Physicians

Doctors in Congress

When new members of Congress are sworn in this January, there will be a total of 19 doctors in Congress – 3 Senators and 16 Congresspersons. That will be a 27% increase over 2009,from 15 to 19, in doctor members of Congress. These doctors will make up 3.5% of the 535 members of Congress, but will fall far short of the 10.7% who were signers of the Declaration of Independence.

Eighteen of the 19 new members are Republican. This may say something of the mood of America towards health reform, but it may have little effect on whether the health reform bill is repealed or retained in its present form.

Fifteen of the 19 are from the South or West, 5 are Ob-Gyn specialists, and 12 represent specialties who perform surgery. What this means or portends I do not know. Perhaps they will not hesitate to perform surgery on the bloated national budget and cut deficits. I take solace in recent polls, which indicate 77% of the public trust doctors to do right thing vs. 11% who trust Congress.

Here is the list of the 19 doctors in Congress:

Senate Incumbents

  1. Tom Coburn (R, Republican), Oklahoma, family physician and ob-gyn
  2. John Barasso (R, Wyoming), orthopedic surgeon New Senator
  3. Rand Paul, (R, Kentucky), ophthalmologist

House Incumbents

  1. John Boustany ( R, Louisiana), cardiovascular surgeon
  2. John Fleming (R, Louisiana), family physician
  3. Bill Cassidy (R, Louisiana), gastroenterologist
  4. Tom Price, (R, Georgia), orthopedic surgeon
  5. Paul Brown (R, Georgia), family physician
  6. Phil Gingrey(R,Georgia), Ob-Gyn
  7. Ron Paul (R, Texas), Ob-Gyn
  8. Michael Burgess(R, Texas), Ob-Gyn
  9. David “Phil” Roe (R, Tennessee), Ob-Gyn
  10. Jim McDermott (D, Washington), psychiatrist

New House members

  1. Larry Bucshon (R, Indiana), thoracic surgeon
  2. Andy Harris (R, Maryland), anesthesiologist
  3. Dan Benishek (R, Michigan), general surgeon
  4. Nan Hayworth (R, New York), ophthalmologist
  5. Scott DesJaris (R, Tennessee), family physician
  6. Joe Heck (R., Nevada). emergency room physician

Richard L. Reece, MD, is pathologist, editor, author, speaker, innovator, and believer in abilities of practicing doctors and their patients to control and improve their health destinies through innovation. He is author of eleven books. Dr. Reece posts frequently at his blog, Medinnovation.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Physicians

Tagged as:

21
Leave a Reply

19 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
17 Comment authors
Alberta Young-PabonTom GibsonRosaIcemanDave Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Tom Gibson
Guest
Tom Gibson

I would like to know what help each of these doctors received from the AMA to get elected. I accidentally stumbled accross a web site a few years ago for the Washington State AMA that advertised itself as a school to help doctors get elected to office. What was the curriculum and world view of that training I wonder. More raving anti-communism and anti-government like we heard from the AMA in the first half of the 20th century like when they fought against the passage of Medicare? Now that Medicare has firmly established the fee for services system they are… Read more »

Iceman
Guest
Iceman

The people entering the medical field make huge sacrifices so they can get rich. Perhaps it’s a tough way but that’s a personal choice. Odd that this country under it’s crappy corporate system requires almost twice as long to become a M.D. as most european nations. And the U.S. healthcare system is one of the worst in the industrialized world. Medical Doctors in the USA for the most part are nothing more than drug salesmen. As for tort reform: Put a limit on damages and there will be far more damges to patients. The courts are presently our only defense… Read more »

Dave
Guest
Dave

@Fat Bastard

You are merely another example of someone so perniciously selfish and jealous that you cannot abide doctors making a good living for the incredible sacrifices they make to enter the medical field. To say that doctors in the GOP deserve rectal cancer…you are so despicable I cannot adequately express my disgust for you.

