Code Blue! Republicans leaning left on healthcare! Craig Stoltz

Health08Craig Stoltz is a web consultant working in the health
2.0 space. He has previously served as health editor for the Washington Post and editorial director of Revolution Health. He blogs at Web 2.0 … Oh really?
I recently had a hand in a project, called the Healthcare08

, which seeks to find meaningful
distinctions among the presidential
candidates’ healthcare policies. This was tougher than it sounds.

This being the primary season, each party’s contenders are pretty
much sticking with the approved script. The Democrats are trying to outbid each
other for cradle-to-grave healthcare for all humans treading on U.S. soil. The
Republicans are quietly uttering free-market shibboleths to avoid alienating
their big contributors until the fall, when they’ll probably have to promise to
do something or other.

The PoliGraph project plotted each candidate’s stances on
six healthcare issues on big graphics. We plotted their positions along two
axes: from left (i.e., federalphilic) to right (federalphobic), and from most
important to least important (to the candidate, not us). 

By parsing the data carefully, we were able to find some
daylight between candidates, even within each party’s tight ideological clusters.

For instance, for all the fuss over comparing Clinton’s and
Edwards’s personal “mandates” that
people have insurance, when we dug into her plan we found her solutions more inclusive
of market forces than either Edwards’ or Obama’s. (This gets wonkish, but Hillary
gives small businesses incentives to
offer private insurance coverage to employees;  Edwards and Obama depend more on mandates and
expanding public programs to fill that gap. Hey, it’s something.)

But the most interesting thing that showed up when we got
done plotting everybody jumped out in plain red and blue. Several Republicans
held positions in the blue zone on some healthcare issues.

For instance:

John McCain is code blue drug prices, his positions
essentially no different from the Edwards/Clinton/Obama scrum: Let Medicare
bargain for drug prices, permit drug imports from other countries and give
federal support to develop generic drugs.

Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani are tap-dancing quietly in the
blue zone on stem cells. Romney says it’s okay to use stem cells left over from
IVF treatments for medical research, but doesn’t want federal dollars to fund
it. Giuliani generally supports the use of embryonic stem cell research and is
even sanguine with federal funding. But they are both keeping awfully quiet
about it. At least until the general election.

Of course, life being complicated and politics being
political, some folks were really hard to pin down on a simple left-to-right
axis. Ron Paul is against federal funding for stem cell research but apparently
has no objections to the practice itself. Is that “left” or “right”? (As is
often the case with libertarians, maybe it’s neither and both and har-de-har!)

And Democrat Mike Gravel’s views are, how you say, all over
the graph. Is his a-health-insurance-voucher-in-every-pot plan a pinky ploy to
go Canadian? Or is it a way to pump federal dollars directly into the pockets
of private insurers, and stealthily destroy Medicare and Medicaid?

Luckily, since it’s Gravel’s idea, we’re very unlikely to
find out.

We’ve decided to continue the PoliGraph project to plot the
changes in the candidates’ views on healthcare issues all the way through
November, when of course there will be only two candidates, (give or take a

What do you bet they’ll wind up nearly on top of each other
in the middle of the graph?

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: ,

Leave a Reply

9 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
Craig Stoltzhealthcare lean trainingrbaerGlennjohn Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Craig Stoltz

Thanks to everybody for the engaged comments about our project. Let me shed light on a few of the issues raised here, and on our methodology for placing the candidates. 1. Yes, it was extremely difficult to figure out what values to assign to each candidate. We took into account a variety of criteria, including written proposals, additional statements in debates and public forums, elaborations in the press, various “independent” analyses, and previous record of voting and policy actions. Trying to figure out how to weigh each of these was a mind-twister: Do two votes against a Medicare proposal push… Read more »


“It is alway interesting to read how healthcare and politics intertwine.”
Life and politics intertwine.

healthcare lean training

It is alway interesting to read how healthcare and politics intertwine.


“I’d argue that candidate positions on stem cell research, FDA reform and related issues are very important factors in understanding what these folks are talking about — perhaps as important as their positions on universal coverage.”
John, stem cell, FDA reform (Repugs created the need), don’t even come close to real healthcare reform – in the struggle for cost containment, access, affordability, transparency, accountabilty, the other issues are side shows meant to muddy the waters.


Craig wrote: “The Democrats are trying to outbid each other for cradle-to-grave healthcare for all humans treading on U.S. soil.” I don’t think that the snotty tone fits here. Even GWB appears to acknowledge that medical care is something close to a human right or, providing it is society’s duty to some degree (given his misguided “if you don’t health care, you go to the ER” remark). More importantly, I find the “left to right” ranking a little unhelpful, not only in general, but for this particular topic. I am relatively new to this blog, but don’t most writers here… Read more »


I continue to be at a loss as to why “universal healthcare” is such a major issue. Maybe I’m just fortunate that I’ve lived between the UK and Australia most my life so haven’t had to worry. While I don’t think either system is ideal, I certainly wouldn’t trade either for the US based user pays system. So why do so many Americans not like the idea of having accessible healthcare for all? Admittedly, measures have to be put in place to make sure those that make an active effort to be healthy aren’t disadvantaged. Subsidies for extended private cover,… Read more »


“Left of whom, Attila the Hun?” That’s just silly Peter. Your comment highlights the fact that different groups define healthcare in very different ways. Is universal coverage the only healthcare issue worth talking about? You seem to think so. I think that’s a dangerous and short sighted way of looking at the universe. Craig has done a good job of examining at the candidate’s healthcare proposals across the board. I’d argue that candidate positions on stem cell research, FDA reform and related issues are very important factors in understanding what these folks are talking about — perhaps as important as… Read more »


“Code Blue! Republicans leaning left on healthcare!”
Left of whom, Attila the Hun?
Republicans believe individuals should help themselves out their own problems – not the government. Except of course when Republican investors find themselves in a self created mortgage/stock crisis created by their own greed and lies.


The author has a right to his opinion .. but it runs contrary to most of the authors on the WaPo op-ed page (e.g., Dave Broder, E.J. Dionne).
Then again, let’s not allow reality get in the way of a fun, happy headline.