THCB

The Smarter Healthcare Consumer Myth

If consumers could review and shop for health care coverage as easily as they do television sets, costs would decline and we wouldn’t have as large a health care crisis. At least that’s what some folks would lead us to believe. But the picture isn’t that clear.

A recent article in The Wall Street Journal reports how companies are using private health insurance exchanges to lower costs and give employees more flexibility. The exchanges are similar in nature to those mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare)—the difference being a private company is overseeing the exchange and not the federal government or states. Employees are able to log on to a site, review coverage plans with different benefits and a range of deductibles, and choose what works best for their budget.

A consultant running one such exchange was enthusiastic about its progress thus far. “When people are spending their own money, they tend to be more consumeristic,” Ken Sperling, national health exchange strategy leader for Aon Hewitt, a unit of AON Plc, told the Journal. (Aon itself, as well as Sears Holdings Inc. and Darden Restaurants are using a new Aon run exchange.) Benefits consultants Mercer (part of Marsh & McLennan Cos.) and Buck (part of Xerox) are rolling out similar private exchanges.

There’s no doubt that consumers are more astute, on average, regarding price for benefit when directly paying for goods and services.

With insurance companies acting as the middleman and cutting deals with providers as they see fit, consumers rarely even know the actual cost of a medical service. That lack of knowledge has fostered a world of outrageous price discrepancies– for instance, an ankle MRI can run you anywhere from $400 to $1861 in a mere two mile radius of Washington, D.C.. Such discrepancies are particularly egregious since higher prices do not necessarily equate to better quality of care.

However, the notion that access to prices alone will enable consumers to choose suitable coverage makes two big assumptions about consumers:

(1) that they are in a position to accurately identify and predict their healthcare needs.

(2) that they won’t be inclined to value the short term (i.e., more money in their pocket each month due to lower health insurance premiums for higher deductible plans) over the long term (i.e., access to health care treatment they can actually afford when they most need it ).

The stark reality is that both of these assumptions are wrong.

And affordable access is key since research shows that the underinsured aren’t that much more protected than the uninsured, and thus exhibit much of the same behavior that over the long term leads to higher healthcare spending when they can least afford it. As the Healthcare Hacks blog reported few years ago:

“…53% of underinsured people (compared to 68% of uninsured ones) do not see the doctor when they are sick, do not fill their prescriptions and do not get recommended tests or treatments because of the high out-of-pocket costs that they have to incur. That means that they are foregoing or delaying needed medical care. Moreover, 45% of them have difficulty paying their medical bills, have been contacted by collection agencies for unpaid bills and have changed their lifestyles to pay their bills. In fact, a 2005 study by Harvard University showed that 75% of medically-related bankruptcies occur for people who have health insurance, i.e. the underinsured.”

This isn’t to say that health care exchanges offer no benefit to the consumer. More flexibility in plan choice can give consumers access to services that are important to them. And clearly defined plans (as the Affordable Care Act envisions) can ensure they are educated about what exactly they are paying for and how best they can use those plans. But exchanges are not a panacea and, frankly, can do more harm than good by accelerating the number of underinsured without also protecting the consumers from literally gambling with their health. And that’s a gamble not even the House wins. We all lose.

Author’s note: John S. Wilson analyzes health policy for a state Medicaid agency. The views expressed here are personal and are not those of the state.

John S. Wilson is a health policy analyst focused on long term care and digital health. His work frequently appears in Forbes, CNN, Black Enterprise and the Huffington Post. He is also a Digital Health advisor to the NewMe Accelerator, a start-up tech incubator for minority entrepreneurs. John may be reached on Twitter: @johnwilson. This post originally appeared in Forbes.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

16
Leave a Reply

5 Comment threads
11 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
Josejordan SHLAINSandra_RaupAquiferJohn Wilson Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Jose
Guest

Have these politicians buy into Obama care as well…If they pay into public retirements, medical benefits, and the salaries as middle class Americans would that change the way anything including Obama care is being implemented?

jordan SHLAIN
Guest
jordan SHLAIN

As I recently stated in https://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/tag/jordan-shlain/
we cannot conflate consumer engagement with patient engagement – there is tons of ‘risk’ that can be cut from the system if both patients and physicians (the system) engage in a meaningful dialogue.

CJ
Guest
CJ

It is difficult to compare and understand the details of various plans, and even harder to predict future health care needs. The ACA may offer some improvement around the edges, but a system that puts the interests of shareholders before the interests of patients is fundamentally immoral. We have to more toward an efficient, evidence-based single payor system that is aggressive about prevention if we want to solve the health care problem long term.

