Uncategorized

PHARMA/POLICY: One estimate of what Part D is wasting, with UPDATE

Dean Baker working under the auspices of the liberal Campaign for America’s Future has written a study of what is being wasted on Part D. His number is $80 billion a year!. Given that the whole program was originally supposed to cost less than $50 billion a year that’s quite some number! The number he’s calculated is (I think) the difference between what the government will pay now and what it would have paid if it was negotiating for the drugs at the VA rate, plus the amount the CBO says CMS is spending on private administration of the project above what it would have cost to simply add one sole plan to Medicare.

Whether or not this analysis is fair, the Dems are nuts if they don’t get a great sound bite out of this.

UPDATE: Of course one Dem, Henry Waxman, is watching.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

6
Leave a Reply

6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Cheri MacLean,RNGregory D. PawelskiMatthew Holteric Novack Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Gregory D. Pawelski
Guest

Let’s try it this way!

Gregory D. Pawelski
Guest

The secretary of health and human services says that more than 25 million people were receiving benefits under the Medicare Part D program. But the Boston Globe points out that according to Medicare’s own figures, the actual number of voluntary enrollees is MUCH smaller, about 5 million.
http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/articles/2006/02/23/medicare_numbers_at_odds_with_us_claims/

Cheri MacLean,RN
Guest
Cheri MacLean,RN

How is it that in the entire debate about Medicare part D, no one thought to ask the obvious question: do we really NEED to take all those drugs? The answer is a resounding “NO!” Our instant-gratification society always assumes a drug is the best solution for any health problem: it isn’t. We spend the vast majority of our drug dollars on drugs for type II diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, and depression. (I won’t mention all those improperly prescribed antibiotics we take for simple viral infections, that don’t work, and create drug-resistant bacteria, requiring us to search for ever-more expensive… Read more »

Gregory D. Pawelski
Guest

According to the Congressional Quarterly staff, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., said that he’ll offer a bill next week establishing a single nationwide premium for Medicare drug coverage. The proposal also would eliminate the “doughnut hole” in the standard Medicare drug benefit in which beneficiaries must pay full prescription costs. It also would give Medicare authority to negotiate drug reimbursement directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers. Kennedy said the changes would apply to coverage offered directly by Medicare and would compete with that offered currently by private plans contracting with the program. If the authors of the current Medicare drug law “are… Read more »

Matthew Holt
Guest
Matthew Holt

Eric my friend…this is not about reality, this is about creating a soundbite for November. Don’t forget, the Republicans don’t believe in reality so why should the Dems?

eric Novack
Guest

1. do you think that CFAF would reach any other result?
2. perhaps they could have compared it to the cost of NO medicare part D, but rather a means tested program forn those who actually need it.
3. Remember, the brilliant experts who hailed Medicare as the savior of healthcare for the elderly (back when 65 was actually older), claimed the cost would be $9 billion in 1980, when the actual cost was 10x!