Categories

Above the Fold

BLOGS: Grand Rounds

Welcome to Grand Rounds on THCB, the weekly round-up of all
that is good and great in medical and health care blogging. This is a
special edition as it’s the last of 2005 and so I’ve asked my fellow
bloggers for their best posts of 2005. For some of them, like any great
soccer player whose best goal is their last, their best post is their
most recent. But for many we’ve gone back into the archives. There’s
some great stuff, and some great series of posts too. So let me act
like the consultant I am and put it into sections, and act like the
blogger that I also am, and give you some not so unbiased commentary.
Oh, and it’s pretty long with some nearly 60 posts mentioned. But you
weren’t doing anything else this week, were you?  So settle in and
enjoy.

This was the year that the medical and health care blogosphere
exploded. I now track some 25 “healthcare” blogs and over 40 “medical”
blogs in my Bloglines,
and there are many, many more. But of course I’m going to start with
the ones I like the most. You’ll note that some of mine feature
somewhere in here too, but then again what’s the season of goodwill if
at least a little isn’t self-directed!

Personal favorites: Medbloggers

My two favorite medbloggers are Bob Centor at DB’s MedRants and Syd Smith at Medpundit. Bob had a great series on the key to being a good doctor, not understanding the disease but “Understanding the patient”. He put it at the top of his Top 10 for the year, but they’re all worth a read. Sydney at Medpundit
is someone I’ve had running battles with over the years, but she is
still the doyen of MedBloggers (although she says she’s slowing down).
And when she’s not driving me mad ranting about Canada or Holland,
she’s either brutally honest about the process of putting an EMR into a solo physician’s office, as described in her three part series, or she’s a breath of common sense in a world filled with hype—such as her take on Herceptin being the cure for cancer. Hardly.

Personal Favorites: Health IT Guys

But I’m a business and tech guy so I like a couple of bloggers who
live in that world. And they each bring attention to screamingly
important issues that tech people are not paying enough attention to in
these days of national infrastructure revolutions. Shahid Shah, The HealthCare IT Guy gives you the skinny on — when we are building these health care information systems — why data models matter.
Complex, but trouble if it’s not understood (and it’s not). The other
huge issue is whether the EMR/CPOE is usable by physicians. Mr HISTalk, the leading cult health care blogger you may never have heard of, tells you what’s behind a famous recent CPOE study where it looks like things went very wrong. There was lots and lots of discussion on a post written by Kelly Clark on THCB about whether physicians can learn to love the EMR. Of course if you want the real (and cynical) low down on RHIOs, Mr HISTalk has that too in his RHIO guide for CIOs (scroll
down in the post). If you want more on health care IT, Shahid has set
up an aggregator of virtually every health care IT blog at the HITSphere.

Policy wonks: Too many favorites to count

Health care is in essence about politics, but the mainstream
political bloggers not only hardly mention it but betray staggering
ignorance when they do. Meanwhile, the academics in Ivory Towers tend
not to sully themselves explaining the problems in the health care
insurance system to the masses (although Paul Krugman has been making a
half-decent effort). Filling this hole is a group of valiant bloggers,
divided between the old farts wise heads, and the young punks. Much of my writing on THCB mostly lives here, although I moonlight policy stuff at Spot-on.

Elisa at HealthyConcerns (despite being sponsored by an
insurance broker) is a (in health care terms) young punk learning about
health care and getting upset about medical underwriting that stops ordinary people getting health insurance. And she’s not alone, and by no means should she be. In fact we should all be much more outraged about uninsurance. Of course over at political blog Spot-on I explain why health care will be the domestic political issue of the next couple of decades.
Back in the torpor of 2005, consumer health, CDHPs, HSAs et al are the
new propaganda slogans of the health care “free-marketeers”. Tom
Hilliard at Signal Health is not impressed by the Cato Institute’s approach
promoting it and ended up with interesting comments from his targets at
Cato and their quasi-fellow traveler Wharton professor Mark Pauly, who
stepped down briefly from his ivory tower to speak to the masses. Still
in the new consumer health mode, Joe Paduda at Managed Care Matters was suspicious of AOL founder Steve Case’s Revolution Health when it was announced, and didn’t really see that it had much going for it after Case chucked the first $250m into the ring.

Pay for Performance is going to be one of the screaming big deals
for the future of healthcare no matter what system we end up with. At Health Voices Hippocrates (Dmitriy Kruglyak) has a three part series
on the concept and complexities of P4P, suggesting that the American
College of Physicians has a reasonable approach. Henry Sturn at InsureBlog thinks that P4P might work, or at least that tipping doctors is no more dumb than tipping waiters.

