pfizer (and of course soon other pharmas) will be able to put information into the social networking site. This has great opportunity and great peril for big Pharma. Of course there’s lots of information that they can contribute, and lots of contacts that they can make. But on the other hand, they are definitely losing control over the message.