Uncategorized

TECH: Will Silicon Valley invade health care? by Andy Kessler

Andy Kessler is a finance guy who’s worked on Wall Street and ran a hedge fund. And like a rich-man’s Michael Lewis, he’s written a couple of books about Wall Street and the money world, and, following down the path that Maggie Mahar’s taken, he’s moving onto health care (presumably before he finds something more interesting like baseball! His book is called The End of Medicine: How Silicon Valley (and Naked Mice) Will Reboot Your Doctor. Andy saw my recent talk  at PARC and decided that I ought to know about his views, and they’re at the least provocative. So here’s a taster:

Will Silicon Valley invade health care?

By ANDY KESSLER

What the heck is a tech and finance guy like me doing sniffing around medicine? Well, I think IKessler_good_1 figured out that the way to save the $2 trillion healthcare industry – it’s for people to not get sick by getting doctors out of medicine. After spending the last few years following doctors and radiologists around, visiting cancer centers and spending time watching mice get poked and prodded, I’ve realized it is time to embed the expertise of doctors in silicon and software. Why have radiologists read mammograms to find 1 in 200 that have breast cancer? Today, a third of mammograms now have their second read done by computer, computer aided detection from companies like R2 and iCad, and for $29, much less than a radiologist, and perhaps more accurate. For me, that’s just a start. But I was astounded to learn that CT scans are on the same learning curve as PCs and iPods and cell phones. One slice per rotation moved to 4 slice, 16 slice, 64 slice and soon 256 slice CT scanners. Instead of film, the output is a high res color 3D model. Beats a blood pressure reading and cholesterol number, which is all that physicians can manage. They are flying blind.So I started running the numbers. State of the art scans are still close to $1000. Say 1% of adults have heart attacks every year. A stent procedure runs about $15,000 just for the stent, with the hospital stay and bandaids, you are in for closer to $20-30,000, let alone lost wages and productivity. Heart scans today are around $1000. So if you screen 100 people, it costs $100,000, certainly more than treating the 1 in 100 heart attack patient. So,…, Blue Cross won’t pay for scans. It is better for them if nature does their screening for them, you or I actually having a heart attack – ding, ding, ding, we found our 1 in 100.They probably still wouldn’t pay if the scans were $500. But they might at $200. And they certainly would pay at $100, because it would be cheaper to screen than to pay for care. Because it is on the silicon learning curve (down 30% every year, 50% every two years), it is pretty easy to see $100 scans within five years, probably less. Heart attacks and stroke may become a thing of the past.And cancer, the third member of the Big Three in healthcare spending? Structural CT scans will transition to molecular imaging to find cancer early. I can see biomarkers on antibody chips that can eventually sell for $1 or maybe even 10 cents can detect unique cancer proteins in blood and flag cancer early enough for much cheaper treatment, beating symptoms by five years.Doctors can’t do that. In the end, I believe that Silicon Valley will do to doctors what ATMs did to tellers.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as:

19
Leave a Reply

19 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
15 Comment authors
kellyRealitologyL.L. BerryBennatalie Hodge Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
kelly
Guest

we need to take care of our health , as we are been affected by nature , due to human’s invasion on nature .

Realitology
Guest

The bottom line is we need to make *health* the primary focus of healthcare instead of profit! That would solve most of the problems.

Realitology
Guest

The bottom line is we need to make *health* the primary focus of healthcare instead of profit! That would solve most of the problems.

L.L. Berry
Guest
L.L. Berry

IGNORE THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN
My best friend’s wife went to high school with Andy, so I’ll try to be gentle.
Relying on technology to do medicine is akin to relying on technology for education and teaching.
Nice theory for the ivory-tower crowd — lot harder in the real world. Too much v’bility — insurers get nervous — sorry, Charlie.
Keep trying, Andy. You may hit paydirt. And your old pals at Chemical Bank say ‘hi.’

