HIE Guide for the Perplexed

HIE stands for Health Information Exchange. Sometimes the term HIE is used to describe the act of exchanging health information, sometimes HIE is used to describe the infrastructure which enables the exchange to occur and sometimes HIE is used to describe an organization that owns the infrastructure which enables the act of health information exchange. HIE (the act) is supposedly the holy grail of Health Information Technology (HIT) and the enabler of “an EHR for every American by 2014”, which in turn, will bring about better health care at lower costs and, by leveling the playing field, will reduce disparities in care.

The Government, through ONC, has awarded over $547 million to various States to create regional HIE (organizations). The fledgling new State HIEs (the organizations) are busy screening and purchasing HIEs (the platforms) and defining the rules of their local HIE (the act). There are several HIE (platform) vendors, notably Medicity and Axolotl (recently acquired by Ingenix), but even Microsoft and IBM are trying to make inroads into this fairly new market. In a parallel process, ONC is busy defining national standards and regulations for HIE (the act).

There are two basic models for any information exchange and HIE (the act) is no different.

The Centralized Model – All information creators/editors/contributors push their content to a centralized repository, preferably in real time, and all users/readers pull the information on demand from said centralized repository. This is the infamous “database in the sky” which houses every American’s medical records. Conceptually, this is the simplest model to understand. The Government will buy enough hardware to set up clusters upon clusters of databases, define the exact data elements and documents to be stored, assign a national identifier to all of us (physicians too) and finally publish specifications for pushing and pulling data securely. Every EHR vendor and medical information supplier (such as labs and pharmacies) will build the necessary web services and integrate them in their technology and we will all live happily ever after. However, other than the obvious monumental technology challenges involved in maintaining such infrastructure, Americans tend to experience significant discomfort with the concept of Uncle Sam having unfettered access to so much personal information and the obvious privacy issues it raises.

The Federated Model – Health information is maintained where it is created, be it physician offices, hospitals or other agencies of care. Contributors push content to users if they want to and readers pull content from contributors when they need to. The best way to think about this is to compare it to telephony. You call me when you need information from me or when you want to share with me information you have, and I do the same. This of course implies that we speak the same language and know each other’s phone number and if we don’t, we have a way to look it up somewhere. It also implies that we both have an agreed upon method of identifying the people we are discussing, e.g. cousin Jamie is my aunt Sarah’s daughter, not your uncle Bernie’s oldest boy. This model requires something akin to White and Yellow pages for providers, as well as unique identifiers for patients, and an agreed upon method to “make phone calls” or push and pull information.

And then, of course, you can have multiple hybrid models, which are somewhat centralized and somewhat federated. The Government funded State HIEs (the platforms) could be regional databases in the sky, or regional telephony networks with associated directories, both serving as federated super nodes on a national network of networks. The advocates of patient controlled medical records would suggest that PHRs should be the basic units of a federated model and nobody gets to gossip about cousin Jamie except cousin Jamie, who at my request will tell you as much as he/she chooses to tell you.

So what are we building out there? We are definitely not building the centralized national database, that’s for sure, but we seem to be engaged in building a little bit of everything else, and we are not starting from scratch.

Pre-HITECH HIE (the act)

Before Meaningful Use became a capitalized term, there where all sorts of HIEs (the acts) going on. Providers with halfway decent practice management systems (most providers) were sending out almost all claims electronically, receiving electronic remittance and checking health plan eligibility for patients in real time. Most accomplished this wondrous HIE (the act) through claim clearinghouses, such as Emdeon, RelayHealth or Gateway EDI, which have built very sophisticated national HIEs (platforms). On the clinical side, anyone with a Surescripts certified ePrescribe module could send prescriptions to most any pharmacy in the nation, receive refill requests and complete medications lists for insured patients, all electronically with a click of a button. Just like the claim clearinghouses, Surescripts created a national HIE (the platform), complete with provider directories and algorithms to identify patients. The national reference laboratories were not far behind and most physicians with an average EHR could send lab orders and receive results electronically from LabCorp and Quest. A host of regional labs were quickly following suit and hospitals were not far behind. The newest trend consisted of electronic clinical summaries in CCR or CCD standard. These were starting to gain some traction as a means of communication with PHRs, such as Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault and here and there files were exchanged between EHRs. It is important to note that clearinghouses charged physicians only a nominal fee (some were free), Surescripts was free to doctors and so were reference lab interfaces.