Fat Bastard
Guest

Doctors are a big part of the reason health care in the US stinks. I hope the GOP doctors in CONgress all get rectal cancer and suffer suffer suffer. They deserve it and worse.

rahul2010
Guest

In Louisiana, there are special procedures which must be followed in
medical malpractice lawyer louisiana . For example, in Louisiana, a claim must be filed with the State before a lawsuit can be filed. This claim is then reviewed by a panel of three Louisiana doctors, who give an opinion about whether any health care provider .Only after the panel has reached its decision can a lawsuit be filed. There are many complicated details to this Louisiana panel procedure, and many traps for the inexperienced Louisiana attorney.
http://www.gallagherlawfirm.com

Bill
Guest
Bill

With doctors in Congress–perhaps we can get true health care reform: All U.S. citizens should have the same health care as each member of Congress….afterall, it is the taxpayers who subsidize their health care premiums, no? Does anyone in Congress reject the Government health care policy system and pay for their own? I doubt it.

DeterminedMD
Guest
DeterminedMD

“Hell, being more aggressive on fraud in Medicare/Medicaid would yield more savings.” Another wonderful argument for saving money, start going after any and all providers who are considered frauds per billings. Google how this has been so effective and responsible, having harassed responsible and appropriate providers for not doting an ‘i’ or mistakenly put in the wrong code, codes that the GOVERNMENT keep changing on us. And the lawyers doing this work will do it pro bono? Yeah, now there is a realistic thought!!! Pay attention who advocates for these kind of mindless quick fixes, as they aren’t so realistic… Read more »

hwilliston
Guest
hwilliston

The only meaningful way to control health care spending is to illuminate how we are spending the money now. To my mind that means publishing on the internet the amount of public money paid to each medical provider per patient per year, addressed to the now required universal billing number. This will give the health care provider some idea when they walk into a doctor’s office if it is selling Mercedes or Kias. This would also delineate which primary care providers are referring their patients to cost conscious specialists and which are referring to those who own immense imaging systems… Read more »

MG
Guest
MG

Tort reform (or at least the GOP version where you have a $250k hard cap on pain and suffering) will do next to nothing to slow healthcare costs or to benefit doctors or patients. Hell, being more aggressive on fraud in Medicare/Medicaid would yield more savings.

DeterminedMD
Guest
DeterminedMD

Readers, just watch out for the legal advocates here who want to dismiss and demean realistic calls for tort reform, because their lobby will be affected by it.
How fascinating, and equally repugnant, that there are those who so overty project their greedy agenda onto all physicians as the bad guys, yet have no negative commentary about the role lawyers play in this debacle of health care expenses.
Unfortunately, narcissism does not discriminate in professions as well. I rest my case!

Paul
Guest

There is no need to worry. <a href=http://cheapshop.burnbellyfats.com/asthma-medicine-usa.html rel=follow>Modern ASTHMA meds will help in a couple of days.$
At BBB Blog you can share results with your mates.

Peter
Guest
Peter

“To be sure, I do not “know” with “absolute certainty” what tort reform would do for patients or if it would reduce their premiums. But, based on the Kessler and McClellan estimate of a 5% to 9% reduction in medical expenditures, there is reasonable chance these costs reductions could ripple down to reduced patient premiums.”
Show me in states (including TX) that have tort reform where this occurs? There is no trickle down – Reagan Myth.

Rosa
Guest
Rosa

As a physician, I can assure you that getting rid of frivolous suits can only help the situation.

Andrew
Guest
Andrew

High Performance Health Care – Learn from two recipients of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award and help your health care organization take it to the next level. The Center for Performance Excellence at Poudre Valley Health System (part of Poudre Valley Health System – 2008 recipient), and the Monfort Institute (part of the Monfort College of Business at the University of Northern Colorado – 2004 recipient) will give you the tools and best practices you need to improve your leadership and your organization. Join us at the Foothills of the Rockies March 10-11 or June 9-10. Learn more: monfortinstitute.org/STP_HC_Main.html

Richard D
Guest
Richard D

Sorry: in my post above, I meant to say that conventional tort reform is small potatoes even using the Kessler McClellan numbers. I managed to stick in a ‘not’ by accident.

Richard D
Guest
Richard D

Thanks for responding. There was a paper in Health Affairs by Michelle Mello that took the Kessler McClellan estimates and showed that it resulted in a max saving of 45-50b dollars. See here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20820010 The Texas number that you cite is a little misleading: you need to also tell your readers that the growth rate of premiums fell everywhere (ie, not just in Texas). My point is not that conventional tort reform is small potatoes. The physicians in Congress will cite the same papers and numbers that you have, but if you do the extrapolation more carefully, it doesn’t get… Read more »