Ben
Guest
Ben

The adoption of technology to healthcare will eliminate society’s need for doctors no more than the aviation industry’s adoption of all kinds of technological bells and whistles has eliminated its need for pilots. Technology is a means to an end. Kessler confuses it with the end in itself. With more sophisticated technological tools available to MDs, the market for tech savvy doctors who know how to use the technology and effectively integrate it with plans of care will only expand. You can see this today with the medical industry’s adoption of electronic medical records. Doctors’ newfound access to clinical information… Read more »

natalie Hodge
Guest

Boy, everyone is so worked up over here. What healthcare needs is a version of “Blue Ocean Strategy” Watch as Personal Pediatrics reinvents the lost art of pediatric house call medicine. We are a marriage of high tech systems and service to provide children excellent care where they are most comfortable, in the home. ( No matter what blue cross blue shield says) Our system is so customized, user friendly, streamlined, that our customers don’t CARE whether their outdated warped full coverage insurance will cover for our services. Remember insurance covers in 2006 for an hour wait to see a… Read more »

John Feeney
Guest

What a string of love. Does anyone actually think a guy from Wall Street knows anything other than numbers? Everything is paper, no consideration for a living thing. Replacing Doctors, how stupid. I have been attached to Silicon Valley for nearly 30 years. Regardless what comes out, “someone is getting replaced!”. No-One brings the fact up, A HUMAN WITH BETTER TECHNICAL SKILLS HAS TO RUNS THIS. Hence a total overall improvement of current status. Our only question is: why are patients not given a DVD of their records, images or scans. I asked for one from the same place I… Read more »

Tam
Guest
Tam

Prevention is the best medicine. Not a secret, known for years, taught in all health professions, never discussed openly (outside the classroom) in healthcare circles. To date, prevention equals no profit and often loss. Quality in healthcare(the new vogue) is a non-starter(read non-profit). Mr. Kessler hit it on the head, scale is key – make prevention profitable and we can improve health and quality of life while addressing the costs.

Sherman Sanchez
Guest
Sherman Sanchez

I agree in the comments shared by both Maggie Mahar and Dr. Eliastam. Technology is only a tool. The power of data mining, predictive modeling or computer aided detection is not just about real-time analytics, artificial intelligence or clean data. It’s about the business insight and professionals who understand what my problems are and how to solve them. We have become culture of creating products vis-à-vis creating solutions.

john
Guest
john

“The End of Medicine” The title says it all. This is obviously a take off on Francis Fukuyama’s (1992) “The End of History.”
Now there’s a book that’s really stood the test of time!!

The Medical Blog Network
Guest

My interview with Andy is up: Is “The End of Medicine” Coming? Interview with Andy Kessler.
Read it and you will see that hyperbole in the title is just a great way to promote the book, though it distracts a little from the real trends.
Medicine is not going to end, but advanced tech will surely continue changing it!

xizst999
Guest
xizst999

We call health care “health care” while it is really sick care. From the taster, I can see that Andy Kessler is interested in both technologies and prevention (screening). However, doctors and insurance company don’t think this way. A big change is needed in the reimbursement system to wake up most of the health care consumers.

Michael Eliastam
Guest
Michael Eliastam

We need a change ( a reduction) in the insatiable demand by us humans who will always want more healthcare for less out of pocket funds. This resetting of the demand will only come if we have a major event, like a war or a recession. Until then who among us individuals is going to willingly take less healthcare for the benefit of the community? Look at the antibiotic problem.

The Medical Blog Network
Guest

LOL, Eric and do not forget “angry commenters” who do not have their own blogs and have to vent on others’.
What part of healthcare is blessed with YOUR presence?

Eric
Guest
Eric

You forgot the generalization about self-promoting bloggers who write dime a dozen nonsense and go around feeling morally superior to MSM for no reason! Must be tough being wrong about stuff 90% of time and have no one call YOU out… LOL, dude.