This is bizarre, but both Wal-Mart and the SEIU want the employer-based health insurance system to end. So apparently today they’re going to agree about that.  Of course as Wal-Mart has a completely fungible workforce, any attempt to make it pay for  its employees health care either via a pay or play system, or by increasing taxes, will lower its profits. And so it has vigorously opposed any pay or play attempts, and has forced the rest of its unionized. health-benefits providing grocery competitors more or less into its line of thinking.(See this old chestnut about Wal-Mart vs Costco on that score).

So that the SEIU and other unions have backed them into a corner on this means one of three things . Either Wal-Mart is worried about its public image of being a dreadful employer. Or that it’s genuinely worried that its employees not having health insurance lowers their productivity. Or that it believes it can back a universal insurance plan that means someone else (presumably the taxpayer) will pay for its workers to get insurance and thereby get the issue off its back.

You can guess which one I think it is.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Leave a Reply

1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Anonymous Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted

Why does America have such a big health care problem? Since Walmart pays such low wages that often qualify people for welfare or Medicaid, they should be made to pay for these programs that the taxpayers subsidize. Walmart informs and instructs its employees how to sign up for Medicaid. Why should we the taxpayers be stuck with the bill for their low wages? In direct comparison to Walmart, Costco does an excellent job of paying its employees good wages and providing them with health care and many other benefits. The employer based health insurance system is in trouble for the… Read more »