Enter HIE (the organization)

Although HIE (the act) was occurring, it wasn’t spreading fast enough to meet the 2014 goals, so the Government decided to sow the seeds for organized regional HIE (the act). The first order of business for these State HIE (organizations) is to enable HIE (the act) of prescriptions, structured lab results and patient summaries, which are all requirements for Meaningful Use. Why would they need to do that when physicians are expected to adopt certified EHRs which already have those abilities? For a while now I’ve been puzzled by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) requirements for ONC certification of EHRs. Unlike the comprehensive CCHIT certification, NIST does not require that a certified EHR be connected to Surescripts and it does not require standard capabilities to interface with national labs. Why not? Because the Government funded State HIEs (organizations) are intended to insert themselves between the physician EHR and Surescripts or LabCorp and later probably claim clearinghouses as well. What used to be a simple point-to-point web service, just turned a bit more complicated, and what used to be free to physicians, will be so no more because HIEs (the organizations) must become sustainable businesses and will charge fees for transactions.

Perhaps it is all worthwhile if these newfangled HIE (organizations) can somehow foster comprehensive national HIE (the act). While State HIEs (organizations) are selecting and deploying various HIE (platforms), using various privacy and security policies and a multitude of directory structures (which may or may not be shared) and various standards of communications, it is expected that all will become federated nodes in the overarching Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) which is itself under construction. [I understand that the NHIN is just an incomplete set of specifications, but for some reason, I have this vision of thick, black rubber cables crisscrossing the country.] In the meantime, a more nimble sibling of NHIN, namely NHIN Direct, is also taking shape by proposing to use a completely different and much simpler addressing and transport construct, similar to email, which will allow physicians to send unstructured information to one another, presumably outside the HIE (organization) scope. Concurrently, the historical clearinghouses and Surescripts networks continue to flourish and function as before. In addition to the official State HIE (organizations), there are other private HIE (the act) efforts sprinkled around here and there, which may or may not be inclined to connect to State HIE (the organizations), and some large EHR vendors are starting to run their own proprietary peer-to-peer networks across organizations. Every HIE (platform & organization) is promising “seamless” integration of all these conflicting initiatives.


Long ago and far away, in the miraculous country of Shinar, all of humanity decided to build a tower so tall that it will reach heaven. Recognizing that people united by good communications are sure to succeed, the Almighty, who opposed this particular venture, disrupted work by fragmenting the one accepted standard of communications. Since the StarTrek Universal Translator was not in existence at that time, humanity became confused and the mighty tower was never completed. Thus, to this day, humanity is wondering around this earth perplexed at their inability to build tall enough towers.

Margalit Gur-Arie blogs frequently at her website, On Healthcare Technology. She was COO at GenesysMD (Purkinje), an HIT company focusing on web based EHR/PMS and billing services for physicians. Prior to GenesysMD, Margalit was Director of Product Management at Essence/Purkinje and HIT Consultant for SSM Healthcare, a large non-profit hospital organization.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: , ,

Leave a Reply

23 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
12 Comment authors
doudoune enfant monclermoncler pas cherdoudoune homme monclerveste moncler enfantmoncler chine Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
doudoune enfant moncler

manire dans laquelle ils avaient t enseigns . Il a fait de moments passionnants et exprimentales . Anciens ” tudiants rvoltantes sont devenus professeurs et trouvent souvent qu’il est trs difficile d’accepter et de traiter avec les lves rvoltants , et il y avait des moments o les choses semblaient chaotique , billiga moncler jackor , sombre et anarchique .moncler jacka stockholm Hook NortonLe principal avantage de serrures magntiques est leur capacit tre utilis en tant que partie d’un systme de scurit lectronique entier . Plusieurs fois, une serrure magntique seront attachs un lecteur de carte magntique , moncler butik… Read more »

moncler pas cher

personne de crer un chemin d’accs dans plus de dcider le fait que la couleur s’adapte votre propre teint. Nanmoins qu’une veste Moncler ne sera pas beaucoup de c’est pourquoi poignets tempte sont essentiels pour les poignets. Alors que l’aide mise en place en rapport avec ces sortes de mois, le nombre de vtements confortable merg connect avec revtement parce que les vtements en ce moment qui vous conserviez confortable est une demande dans les mois. Avis possible mail compact briller parce que mon chat personnel a que le bois difficile. Ces types de manteaux restent proximit de l’ensemble du… Read more »

doudoune homme moncler

il vous offre amour et blason à l’époque précitée ! Comme les produits d’hiver , Moncler publicité abondante articles Moncler modifiées couvrent Moncler , Moncler anorak et doudoune Moncler . Mais l’affectation d’agrégation Moncler est généralement une entreprise de fabrication de classe mondiale . Pas cher Moncler est une superbe action pour accumuler cette activité animée dans un grand nombre de mode de division . Moncler anorak vers le bas si vous coupez une douce et chic, vous ne serez pas en mesure de l’adulation l’aplomb et aswell la personnalité de Moncler anorak pour vous accompagner . En obtenant une… Read more »

