Categories

Above the Fold

Health 2.0 Webinar with ONC


Health 2.0 Presents:  A Conversation with the
Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT

A Webinar featuring Joshua Seidman, Acting Director, Meaningful Use, Office of Provider Adoption Support, ONC


Health 2.0 and the
Health 2.0 Accelerator have teamed up to bring you a conversation with members of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT. On Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 1pm ET / 10am PT Dr. Seidman will discuss meaningful use and its implications for health IT at a physician and hospital level. In particular, his talk will cover the central tenets of meaningful use and how it aligns with an overall vision of health IT as a catalyst for improved clinical outcomes and efficiency. Other issues such as external innovation from an infrastructure based on MU architecture will be covered, as well as implications for consumers/patients. For more background, check out the Federal Advisor Committee Blog.

Register today at http://www.health2con.com/webinars/.

And don’t miss out on the next Health 2.0 event, Health 2.0 Goes to Washington!  More details at http://www.health2con.com/dc-2010/.

Making Sense of the NHIN

Thankfully, a new administration has come on board, new people have joined ONC and the bloated NHIN of recent history is getting a major rework – actually being split with NHIN referring more to the policy constructs that will define information exchange (the DURSA – Data Use and Reciprocal Support Agreement) and NHIN Direct, a much lighter weight technology stack to enable point to point communication.

Unfortunately, Chilmark has not had the time as of late (see previous post) to do a deep dive but while at the recent Governor’s Conference here in Boston, we bumped into Keith who works for GE and has represented GE in many of the discussions/meetings that ONC has held recently on NHIN and NHIN Direct.  Therefore, I asked him if he would be willing to write something on this topic, which follows below.  (Note, in conversations with some State Reps at the Governor’s conference, there is some significant consternation among many regarding the NHIN and NHIN Direct so this is far from a slam dunk for the feds – time will tell as to how this will actually be adopted and used.)

Continue reading…

Making Sense of the NHIN

By NIHN

The National Health Information Network (NHIN), which was the previous ONC head’s (Kolodner) top priority, or at least seemed that way is a concept that has its advocates and detractors.  To date, we have been more of a detractor as the original NHIN was a very heavy, top down approach by the federal government to establish a national Health Information Exchange (HIE).  Certain federal agencies loved the idea (e.g., Social Security Administration which has an embarrassing 18 month backlog of disability claims), but those in the field (local hospitals, RHIOs, HIEs, etc.) were not such a big fan of the concept.  Heck, we can’t even get RHIOs established, let alone an NHIN.  Adding to NHIN woes was its platform, built by beltway bandits with technology ill-suited to create a flexible, lightweight transport mechanism for the exchange of health information.

Thankfully, a new administration has come on board, new people have joined ONC and the bloated NHIN of recent history is getting a major rework – actually being split with NHIN referring more to the policy constructs that will define information exchange (the DURSA – Data Use and Reciprocal Support Agreement) and NHIN Direct, a much lighter weight technology stack to enable point to point communication.Continue reading…

Myths and Facts About Health Reform Part III

MYTH #1: In negotiations over reform, hospitals were forced to accept sharp cuts in Medicare funding.

FACT: In those negotiations, hospitals come out winners. They “were inside the tent very early on, negotiated a decrease in their Medicare updates that they figured out was acceptable” the Urban Institute’s Bob Berenson explained in a recent Health Affairs roundtable. (Berenson is in good position to analyze the changes: he was in charge of Medicare payment policy and managed care contracting at the Health Care Financing Administration – now called the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid– from 1998 to 2000 )

“And now [hospitals] are off limits until 2020 from the new board that is supposed to [make sure] Medicare hits spending targets,” Berenson added referring to the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) that will recommend ways to trim Medicare spending if it continues to grow faster than the Consumer Price Index. IPAB begins its work in 2014, but hospitals and hospices are exempt from IPAB”s proposals until 2020.