Talking of series, Ezra Klein had perhaps the best of the year from a health policy perspective, explaining in concise terms what goes on in the health systems of Japan, Germany, Canada, France and the UK.
Really good stuff from a young punk who is helping drag health care
into the mainstream policy debate. Fellow punkette Kate Steadmanhas been displaying great promise (and hopefully having a good recuperation from her own recent surgery), and her piece on the society lady in the Midwest who couldn’t understand  why her uninsured housekeeper couldn’t get access to a doctor is a classic. Don’t miss the comments which show some of the pure frustration and pain of the uninsured.

Medicare Modernization Act and its Part D (drug coverage)’s
introduction passes for what counts as health “policy” in these days of
ignoring the problem. Another great series at Healthy Policy from Kate Steadman, was this whole series on what’s so screwed up about Part D. (Hint—virtually all of it). Joe Paduda explains why private plans like Medicare Part D so much–they’re playing at the casino with the bank’s taxpayers money (note the comment from the true believer!). The best explanation of how to use CMS’ very user-unfriendly calculator to
figure out your Part D process comes from medical student Graham
Walker—so much for the great works of government, even though since
2001 it’s now run by CEOs instead of those incompetent bureaucrats. Of
course if you really want to understand the problems behind Medicare
and the angst it causes political liberals, you could do worse that
read what I wrote on THCB about separating the Medicare discussion between its individual and corporate welfare sides.

And if you really want the long term picture of the tension between
social and individualistic health care in the political world, well,
this old chestnut from January 2005 in THCB might amuse you. It’s called Health Care = Communism + Frappuccinos.

Physician and clinician blogs about medicine

When most people think of medical blogs, it’s usually about the
experiences of clinical professionals dealing with patients and others
who get in their way. In this blogging round-up, that world lives here,
and it’s proof that medicine is a lot more complex than we lay people
and consultants tend to make it out to be.

That complexity shows up as often as not in the emergency department. DrTony hangs out in ED’s and is troubled by suicides at what’s supposed to be the happiest time of year. Gruntdoc lives there too and is devastated by a sudden head injury and life long brain damage to a teenager. On the other hand he was aggrieved that the WSJ got it wrong on how emergency doctors should treat strokes. Doc Shazam is writing fiction about how one might end up in the ED. Kim, an emergency RN  has some amusements over what happens in patient–clinician “communication” at Emergiblog.

Meanwhile outside the ED Graham Walker at Over My Med Body knows that both patients and doctors can be the difficult ones.  Medscape’s The Differential has some blogging students and residents, whom we all know are overworked. Pin-Chieh Chiang has a cartoon which describes how they get by on no sleep! And while Kristen Heinan finds pediatrics therapeutic, Iranian med blogger Ali Tabatabaey instead uses medicine to observe a Culture of War

And if you want to see some of the gory pictures that make me glad
I’m not a doctor like my old man, head to Jon Mikel Iñarritu’s post on open fractures classification and its clinical manifestations at Unbounded Medicine. Lots of fracture images with the emphasis on the word “open”. Meanwhile, troops in Iraq are picking up a yucky sounding skin infection called leishmaniasis from sand-fly bites, although Mike Pechar at Informed Participant tells us that 12 million people each year in the developing world get it. On a better known note, Paul Cheney at The Cancer Blog tells of the announcement from (the now late) Peter Jennings that he had cancer and that chemo was a bear. Barbados Butterfly gives us a harrowing tale of a patient bleeding out.

Even deeper in the science of medicine psychoanalyst blogger ShrinkWrapped is lost in the brain looking for the development of the self. To round out the topic of physician blogs, there’s an entire self selected Top 10 of the year at the Internal Medicine Doctor, the Mad House Madman, who writes the Chronicles of a Medical Madhouse.

Finally, the RedStateMoron explains why he’s in high risk obstetrics. It’s a personal and moving story.

Drugs, developed and marketed.

The pharma business is a very important part of health care. We’ll start with my favorite in the space, Derek Lowe at In The Pipeline.
Derek usually lives in the R part of the R &D world, but he has
lots to say about the industry’s tribulations from the inside. For
instance, he thinks that the NEJM may be covering its legal ass with its repudiation of the Vioxx VIGOR study, while he considers a reader’s suggestion that Pfizer’s new clinical trial for Celebrex is a four year insurance program against more suits.

