Tech

Epic Systems’ Open Platform Will Bring U.S. Health Care Delivery Into the 21st Century

thcbEpic Systems, the market leader in electronic health record software (EHR), recently made a quiet but potentially transformative announcement that may finally shake the healthcare industry out of its technological doldrums.

Epic said it is prepared to support the creation of a more open interoperability platform for integration with other diversified healthcare applications. This will attract substantial investment to create software that operates, hopefully seamlessly, within the Epic EHR infrastructure.  Expect Epic’s competitors to follow suit, eventually opening up the marketplace of installed EHRs to third-party software developers and the efficiencies of modern, post-EHR technology ecosystem.

Epic’s critics have often denounced the company for selling a mostly closed technology, dampening hopes for the creation of an ecosystem of best-of-breed applications that work together with the EHR to automate much of the care delivery infrastructure beyond patient intake and billing.  The value of such an infrastructure is extremely compelling and so the company is under enormous pressure from its customers to become more open.

An open-architecture environment, with published Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and open standards, will improve the functionality of EHRs in myriad ways.  Consider innovations such as full-service, secure, HIPAA compliant mobile care networks within and around hospitals, integrated delivery systems and ambulatory care providers. These networks would facilitate powerful point-of-care mobile automation, such as the delivery of interactive care checklists to doctors, nurses and patients; the sharing of patient medical histories to create a comprehensive care record; and automating the patient hospital discharge process with care plans developed digitally by physicians and nurses for their individual patients.  These networks integrated to the data available through the EHR will also enable advanced workflow applications.  Imagine providers interacting with one another and their patients in real-time, independent of care settings when care considerations and treatments get logged as part of a living patient record and, ultimately, when real-time software and cognitive analytics can aid in the development of patient care options.

The move toward open-standards, cloud-based, mobile-enabled EHR applications will be the biggest development in the healthcare software industry in many years.  The passage in 2009 of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) stimulated the adoption of EHRs, but these systems were largely built on older technology and struggle to incorporate the benefits of internet-based architectures, enabling cloud and mobile computing, and as such, today the EHR value proposition still remains uncertain.  However, open standards for interoperability is the key to opening up the EHR infrastructure to all facets of the provider value chain.

One of Psilos’ investments, PatientSafe Solutions, developer of a smart point-of-care mobile communications network, is already working on adapting their product for to Epic’s open source standards.  As the CEO of PatientSafe Solutions, Joe Condurso, recently mentioned, “All of our customers are now seeking to optimize their EHR investments through interoperability in order to liberate and activate data with mobile tools for clinicians and patients. It’s an important part of our operations today. Being able to leverage OpenEpic to interoperate and connect with the Epic allows us to deliver more capabilities for our customers to prepare for quality and value-based reimbursement.”

Open architecture EHR as the standard, rather than the exception, should set the stage for a much brighter future for participants at all levels in the healthcare arena. Let’s hope it meets its promise and makes the delivery of U.S. healthcare — not just our medical technology — the envy of the world.

Steve Krupa is the Senior Managing Member of Psilos, a healthcare venture capital firm. 

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Tech, THCB

Tagged as: , , , , ,

11
Leave a Reply

8 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
mnStephen M KrupaJoe FlowerAndy Oramjohn irvine Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
mn
Guest
mn

As an end-user please someone create something better than Epic. It reminds me of where is waldo, who has time for all that junk.

Stephen M Krupa
Guest

Believe me I understand the skepticism. For the most part I see companies acting largely for competitive reasons and I believe we have reached the point where it is in the competitive interest of EHR vendors to become more open-sourced. Certainly they are all under pressure to provide value to their customers for the significant investments made in their products, but more importantly, a strategy of locking-out compelling applications will be difficult to sustain as our overall computing infrastructure becomes more and more powerful. The land grab from HITECH is largely complete. It will be to the competitive advantage of… Read more »

Joe Flower
Guest

Okay, I’m all for this. If it happens. But I still have my left eyebrow cocked skeptically, for several reasons. Mostly, it seems to be all about allowing other bits of software to dock onto the Epic ecosystem. There seems to be nothing new here about better Epic interchange with other systems, which would be a real face-about (despite Epic’s claims to the contrary).

Andy Oram
Guest

Bobby, I think that you can see, even in asking your question, that HIPAA is outdated on this particular issue (being designed for paper or maybe CDs) and that doctors can no longer feel that they own your glucose count or your other information. I think the whole thrust of HITECH and the ACA is that clinicians no longer fear giving information to their “competitors,” who are in theory all united in trying to fix our health problems. I’m glad you highlighted the current, obstructionist thinking in the health care and EHR industries.

@BobbyGvegas
Guest

Yeah, Andy. I had to sit on my HIE’s HIPAA P&S task force (akin to a root canal w/out anaesthesia, replete with $500/hr insufferable know-it-all Counsel), and was our lead for our P&S Policies and Procedures writing for HIPAA compliance. While HIPAA may indeed by “outdated,” the recent Omnibus revisions do in fact govern, and were updated to address ePHI (though they do not address modes of transmission specifically). Another material HIPAA legislative update may be 6-10 years out. Lotta people also don’t realize that “PHI privacy and security” was an 11th-hour toss-in afterthought in the 1996 law (aka “Kennedy-Kassebaum”).… Read more »

Andy Oram
Guest

Although FHIR is looking like a strong standard, I see two further barriers to interoperability, one technical and one financial. The technical barrier is the definition of profiles that are appropriate to different clinical contexts and followed by all vendors. If profiles are as fuzzy or poorly defined as, say, the CCD-A, FHIR will be of little help to us. The financial barrier is the EHR vendors’ and clinicians’ infuriating charges for exchanging data, which is like Amazon.com charging you to read a book review on its site. That has to change, and the enormous variability of uses to which… Read more »

@BobbyGvegas
Guest

On the money side, there’s a significant “first mover disadvantage” thing. As I’ve noted elsewhere on THCB: Healthcare data, being way more complex and voluminous than other types of consumer data, are much more expensive to originate and manage. That we should concomitantly expect the originators of those data to simply freely provide them to competitors seems more than just a bit naive. Even under HIPAA, notwithstanding that you nominally “own” your PHI (the right of access, more precisely), the curating providers can charge you “reasonable costs” for obtaining them (see 45 CFR 164.524). So, what is “reasonable”? And, are… Read more »

civisisus
Guest
civisisus

Yeah, the author of the phrase “trust, but verify” may as well have uttered it with Epic in mind

Bubba For President
Guest
Bubba For President

This is a stretch.