Moreover, while annual increases in Medicare payments to hospitals will be trimmed slightly, these cuts will be offset by the fact that hospitals will be seeing an influx of paying patients. Beginning in 2014, millions of formerly uninsured patients will no longer need charity care. Granted, the “Disproportionate Share Funding” (DSH) that many hospitals now receive to help defray the expense of caring for a disproportionate share of poor patients will be sliced by 75%, but a portion of the 75% cut will then be distributed back to hospitals, based on how much uncompensated care a particular hospital is still providing.Continue reading…

What’s Behind Today’s Primary Care Crisis? You Don’t Know the Half of It

By BOB WACHTER, MD

If you’ve ever been on a diet, you know that it really helps to keep a food log. Seeing your consumption chronicled in one place is illuminating – and often explains why those love handles aren’t melting away despite two hours on the treadmill each week.

In today’s issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, internist Rich Baron chronicles the work of his 5-person Philadelphia office practice during the 2008 calendar year. Rather than “Why am I not losing weight?”, Rich’s study aims to answer the question, “Why does my work day feel so bad?” The answer: an enormous amount of metaphorical snacking between meals.

In the NEJM study, Rich (who is a dear friend – we served together on the ABIM board for several years) found that each of the physicians in his practice conducted 18 patient visits per day (a total of 16,640 visits over the year for the practice). That’s not an unmanageable workload, you say. You’re right, but that was just the appetizer. On top of these visits, daily each physician also:

  • Made 24 telephone calls
  • Refilled 12 prescriptions (a vast underestimate of the daily refills, since a) the number reported in the study doesn’t count refills done during an office visit, and b) the study counted the act of refilling 10 meds for a single patient as one refill)
  • Wrote 17 e-mails to patients
  • Looked at 11 imaging reports, and
  • Reviewed 14 consultation reports.Continue reading…

Fake Facebook Profiles and Other Portents of the End of Times

One issue up for discussion in this evening’s free-form health care social media tweetchat was the fake Facebook page of eSara Baker, posted as a form of marketing for a company providing online health-related services (which sound like typical patient portal stuff like scheduling appointments and accessing test results).  The page prominently states: “If you haven’t uncovered our secret yet, here it is: Sara isn’t a real person.”

The identity of the company and the services provided are not at issue here.  The issue discussed in the #hcsm tweetchat was whether using social media to market a health care service through the use of a fabricated profile was unethical and/or harmful to authentic uses of social media for health care.Continue reading…

Why We Need Private Primary Care Doctors

Things have been busy in my absence.  A recent post on Kevin MD by Joseph Biundo, a rheumatologist, challenged my assertion that primary care doctors can save money:

(In reference to my claim) That may be true in theory, but I see patients in my rheumatology office every day who have been “worked up” by primary care physicians and come in with piles of lab tests, and x-ray and MRI reports but are diagnosed in my office by a simple history and physical exam.

Prior to that, an article in the NY times along with a post by Kevin Pho noted the fact that more solo practitioners are leaving private practice and joining hospital systems.  Why are they doing this?  Dr. Kevin suggests the following:

Lifestyle matters. More doctors are entering the workforce seeking part-time jobs in order to maintain a family balance. By removing the administrative hassles from their plate, they can go back to focusing solely on practicing medicine and coming home at a reasonable hour.

The NY Times article suggests possible benefits to patients:

In many ways, patients benefit from higher quality and better coordinated care, as doctors from various fields join a single organization. In such systems, patient records can pass seamlessly from doctor to specialist to hospital, helping avoid the kind of dangerous slip-ups that cost the lives of an estimated 100,000 people in this country each year.

So as a primary care doctor in private practice, am I soon to go the way of the dinosaur?  Is this simply a shift in the business model as demanded by the times, or should people be concerned?  Would the system function better with fewer primary care doctors or ones who are employed by large hospital systems?

Those who read my blog regularly (and those clever enough to read the title of this post) already know my answer: private primary care is essential for a healthy healthcare system.

Why Primary Care?

While I can’t disagree with Dr. Biundo on his point regarding the physical exam skills of PCP’s, I do disagree that this raises question of the cost-effectiveness of primary care.  In his case (the practice of rheumatology), there are few expensive procedures, the diseases are less common (compared to fields like cardiology and other high cost specialties), and the patients don’t spend a high number of days in the hospital.  One overnight stay for a cardiac catheterization will pay a large part of a rheumatologist’s salary for a year.

Like primary care, rheumatology is largely an outpatient practice, with success being measured by the ability of the practitioner to keep the patient out of the hospital and away from expensive procedures.  Lately, rheumatologists have started having biologic medications (like Enbrel) that are quite costly, but the number of people on this relative to the general public is still quite small.

