Uncategorized

POLICY/POLITICS/HEALTH PLANS: HSAs for Medicare? Crazy but apparently true

So the HSA ideology has wormed its way into CMS, and now Medicare is seeking proposals for its Consumer-Directed Health Plan demonstration. Those taxpayers who can do basic math might wonder why you’d want to to give healthy Medicare beneficiaries cash for health services that they’re not going to use, while taking that cash away from the pot that pays for the sick beneficiaries that do use said services. But we’ve asked that question so many times before and no-one on the free market side dare answer it. And I guess you might say, why not give the taxpayers money straight to the “healthys” instead of laundering it through Medicare Advantage plans as we’re doing it now so that they can hand out free gym memberships to seniors and boost their executives’ stock holdings.

But given that risk adjustment is coming to Medicare Advantage, it may be that that gravy train is ending. Perhaps we’ll get to see if the private plans really can stand on their care management merits—and there’s so much fat in Medicare that they ought to be able to, easily.  Although they failed to do so in the late 1990s.

However, it’s just bizarre to increase the costs of a tax payer funded universal risk pool by allowing people who are not paying into it to withdraw cash from it. So the only real explanation is that CMS and its political masters in the White House are eventually intending to put the entire system into a high-deductible plan and not fund the amount below the deductible.  Just the same as most employers are doing (as I explained in this Spot-on piece about Intel).  That of course makes perfect sense for the government and the taxpayer. Until, that is, the seniors find out! I wouldn’t want to be in charge of Medicare when that happens, remember what those seniors did to Rostenkowski!

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: , ,

6
Leave a Reply

6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
Robert FreitasMatthew HoltWilliam A Dolan, MDNarayanachar S.MuraliPeter Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Robert Freitas
Guest
Robert Freitas

Having had the misfortune of having had an HSA account by a previous employer, I would have to recommend against using them for anyone under any cirmcumstance. My experience was that the only people who make out with the HSA’s are the fund manager’s. We had JP Morgan Chase Bank, and they just ripped us off at every opportunity, and they did it completely “legally”. The entire concept of HSA’s is just a scam in itself!

Matthew Holt
Guest

William. Stick aruond. You’ll find plenty of criticism of the lilly gilding around the rest of the system, and–believe it or not–support for the concept of dctors leading the future of the health care system.
But no one–least of all most doctors–seriously believes that the AMA, with its century long track record of opposing universal health insurance and spiking attempts to create it, is serious about it now. If you want to believe that, how about you tell me what happened to the AMA’s support for the Clinton plan in 1993-4? Case closed.

William A Dolan, MD
Guest
William A Dolan, MD

Your Sept 13th piece on the AMA “Pushing Patients Around” is way off the mark. Obviously you have taken a few correct facts and mixed them in with MANY INCORRECT IDEAS to present only your point of view,rather than the facts,& without understanding true AMA policy, to paint a piece of abstrct art of your own feelings. The AMA supports Universal Health Coverage especially through Individually Selected & Owned Health Insurance, supported by Tax Credits. (these could be advanceable in case of the poor). This would allow more individual responsibility in choosing ones own health insurance and attention to the… Read more »

Narayanachar S.Murali
Guest
Narayanachar S.Murali

Gone are the days of the successful Nigerian Scammers. we now need to be wary of the CMSS and the health insurance industry. Every day we see more new scams. Matthew is on the dot as is Peter. As providers we are fed up. To some extent we doctors are to blame for this stupid mess. The most recent entrants to the “scammers Hall of Fame” are PBMs( Pharmacy benefit managers) who change our prescription but do not want to take responisbility for practicing medicine without licence. The amount of paperwork they generate and the wasteful telephone and fax time… Read more »

Peter
Guest
Peter

“The most likely end game of this is the collapse of our traditional insurance system, with eventually a government-backed universal payment system taking its place. But between here and there is lots of torment, as Intel – and all of us – make rational individual decisions which add up to what is sure to be a collective disaster.” Does the insurance/provider industry recognize this and are just making sure they can pull out as much money now as they can while the gettins good? I read an article that forecasted that at least 50% of baby boomers retirement income will… Read more »

Tom Leith
Guest
Tom Leith

> CMS and its political masters in the White House are
> eventually intending to put the entire system into a
> high-deductible plan and not fund the amount below the
> deductible.
Maybe you are on to something: back-door means-testing in Medicare. I am not against it.
Risk-Adjusted Medicare Advantage + High(er) dedectible Medicare + Universal Eligibility + X + Y + Z ~= The Enthoven Plan
Can we solve for X, Y, & Z, thereby averting Grave Evil and rescuing the political masters from a legacy of ignomy?
t