EMR implementation — a saving grace or year of hell?

A friend of mine sent me this link – "Beware of the EMR ‘Ponzi scheme,’ warns physician leader" — earlier this week. The article starts off by saying:

Healthcare IT does not necessarily make life easier for
primary care physicians, says a leader in the movement to make medicine
more efficient and patient-centered.

"When you put an EMR into a primary care practice, your life is hell for the next year," said L.Gordon Moore, MD.

"EMR vendors aren’t really giving us what we need. We have to make a
distinction between a robust EMR with decision support tools, and one
that is just being marketed as a way to improve coding. And we really
need to get out of the E&M coding game."

Yikes. I’ve been in the health care IT market for a while and that’s
probably one of the strongest anti-EMR statements I’ve seen publicly.

I know many readers are physicians — how many of you concur with Dr. Moore?

Shahid Shah is a health care consultant, specializing in IT. He blogs regularly at The Healthcare IT Guy.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Physicians

Tagged as: , ,

Leave a Reply

8 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
Sara RileyMark MetzlerVijay JainAlex MarcuPatrick Case Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Sara Riley
Sara Riley

EMR has cause our practice to drastically slow down. The amount of tedious clicks the doctor has to go through to get his work done is overwhelming. The idea of EMR is very different from the reality of it because in the end it is NOT making out work mor eefficient. It is burning the physicians out. Very disheartening to say the LEAST.

Mark Metzler

Here is a new website you might want to consider:
Biomedical Device integration Tech Cormer
“An archive of technical documents, protocols, standards and procedures useful for clinical engineers and IT professionals involved in biomedical device integration and connectivity to electronic medical records (EMR)”

Vijay Jain

All comments about EMR mentioned above are obviously true. However, EMR system including: software, implementation, hardware component, storage, etc. etc. truly depends upon the following: • Standing of the company, who developed the product, • IT company who is implementing and supporting the product, • Who are end users. A mental determination to implement the system is required even before someone thinks about EMR. Even in a doubtful situation of this determination, none of the system works. All system have pluses and minus, Each IT company have pluses and minus, and same case is true for each user. There are… Read more »

Alex Marcu

I agree and fully support the statement made that currently EMR implementations are hell. It starts with the initial installation which is costly and time consuming. Hardware is necessary but not the right hardware is chosen. It all comes from the way the EMR software was designed. Most EMR software systems out there are client-server based or web based. In the client server case the underlying technology is usually Microsoft which means that cost needs to be added to the overall implementation. In a sense a clinic needs to incur cost before the EMR vendor can charge their set amount… Read more »

Patrick Case

Check this out!!!!

Greg Starr MD
Greg Starr MD

I firmly believe as the gentleman has stated above. Current versions of EMR’s ar awkward, diorganized, difficult to use and unsuitable for practice as we have it today. Its really not surprising, medical information have defied computerization for the last 20 years. It’s very likly that the right system hasn’t even been examined yet. Problems that the current systems tend fail on are rational, organized physician entry and recovery (the idea of the system is to unload the menial burdens from the physician can do what he is trained for. Data storage in a flexible secure way is another problem.… Read more »

Jessie A.
Jessie A.

My company is doing something that may be of interest to this group. We’re hosting a town hall meeting about healthcare reform and electronic health records. The meeting is scheduled for Dec. 1 at Seattle’s Town Hall. For more information go to

J Bean
J Bean

That’s been our experience. We haven’t been using it for a full two months yet, but it has slowed us down immensely (or at least you can see the same number of patient in a day, if you are willing to dedicate another 10-20 hours per WEEK to documentation) and it doesn’t offer much beyond coding. Hell, it doesn’t even really support coding all that well … there’s no way to glance at the day’s list of patients to see that you’ve submitted the charges and generated the damn “reports”. At least with my paper billing sheets, even though I… Read more »