Primary care, on the other hand, is the fountainhead of all healthcare costs.  A good PCP is also measured by patients staying out of the hospital and away from expensive procedures.  In general, a PCP is less likely to:

  • order an x-ray compared to an orthopedist
  • get an EKG compared to a cardiologist, or
  • order an endoscopy compared to a gastroenterologist.

There are some high-consuming primary care doctors, but much of the blame for this can be placed on the payment system that encourages expensive procedures and the ordering of tests.  For example, one of the PCP groups in our area has their own stress-testing equipment and CT scanner.  I am 100% sure that the physicians in this group order many more CT scans and stress tests when compared the physicians in my practice.  I am also sure that the care quality in my practice does not suffer from our lack of test-ordering.  Why?  Because the physicians are financially motivated to order these tests, making the appropriate business decision clash with the appropriate medical decision.  As long as it’s not harmful to order the test, the doctor can justify it.

Even these physicians, however, are not going to do any of these tests as much as a specialist, who depends on the presence of chronic disease to make a living.  The only specialists I have seen who are slow to order tests and procedures are those who don’t financially profit from their ordering: academic specialists.

Why Private Practice?

This brings me to my second point, which is the necessity of having primary care physicians who are in private practice.

Why do hospitals have an interest in hiring primary care physicians?  The answer is twofold: first, they allow them to negotiate contracts with the insurance companies in a position of strength.  Primary care is a must for most insurance contracts.  Patients will change insurance plans if their PCP is not on the plan, but they won’t do so nearly as much for specialists (with the possible exception of OB/GYN, which often act as PCP’s) or hospitals.  Plus, most insurance plans do their care management by requiring referrals, denying or accepting them being their means of cost control.  Primary care physicians are the referring physicians, and without them the hospital’s negotiating power is greatly diminished.

The second reason hospitals want PCP’s under their wing is that they generate business by ordering radiology tests, lab tests, and sending patients to specialists who will do expensive procedures in their facilities.  Primary care is a loss-leader to hospitals.  Hospitals make no money off of their PCP practices directly but make a huge amount from the referrals and procedures they generate.

This shifts the mission of the PCP.  The “success” of the PCP in the eye of the hospital system is not to avoid referrals or costly procedures, but to order them.  It’s not bad in the eye of the hospital that the PCP has higher hospitalization rates, it is better.

The Answer

The solution from an overall cost standpoint is to give primary care physicians incentive to do what they should be doing in the first place: keep people healthy and away from hospitals.  Any system that places too much value on procedures is going to fail at this, as the institutions and individuals who profit off of the procedures are going to fight for control of PCP’s.  Independent PCP’s who profit from keeping people well are the best thing for a system.

I have lived in both worlds: as a private PCP and as a salaried physician from a hospital.  I left the latter because it was clear that they had no interest at running my practice well and really just wanted me to be a turnstile into their money-making procedures.  It would be a big mistake to take away the one specialty that restrains cost.  We need to do the opposite, and encourage good primary care medicine.

Rob Lamberts, MD, is a primary care physician practicing somewhere in the southeastern United States. He blogs regularly at Musings of a Distractible Mind, where this post first appeared. For some strange reason, he is often stopped by strangers on the street who mistake him for former Atlanta Braves star John Smoltz and ask “Hey, are you John Smoltz?” He is not John Smoltz. He is not a former major league baseball player. He is a primary care physician.

THCB CEO denies improper relationships, payoffs

The Health Care Blog’s Founder & CEO Matthew Holt today announced a policy of absolute transparency concerning the rash of “inappropriate relationships” apparently infecting the health care blogging community. Holt released this statement:

I can categorically deny the truth of any rumors suggesting that anything inappropriate has been going on in the relationships between myself and any THCB staff members. While anonymous contributors may have uploaded perhaps unseemly photographic evidence to Facebook of such a relationship, I’m here to stamp out any rumors that the employee concerned was getting more than special treatment in other areas. I’d also like to state for the record that he is still on the THCB staff, and also that any treats he receives around the neighborhood are direct gifts from the giftees concerned over which I have no influence, and I am not paying off Maria at the Java House for her bacon treats.