veste moncler enfant

Les resultats de l’ pourraient secouriste à la Loyauté , polo blouson moncler Femme pas cher, l’ engagement et renforcer le Soutien des Fonctions organisationnelles AINSI Qué l’ Affichage d’ Une voix Distincte employee honnête Qui Profite à la société DANS ensemble de fils . Guerre civile et à Une époque Où Les Femmes n’avaient Pas de voix , ELLE une vision Exprime juin de grande Qui a Touché le domaine du leadership . Elle à Presente Les concepts Qui définissent le Contexte situationnel de la direction Qui se composer de Ce Qui Est Nécessaire versez le moment.Doudoune Moncler neo… Read more »

moncler chine

Moncler gamme de meuble a rempli l’acceptation des hommes et des femmes soit mme. La gamme de Moncler comprend des vestes, accessoires, swalert :: s, T-shirts, veste Moncler, pantalons etc Moncler a mme une gamme complte que les enfants. Doudoune Moncler sont trs pris une position de hauteur notable en raison apt les moyens et la qualit de tentative Doudoune Moncler pour les hommes comprennent ordre faveur Maya Jacket comme les hommes au milieu de pourpre, Moncler Outlet, Moncler Branson Down Jacket Grey Hommes, Hommes Doudoune, Moncler Gilets , Moncler Veste noire, Moncler Outlet Store, Moncler Himalaya Doudoune Blanche et… Read more »

invest liberty reserve

Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of HIE Guide for the Perplexed | The Health Care Blog . Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly return.

natural remedies

I think articles like this are the best, when they are actually fun to read while staying informative and are you want about me please visit http://www.herbalcureindia.com and http://www.ayurvedicherbalcure.com


Thanks Margalit for spelling out clearly and concisely the HIE challenges. Being in IT for 20 plus years I have lived these challenges implementing similar types of initiatives (e.g. Enterprise Resource Planning(ERP)Customer Relationship Management(CRM) and Decision Support Systems(DSS)). The challenges you describe are very real, the Government has an opportunity of a lifetime to standardize on the policies and protocols allowing the vendors to provide the best platforms technology has to offer (that meets the standards) and may the best vendor(s) win. Leadership and standards are the keys to successful HIE!

Merle J. Bushkin

Suresh, send me your contact info. Would like to talk with you. My email address is mbushkin@healthrecordcorp.com.

Suresh Kumar
Suresh Kumar

Nice Article. Once the HIE and NHIN gets established with all of the governance, security etc…Then all providers/patients/caretakers will benefit! But to get there will be the biggest challenge. Lots of solutions providers in the market, the bigger the vendor (allscripts and above) the more the costs and the lesser the providers and the patients would embrace them! Got to be simple, cheap, standardized and provide core features. Merle: Personal devices are good for privacy and security, but what about practicalness, research, intelligence etc. Also what standard is it stored in? XML? Discrete data once imaged becomes less meaningful so… Read more »

Merle Bushkin

Margalit, if you visit our website, medkaz.com, I think you’ll find answers to most of your questions about how patients and doctors use the MedKaz™ System — and how it works for them. The operative word here is “system” since the MedKaz device is but one part of a system that includes what we call a Patient Record Manager (PRM) for the provider who keeps paper records (think EMR-Lite), and a web portal and server that give our system extraordinary flexibility. The MedKaz device is self-contained. It includes both the applications and data. When the doc plugs it into his/her… Read more »

Margalit Gur-Arie

I think peer-to-peer is the right way, but I do have problems with the “patient controlled” part of this proposal.
Those patients that are so inclined should be able to aggregate and control their records, but for the vast majority who is unwilling and mostly unable to do so, I would prefer that someone is designated as the responsible party for aggregation (even if it is just-in-time aggregation). My obvious choice would be the current PCP.

Mark Spohr

Interesting piece from today on this same blog that seems to endorse a distributed peer-to-peer model for health information accessibility.

Margalit Gur-Arie

…and one more thing: can I upload my USB files to the Internet and give my doctor access?
I don’t know about you, but I lose one of those USB things every other week….

Margalit Gur-Arie

Merle, One of these days you will have to explain to me how MedKaz really works. I understand the portability, but I don’t quite understand the usability of it from a provider perspective. For example: Do I have to load up the USB data each time I see you and do I have to work in your copy of it? What if I have an EHR already, do I have to copy and paste? What if I want to look at your records when you are not there (say some labs just came in)? What about hospitals? Finally, all providers… Read more »