And more in your brain on drugs: Dr Crippen at NHS Blog Doctor in the UK thinks that we are over-medicating children,
and that it’s mostly the fault of drug companies who, now done with the
medicalization of overactive kids, are interested in doing the same to
his wife’s….inadequate intimate bodily functions, as diagnosed by her
hairdresser. (We blush at THCB about those topics, unless they concern horny school-teachers).

Now we’re getting a little silly, but pharma just seemed to inspite
it this year. Grand Rounds originator and ring-master (all hail!)
Nicholas Genes at Blogborygmi was having too much fun with those ridiculous clinical trial names, and  Ira Segal at Doc Around the Clock  was enjoying himself just a little with the concept that no-one seems to be paying for product placement in the ED. And the list of the year was the one with the real meaning of those pharma-medica(il)logical terms as explained by the cheerleaders at PharmaGossip. John Mack at the Pharma Marketing Blog can’t keep his thoughts away from those cheerleaders or ex-Mrs Rolling Stones selling impotence drugs
either. And there was plenty on the most bizarre pharma PR blunder of
the year — the financing of the “terrorists take over the Canadian drug
import market” novel, most notably described by Roy Poses at Health Care Renewal.

Problems in the provider world

Of course there are hospitals and there are clinicians and there are problems and half in that world too.

Stuart Henochowicz at MedViews is concerned that we spend too much on buildings and not enough on nursing basics, something that meshes with the “Pimp my Ride
school of health care that Ian Morrison has been writing about
(although one column a month doesn’t make Ian a real blogger!). Tony
Chen at Hospital Impact thinks that perception is more important than we give it credit for being, and that things would be different if a big rodent from Los Angeles got involved in the hospital game. Tim Gee who usually writes about technology at Medical Connectivity Consulting keyed in on the problem of ensuring that only appropriate admissions end up in the ICU and CCU. AggravatedDocSurg and MSSPNexus Blog
are bickering about whether JCHAO, which is the main body which
inspects hospitals and is a tool of the industry/a regulatory body
attacking American health care(delete where applicable to your view), is The Borg or the Death Star.

Maybe technology will come to the rescue. Clinical Cases and Images Blog wants to build a Google for all medical knowledge, or rather wants to open all medical knowledge behind closed “doors” to Google. David Williams at The Health Business Blog wonders if the way to cut radiology costs isn’t to send all diagnostic reading overseas. Meanwhile The Difficult Patient thinks that physicians may be using interesting but not necessarily new decision tools at the point of care.

The two other big news stories this year were of course Katrina and the birds

New Orleans/Katrina: Hsien-Hsien Lei at healthcare.wurk.net shows that it’ll be a long while
before the healthcare system in New Orleans is back in action. Enoch
Choi, a doc at Palo Alto Medical Foundation spent a lot of time down
there and his blow by blow account at MedMusings is well worth reading. Sart here and move on day by day.  Finally In her own words has a nurse telling about her experiences volunteering for the Red Cross in Baton Rouge.

Avian Flu: Tara Smith at Aetiology had the best history of pandemic influenza.

Late arrivals (added 12.30 PST Dec 28)

When cleaning out the junk mail, I found Bard Parker from A Chance to Cut is a Chance to Cure about whether the CT Scanner is a match for a duff appendix, Jim Hu from Blogs for Industry about skin conditions in the cartoon world, and Parallel Universes considering that drinking is bad for humans, while dancing boys are good for girls. Sorry that the first 1200 readers missed you guys, call Bill Gates and ask for a better Outlook filter with fewer false positives in 2006.

Parting Shots and gifts for reading this far….

Now just in case you over-did the holiday cheer and good food, you
may be thinking of a New Year diet. The nice people at the Discovery
Channel are having a National Health Challenge coming up starting on Dec 30. Go see their site for more details, but THCB
has three copies of this book on getting thin(ner) and healthier by the
perky looking Pamela Peeke to give away. Let me know if you want one
(and no I’m not getting a cut for advertising it…)

Health_bookcover

I will however get a menial cut if you want to get a THCB T-shirt or mug from my friend Shazza’s Vaniteez site.

41729572_B_tn

Thanks for coming by. Hope you enjoyed this extended edition, and
I’m looking forward to what 2006 brings us in the medical and health
care blogosphere.

Next week Grand Rounds returns to its more usual weekly format at Random Acts of Reality.

 

OFF-TOPIC: Here’s your feel good story for Christmas

A clerk working at Sees Candy lost her ring — a diamond encrusted family heirloom — thinking she’d let it slip into a bag of candy. There’s quite a bit of fuss in the Bay Area media about it, with appeals and all that, but realistically you’ve got to think it’s gone, right?

