Reader mail: EMR advice from an IT insider

JD’s comment on a recent post was so excellent it deserved re-running.

Large medical systems generally have implemented EMRs while small, independent practices have not. It’s not a government or socialism thing. That 13% EMR penetration statistic masks a huge disparity between the bulk of physicians in 1-3 person practices and the minority of physicians in large practices (or at hospitals).

The EMR problem reflects on a larger problem of fragmentation in the US medical sector that serves no purpose for the larger public interest. The Mayo clinic manages to offer some of the highest quality care in the US, does cutting edge research, has some of the lowest rates of unnecessary resource utilization, and pays its doctors a salary. Those things are not accidentally connected (well, the cutting edge research part is).

Given the huge lift necessary to move physicians into integrated delivery systems, I’m not holding my breath that it happens soon. There are things that can be done with private practices, but they present challenges of their own.

One relatively unheralded effort I’ve been involved with is New York City’s Primary Care Information Project, which is providing a good, standardized EMR at highly subsidized rates (over 50%). These EMRs are equipped with public health-directed enhancements like connections to disease and immunization registries and reporting of HEDIS-like data. The plan is to link them in a health information exchange and allow for more sophisticated (and easy to administer) pay for performance or value-based payment. The physicians involved are in small private practices and public health clinics.

But it is a huge slog to get these physicians signed up in the small private practices. For some physicians, the comprehensive EMRs are almost free and yet you have to talk to 20 doctors to get a single one to sign up. It’s not just resistance to change. There is also an attitude among some that they’re making enough money as is, and doesn’t need to make any change. There is a resource problem: these offices have just a couple staff people who aren’t very technically proficient.

This is a big problem. Sometimes staff will undermine your effort to get in touch with the physician because they don’t want to be bothered, and also because they suspect (rightly) that their jobs may be in jeopardy. A large practice can reduce administrative FTEs by about 1 per physician. How this translates into a small private practice is a vexed issue. Do you fire one of the three staff people who have been working with you for years and feel like family? Or maybe your staff actually are family members. Sometimes the solution is to turn one staff member into a part time worker, though that can create its own dramas and problems for solo practices. But if you don’t let anyone go or reduce FTEs, you aren’t going to save money on your EMR.

Problems like this obstruct progress in EMR implementation less in a large institutional context where letting people go or retraining is easier, where tech support is a whole department, where people can spend time thinking about the strategic direction the EMRs serve and can engage in a formal RFP process to at least have a better chance of not getting stuck with a loser EMR, and where large capital investments can be more easily managed as part of the corporate planning process.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Physicians

Tagged as: , ,

Leave a Reply

6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
EMR TrainingJohn LynnGary Levin MDjdPookieMD Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
EMR Training

Good written…. Thanks for the post.

John Lynn

It seems like so many people forget some of the no brainer benefits of EMR. Possibly because they are so apparent, but they can’t be understated. Things like legibility of records and availability of charts. The problem is that those things are very valuable, but can’t be given a nice ROI number.
I agree that I haven’t seen many (if any) EMR that have done a good job of being physician focused. However, considering the crazy insurance billing demands, it’s no wonder that it’s taken over the EMR development process.

Gary Levin MD

I agree with most of what the writers above have said. However they have left out one critical component…regarding ethnology, or the structure of the human-machine interface. Can the physician use it comfortably at the physician-patient interface….. Also neither of the comments address the functionality that a physician needs, ie, the ability to enter a complete, and cogent history and physical without diversions regarding administrative details. Is the basic financial system integrated, and reliable to get a report at the end of the day about encounters, billings, payments, and/or a day sheet for reconciliation with deposits, refunds, etc. I cannot… Read more »


By the way, now that Matt (or whomever) has been so kind as to put my comment on the front page, I should stress that I am not employed by the Primary Care Information Project nor do I speak on its behalf. I have had the good fortune to work with them as one of their many partners in expanding EMR use in New York City.


You are right that I am not an MD. I have spoken with several about their experiences with EMRs, and of course I read complaints all the time on this blog and elsewhere. I do not claim that EMRs save physician time, and in the beginning they clearly slow things down. A well-designed EMR that has had the office workflow intelligently re-shaped around it should result in a roughly equal number of visits per day. It will speed up some things and slow down others from your point of view. But from the point of view of the system as… Read more »


I suspect who ever wrote this was NOT a physician. I have worked with two EMRs in the last 4 years. The hosptial that implemented the first EMR has saved money on the backs of the physician–we now do order entry, so the hospital could get rid of all the ward clerks! Doing order entry adds between 10-20 minutes to each admission, as I search for appropriate “prn” reasons, lab panels and answer dietary questions, “can the patient use the phone to call the kitchen?”. This is not effective use of my time. I think the resistence to EMRs by… Read more »