Uncategorized

HEALTH PLANS/POLICY: Would you buy a used health care policy solution from this association?

Here it is. AHIP’s Proposal — because they didn’t obviously didn’t get enough at the MMA trough in the last go around, they figure another $30 Billion a year for ten years will get us all the way to 95% coverage in 10 years.

Um, how about getting to 100% coverage for no more money than we’re spending now? I could do that. Of course that might piss some people off along the way, including those AHIP members with their snouts deepest in the trough. But fear not, that’ll come too because no way that this coalition can seriously hold together given the discrepancy of interests and moral values amongst their membership—even with its leader’s skill in believing her own prevariactions. Because eventually the shysters and those who genuinely believe that they add value to the care process will not be able to hang together.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: ,

5
Leave a Reply

5 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
PeterjdGadflyAlexLynn Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Peter
Guest
Peter

Just another attempt by self serving corporate america that sees the writing on the wall but wants to preserve the status quo – income. “This bold program would expand coverage to tens of millions within a framework that is fiscally sound and promotes individual responsibility.” I thought the present system did that? Looks like their looking for government hand-outs. “The plan is designed to expand access to health insurance coverage to all children within three years and 95 percent of adults within 10 years. AHIP estimates that full implementation of this proposal would cost the federal government approximately $300 billion… Read more »

jd
Guest
jd

Matt, you hit the nail on the head. The key question is whether a coalition can be generated to actually move forward on reform (as opposed to just an expansion of government funding). Reform means re-engineering the system and the incentives in the system. The current proposals make some noises in that direction, but everything concrete refers to having the government subsidize more health insurance. That won’t save any money. Unlike you, I do think it is possible that heads can be knocked, backs can be rubbed, and debates can be won to move AHIP into a more progressive stance.… Read more »

Gadfly
Guest

This sounded like AHIP’s attempt to get the government to do their HSA marketing for them.

Alex
Guest
Alex

Keep reading Lynn

Lynn
Guest
Lynn

Well I suspose the tooth fairy is a form of dental insurance too.
Just how exactly do folks qualifying for the earned income tax credit benefit from a $500 tax credit for providing insurance for their children? Even in MA they recognize the threshold of 300% FPL.