Yesterday a shopper was about to throw out their bag that they’d bought from See’s and in the bottom is the diamond ring. There’s even a reward that the shopper wants to be given to charity….

I’m tearing up. I may just have to watch “It’s a Wonderful Life” tonight…

 

PHYSICIANS/POLICY/POLITICS: Is cutting Medicare Part B fees a good thing? by Eric Novack

THCB’s favorite orthopedic surgeon Eric Novack is grumpy about Medicare’s proposed cuts in physician reimbursement, which are still up in the air as I write. Not sure how much support he’ll get over here on THCB, but it’s ironic that $10 billion is being set aside for health plans and PBMs to reimburse them for possible losses for their role in Medicare Part D, and hospitals are getting a raise. If we are going to cut Medicare, wouldn’t an across the board cut be fairer? Here’s Eric’s thoughts:
Unless Congress acts in the next week, reimbursement to physicians for services provided to Medicare recipients will be cut by 4.4%. The government’s formula for determining the payment rate does not take into account the increasing costs of healthcare delivery. Rather it is based upon such factors as the cost of prescription drugs and general economic factors over which doctors have no control. The reduction is not merely a reduction in the rate of growth of spending. Payments of $100 will become $95.50. And if the Congress’s inaction continues, payment will be less than $75 by 2011. No adjustments for inflation or cost of living are included.
Is all Medicare spending being cut? No, only payments for outpatient services- Medicare Part B- are affected.
Hospital care, paid under Medicare Part A, will get a pay increase of about 4.8%. Managed care plans that get paid by Medicare for managing Medicare HMOs will also get a raise. In both cases, the government’s formula for payment is based upon the medical economic index, which takes into account the costs of health care delivery.
Other than doctors, why should anyone care that reimbursement is going down? What options do patients and physicians have? Doesn’t more affordable mean more accessible?
Nearly 97% of US doctors participate in Medicare. This means that the doctor has signed a contract to accept the rates that the government says it is willing to pay for services. Doctors cannot be selective. They must accept the rate for any and all services that Medicare offers. They cannot tell patients that they will accept the contracted rate for one service, but not another. For example, doctors are not allowed to accept the Medicare rate for knee replacements, but not for hip replacements. This is especially an issue when it comes to the care of very complex conditions, as the level of expertise, time necessary, and potential liability is significantly increased, whereas payment is often only minimally higher than for the care of much simpler cases.
Physicians have several ways to deal with the Medicare cuts. They can retire and stop practicing medicine. Some will. They can see more patients each day, spending less time with each patient. Some will. They can stop practicing medicine and pursue other careers. Some will. They can limit the number of new Medicare patients they will see. Some will. They can drop out of Medicare altogether, requiring Medicare patients to pay completely out of pocket for healthcare services. Some will.
Patients have few, if any, options under the current structure of Medicare. Seniors cannot opt out of Medicare and find private insurance to cover care.
Government fixing of healthcare prices below reasonable market rates will create the medical equivalent of the gasoline crisis of a generation ago. The planned and projected Medicare cuts will have exactly the opposite of the intended effect: seniors throughout the United States will have less access to doctors and healthcare services.

TECH: JSK’s 2006 Health IT Forecast

Skip over to iHealthbeat to see the ever wonderful Jane Sarasohn Kahn’s 2006 Health IT Forecast

Jane is pretty gung-ho about ePrescribing. She says:

I predict that e-Prescribing will come of age in 2006. With Medicare kicking the tires on e-prescribing standards, we’ll see adoption of eRx on a selective basis. An innovative handful of health plans will foster adoption by providing incentives to prescribers in regional marketplaces. By the end of 2006, e-prescribing will reach a tipping point, and it will take off in 2007 because of Medicare’s push for adoption.

It’s not secret that we share this view — after all we spent last year writing a study about it that will be out shortly! this is one of the times when Morrison’s corollary to Herb Stein’s law comes into play. Stein said that “if something is unsustainable in the long run, it will end”. Morrison riffed on that to say, “If it’s going to be a big deal eventually, it’s got to start somewhere”.  We think that the next 18 months is the “starting somewhere” period for eRx. I hope that we’re not being too optimistic!

Jane is however a little too polite about RHIOs. Ann Donovan from the California RHIO told me last week that the CEOs of the big players in Claifornia were sending people to their meetings but the people showing up didn’t know why they were there. Reading between Jane’s lines this looks like CHINS all over again. The first report we wrote together in 1994 was also about CHINs, and we said there that they might end up as a sideshow, and again we were being too optimistic!