John Wilson
Guest
John Wilson

CJ, single payer is intriguing but I don’t think the political will is there. Insurance companies are just too powerful.

Aquifer
Guest
Aquifer

John – it would seem if SP is a better system, and polls show that a majority of people would favor it, then it appears the “political will” we are talking about lies in Congress and the White House – so it would further seem that changing the “political will” to that amenable to SP consists in changing Congress and the White House. Considering that both major parties are inimical to SP (as well as other things we desperately need), methinks we should be concentrating our energies on ousting them and replacing them with those who will go where we… Read more »

Peter1
Guest
Peter1

Insurance costs are mostly based on risk. Exchanges or not, the risk of the pool is a constant. How does an insurance company offer a lower price – (1) by negotiating lower prices from providers, (2) managing their pool to have lower risk, (3) by accepting less profit, (4) by cutting benefits, (1) When insurance companies want to attract providers what do you think the sales pitch would be – lower reimbursements, not likely, unless you’re the only game in town. (2) Under the ACA they have to accept all comers and not rate pre-existing. (3) How do you think… Read more »

John Wilson
Guest
John Wilson

Great points Peter.

Sandra_Raup
Guest

How about if an insurance company set up “Expedia for Healthcare”? I think there are ways to make it way less expensive!

Peter1
Guest
Peter1

” I think there are ways to make it way less expensive!”

How Sandra? What changes: risk, profits, administration, benefits, provider reimbursements?

Sandra_Raup
Guest

Consumers making better decisions because they’re better informed; avoiding high cost and repetitive tests because they aren’t necessary; avoiding high cost complications because mistakes are avoided; I could go on and on but I know it will take a different mindset on the part of consumers and healthcare providers. Many of the things done in other countries could easily be implemented here. For example, many times in the UK a patient is expected to try PT before extensive testing and medication is given – with the thought that many problems are self-limiting, anyway, and a little PT doesn’t hurt. Or… Read more »

Peter1
Guest
Peter1

All that from Expedia Health care? We’re not booking vacations you know. When your doctor orders a test(s) what medical knowledge will the patient draw on to say, “Hey Doc, I don’t need that test – you don’t know what you’re doing.” When you’re under anesthesia and there is a high cost complication when do you alert the surgeon? “many times in the UK a patient is expected to try PT before extensive testing and medication is given” Fair enough, who changes that, the doc or the patient? What expensive medicines can be deemed unnecessary by PT? Ever look at… Read more »

Sandra_Raup
Guest

Peter,

I guess time will tell. I’m hopeful that consumers will start to figure things out, and physicians and other clinicians will start to realize that their patients will want and begin to demand more efficient and more convenient ways to meet their needs.

One clinic I really love to keep tabs on because they are so innovative is Neucare Family Medicine in the middle of Kansas. I hope it catches on!

http://neucare.net/NeuCare/Home.html

Peter1
Guest
Peter1

“One clinic I really love to keep tabs on because they are so innovative is Neucare Family Medicine in the middle of Kansas.”

“NeuCare is an independent practice and does not participate with any third-party health plans.”

“Currently, we can only accept Medicare patients whom are enrolled in Advantage (Part C) Plans,”

“We do not participate in any Medicaid plans”

Membership:

under 29 – $10/mth, 30 over – $20/mth

Family membership – $50/mth.

+ Visits: phone/web – $10, Clinic – $20 15 minutes

House calls – $100

Other fees. etc, etc, etc.

Sandra, what problem does this clinic solve?

Sandra_Raup
Guest

Have you heard people complain that they don’t know about costs of healthcare visits? Although it doesn’t include hospital or specialist care, it allows patients to clearly understand what they will pay for services is they don’t have comprehensive insurance. And you have access to house calls – I’ve not seen that as something easily accessed at least here in MN. Maybe where you are that happens all the time. What does it solve for the clinic? He doesn’t have to bill, and I believe that saves him a lot of admin expenses. That way he doesn’t have to charge… Read more »

Peter1
Guest
Peter1

“Have you heard people complain that they don’t know about costs of healthcare visits?” People who have insurance don’t care about “cost” but they do know their co-pay. They also know they aren’t required to pay for a membership where they pay even if they don’t use the service. I’m uninsured and it’s not hard for me to find out before hand what the doc’s visit is going to be. His clinic may be better for uninsured if they can afford the membership, especially if they have a cronic condition requiring lots of doctor visits. “it doesn’t include hospital or… Read more »

Healthcare Professionals In Casselberry
Guest

Better to good medical than cheap one | Great post “If consumers could review and shop for health care coverage as easily as they do television sets, costs would decline and we wouldn’t have as large a health care crisis. At least that’s what some folks would lead us to believe.”