8
Leave a Reply

8 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
pgbMDJack E. LohmanScottMiss KittyGregory D. Pawelski Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
pgbMD
Guest
pgbMD

http://www.cknj.com/articles/2006/11/13/news/news03.txt
Because of cases like this everyone that enters the ER with any type of chest pain will receive a 60 slice CT to rule out aortic dissection, CAD, etc. Just another piece in the complex puzzle why healthcare costs keep going up.
This is another big piece of the puzzle. “The hospitals and the doctors are not making any money to speak of, but the person in the middle, who is the paper pusher, is making all the money,”
http://www.syracuse.com/business/poststandard/index.ssf?/base/business-6/116323951182150.xml&coll=1

pgbMD
Guest
pgbMD

I work in the military and order multitudes of CTs, ultrasounds, and other imaging. No cash-cow or cha-ching here just practicing medicine. I would like to see a nonpartisan fair study comparing the use of imaging between the private sector and the military/TRICARE.

Jack E. Lohman
Guest

I remind you of the following letter on the subject of cash-cow testing….
http://www.wisopinion.com/index.iml?mdl=article.mdl&article=5463
It is criminal and must be stopped, but the special interests have blocked laws to change it.

Scott
Guest
Scott

Reponse to Miss Kitty- I’m curious by what authority are you making the statement ‘pts are being over-tested for over-billing’. I agree w/ Gregory that evidence based medicine needs to challenge everything we do, but be very careful of the generalization “doctors hear a cha-ching” for over-utilization. How about ‘if I don’t do a test, i.e chest CT for a mildly abnormal lab test (D-dimer), in the context of chest pain which clinically does not look like a PE, am I going to wind up in court next month for failing to rule out a diagnosis w/ a less than… Read more »

Scott
Guest
Scott

Reponse to Miss Kitty- I’m curious by what authority are you making the statement ‘pts are being over-tested for over-billing’. I agree w/ Gregory that evidence based medicine needs to challenge everything we do, but be very careful of the generalization “doctors hear a cha-ching” for over-utilization. How about ‘if I don’t do a test, i.e chest CT for a mildly abnormal lab test (D-dimer), in the context of chest pain which clinically does not look like a PE, am I going to wind up in court next month for failing to rule out a diagnosis w/ a less than… Read more »

Miss Kitty
Guest
Miss Kitty

Agree– patients are being over-tested mainly for over-billing purposes-
Doctors hear ca ching ca ching – when the patient has the slightest history to justify over utilization of testing procedures — and throw in a good insurance policy

Gregory D. Pawelski
Guest
Gregory D. Pawelski

Serial radiographic imaging studies, CT scans, MRI scans, PET scans, and ultrasound, are very expensive tests. In cancer medicine, the idea of their us is to follow the size of the patient’s tumor while the patient is receiving repeated courses of chemotherapy to determine whether or not the treatment is working and whether or not different drugs should be given, instead. This is an entirely unproven benefit, and were appropriate studies ever to be performed, there wouldn’t be any measurable benefit at all, in terms of improving patient response to chemotherapy or patient survival with chemotherapy. No wonder health care… Read more »

Peter
Guest
Peter

Gotta a toy, gotta use it.