- The type of sing molecular analysis to achieve optimum medical outcomes in the
management of a patient’s disease or disease predisposition,
- Right treatment for the right patient at the right time.
As I have mentioned in several of my posts, I have been working on a
couple of health care finance reform initiatives over the last six
months. After banging away now for awhile, I am starting to see some
emerging ideas that are starting to bring out that old revolutionary
feeling of doing something that can have an industry changing impact.
The opportunity lies in the ongoing pace of innovation, with new forms
of health care delivery, with new models of health care financing, and
that fact that eh American public and politicians are slowly waking up
to the fact that our health care system is headed toward radical surgery (not the cosmetic kind).
So lets start this out by talking about the personalization of medicine.
This is typically thought of in a genetic sense, wherein people are
customizing medications and therapies based on your individual genetic
profile. Said in other words, the “Right treatment for the right patient at the right time”.
However, most consumers already assume Right/Right/Right is happening,
and more likely consider personalized medicine as a type of practice
delivery style. This is where the physician knows the patient
intimately, their social and demographic context, and the correct
diagnostic or therapeutic approach given the patient’s preferences that
have been learned throughout the relationship. The only physician I
have ever had whom I had this type of relationship with was Dr. Richard Jones who took care of me from age 6-21 (when the front office lady finally told me that I “really should find another doctor“).
Dr. J, as he was affectionately called, had a personal interest in our family. Not only did I play football with his son throughout my
school years, but he was always available to to see us at a moments
notice. He was larger than life in our home – he expertly took care of
coughs, earaches, nosebleeds, annual physicals, immunizations,
concussions, and nearly every other ailment we could bring to him`. He
was an excellent diagnostician, compassionate clinician, and very
efficient with his time and practice. As our team physician, I got to
know him as a second coach, a counselor, and someone who could console
in times of defeat and share the joy of championships. In fact, more
than any single factor, Dr. J influenced me to go into medicine because
of the significant impact that he had in my life. I looked up to him as
a role model, as an advisor, and as a friend. The relationship was
time-tested, absolutely trusted, and he represented someone and
something that I aspired to be.
However, that was not the world that I would find years later when
going to medical school. The late nineties represented the first major
backlashes against both nationalization of health (aka “HIllaryCare
v1.0″) as well as the oppressive managed care regimes. The physicians
that trained me and my classmates were angry, bitter, decrying the loss
of the “golden era”, and just plain burned out. The Dr. J’s of the
world were being forced onto a 7-10 minute treadmill, procedure
focused, and RUC enhanced schema
that perverted the primary care practice style that has been shown to
increase health care value. The entire E&M coding concept, the fee
for service, “do more get paid more” delivery model supported by RUC
reimbursement methods (and its 24 out of 29 specialist committee
members) has led to a dramatic DECREASE in VALUE (outcomes/price) by dramatically driving up the “price” part of the equation. In addition to driving up price, (which was initially combatted and later retracted through the managed care “spasm”)
the problem has been that even with all the increasing costs there has
been very little change the overall health outcomes. Research by Wennberg, and books like Overtreated and Crisis of Abundance effectively make the case against the specialist and procedure intensive “Premium Medicine” currently practiced in America.
But all that is beginning to change. Just as data drives discovery,
medical evidence can and should drive medical practice. The evidence is
showing that our current cultural expectations, third party payment misincentive system, and malpractice litigation
environment are creating the perfect storm for healthcare reform. The
winds of revolution are being buoyed up by the pioneers of health care
delivery reform, and a return to when becoming a primary care provider
delivering true health care (preventive care and wellness) versus
“disease care” (what is currently practiced) is actually cool. Its the
“going green”, renewable wave as applied to health care. I have
documented the first wave of hip new doctors, now better equiped through technology to deliver highly personalized care (personal
health records, predictive practice analytics, and evidence based
treatment sensitive to individual cultural, demographic, and contextual
preferences) who are reinvigorating the entire field of primary care which has unfortunately languished for decades (not for a shortage of solid physicians!). When added alongside payment reform (initially beginning as cash payment for services), and ultimately the realignment of incentives (through market forces supported by an appropriate regulatory environment) and reassignment of work tasks (appropriate utilization of physicians and other trained healthcare providers (RN’s, NP’s, etc), primary care has an opportunity to survive in a modified form.
So we are back to where we started 50 years ago. Trusted primary
care physicians using technology to delivery highly personalized and
effective medicine that their patients value and are willing to pay for
– now that’s a future Dr. J could be proud of.
Scott Shreeve is a physician and entrepeneur based in Laguna
Beach, California. After a long career in medicine, Scott founded the
open source electronic medical record company MedSphere. He currently
serves as entrepreneur in residence at Lemhi Ventures. If you enjoyed
this piece you may also enjoy his earlier piece examining the potential
impact of Long Tail economic theory on the healthcare industry. Scott is a frequent contributor to both THCB and the Health 2.0 Blog.
He blogs regularly at CrossOver Health.