BLOGS/POLICY: My readers are way smarter than I am

The best thing about this year in THCB has been opening the comments up for discussion, which was actually a function of changing hosts from Blogger to TypePad, and not part of some grand design. Although certain themes have been overly repeated (and you know who you are, Ron), the overall quality of the discussion in the comments has been excellent, especially in last weeks EMR discussion, and in yesterday’s responses to what was really a throwaway piece about the tax-deductability of health care benefits. Having spoken to several of my regular commenters, and having had email back chats with many more, I can only say how impressed I am. Take a look at both of those threads and see the variety of high level discussion, arguments and counter arguments.

I am only saddened by the fact that this type of discourse (the intelligence rather that the civility of it) is so far way from being typical in American political life. That’s why in my own small way by starting a column over at the political site Spot-On I’m trying to, so to speak, bring it to the masses. But long may THCB stay a place where the smart health care wonks can thrash out the big issues.

TECH: Interesting post on physician IT education

Tech-over-achiever Shahid Shah’s new IT aggregator blog — the HITSphere— has started up a community feature that’s well worth tracking. Several people have started their own blogs there and one is an MD called Mike. He has some interesting things to say about how to get doctors to the point that they can “learn to love the EMR”. His piece is called: Healthcare IT, Informatics and GME: Are We Doing Enough? Go take a look but here’s a flavor.

If we teach our future physicians the basics and give them the tools to self-teach in the future, they will be better equipped to adapt, optimize and lead. Future challenges related to standards/inter-operability, languages and security should not be left entirely to non-physicians. We as a group want functional cost-effective solutions and so we should be willing to invest in that future by training leaders to help guide us.

TECH/CONSUMERS: Joe Paduda is nice to Steve Case

Here’s Joe Paduda on Steve Case’s strategy for Revolution Health

Loyal readers know I have been less than impressed with Case’s strategy, team, and acquisitions to date. While I admire the audacity, I question the judgment.

Joe is too nice.

It’s all very well Case going to talk to Warren Buffet about this. The guy he should have talked to was Jim Clark who said exactly the same things as Case is saying now in 1995 before he started HealthEon. Luckily for Clark the stock market insanity enabled HealthEon to buy up some real companies with their valuable paper despite the fact the company had basically no revenue and no products that seemed to actually work. Amazingly enough they didn’t completely kill their acquisitions in the process—although it was a damn close run thing. Case tried the same thing with Time Warner when AOL bought it….and it survived but as a very wounded beast.

Still if he wants to piss away his $250m or whatever, it’s up to him. But perhaps he should talk to someone who knows something about health care first.

However, if he really wants to change the system he’d have been better off taking either Bill Gates’ approach or trying to agitate for a political solution like Philippe Villers did with Families USA.

QUALITY: Can a hospital CEO get us all to integrate (medicine, that is…)

This is pretty interesting. A fairly hard nosed hospital CEO, under it appears the tutelage of his new wife, gets into alternate and preventative medicine. 

Three years ago, Treuman Katz got some troubling news: At 60, he was on his way to becoming a diabetic. Katz, CEO of Children’s Hospital & Regional Medical Center at the time, could have relied on the region’s top specialists. Instead, the man who had spent nearly 40 years running two of the country’s pre-eminent hospitals reached out to a naturopathic doctor. He took herbal supplements, changed his diet, started yoga and hired a naturopathic trainer. Soon, his blood sugar dropped and he began to feel healthier than he had in years, he said.

Fair enough. But then he tries to integrate it with the care his institution delivers.

That opportunity came five years ago, when Katz and his medical staff
started to notice an intriguing trend: More than half of their patients
were using natural medicine but not telling their doctors. Therapies
ranged from herbal supplements to acupuncture.

So Katz organized a small group of physicians to visit Bastyr to
start connecting NDs — naturopathic doctors — and MDs, Molteni said.
Brown-bag lunches with Bastyr naturopaths followed. The hospital put
together a group to study how herbs could affect drugs. It hired two
anesthesiologists/acupuncturists and will work with Bastyr to bring on
a chiropractor, a naturopathic doctor and a traditional
Chinese-medicine practitioner within the next year or two.

I live in a city with more than 70 yoga studios and probably more than 300 acupuncturists, so there is something going on in the alternate care movement that deserves some level of integration with tradition western care. This might be one approach that makes sense.

assetto corsa mods