Matthew Charley

Reached while sneaking off early on a Friday to coach Little League, THCB Managing Editor John Irvine was said to be quote “Extremely relieved” that Holt was not having any inappropriate relationships with staff members, as “there aren’t any other staff other than me!” and he “didn’t think I’d enjoy it very much."

Upon being informed that apparently other inappropriate relationships have led to large pay-offs and bonuses, Irvine changed his tune somewhat and started inquiring exactly what level of inappropriateness he’d have to put up with, and how big the bonuses were.

To Know and Be Known

I was happy when I looked at today’s schedule.

Two husband and wife pairs were on my schedule, both of whom have been seeing me for over ten years.  Their visits are comfortable for me; we talk about life and they are genuinely interested in how my family is doing.  They remember that I have a son in college and want to know how my blog and podcast are doing.  I can tell that they not only like me as a doctor; they see me, to some degree, as a friend.

Another patient on the schedule is a woman from South America.  She has also been seeing me for over ten years.  I helped her through her husband’s sudden death in an accident.  She brings me gifts whenever she goes on her trips, and also brings very tasteful gifts for my wife.  Today she brought me a Panama hat.

I know these people well.  I know about their past illnesses and those of their children.  I know about their grandchildren, having hospitalized one of them over the past year for an infection.  I know about the trauma in their lives as well as what they take joy in.  They tell me about their trips and tell me their opinions about the health care reform bill.

I spend a large part of their visits being social.  I can do this because I know their medical situation so well. I am their doctor and have an immediate grasp of the context of any new problems in a way that nobody else can.  This is not just in the context of their own medical ecosystem, it is in the larger family context.  This means that I know how to read between the lines when they say something – knowing what I can ignore and what subtle things are out of character.  This also means that I don’t have to practice defensive medicine – as I not only have a low risk of lawsuit, I also can rely on my intimate knowledge of them to keep excessive ordering of tests and referrals to a minimum.

That is the joy of primary care that doesn’t get talked about as often as it should: I have a genuine personal investment in my long-term patients.  I know them and am known by them.  It is also a much more efficient way to practice medicine.  I don’t have to order tests to get information when my personal information is so great.

A 21% cut in Medicare may have put an end to it.  When we were staring down the barrel of losing that much revenue, we seriously talked about our threshold for dropping Medicare.  The political game of chicken was not only played at the expense of physicians, it put great fear into many of my long-term patients that they would lose me as their doctor.  Yes, many of them would probably ante up and pay cash to maintain that relationship, but a new negative dynamic would definitely be thrown into the mix.  Some just couldn’t afford to pay me out of pocket (even with a discount).

We need a system that encourages relational medicine rather than discouraging it as our system does now.  Getting a bunch of mid-level providers in Walgreens is not the same as having an adequate primary care workforce.  I cherish my relationships with these people and they are, to a very large extent, the reason why I haven’t seriously contemplated dropping Medicare until recently.  I am a very important part of their lives – a stabilizing force that helps them deal with the difficulties of getting older and getting sick.  But they are an important part of my life as well.  I have a personal stake in their health because they bring me joy and connection.

After the visit, I gave the woman a big hug.  I was wearing my Panama hat.

My nurse says it would look good with my Jimmy Buffett shirt.

Rob Lamberts, MD, is a primary care physician practicing somewhere in the southeastern United States. He blogs regularly at Musings of a Distractible Mind, where this post first appeared. For some strange reason, he is often stopped by strangers on the street who mistake him for former Atlanta Braves star John Smoltz and ask “Hey, are you John Smoltz?” He is not John Smoltz. He is not a former major league baseball player.  He is a primary care physician.

ProPublica’s Pulitzer piss-take

In a decade when there are countless really, really important issues to investigate in health care, ProPublica took more than $400,000 and spent it on a rehash of a well known story. The story was about a completely exceptional circumstance that will likely never happen again. The original criminal investigation against the alleged perpetrator of the “crime” was abandoned. And the big important result that this new investigation caused in our health care system? Nothing.

This was a complete waste of resources in an era when very few are available to investigate the major issues in our health care system which cause so many problems for so many people. Could ProPublica really not think of any other major investigative health care story to pursue? Like one that impacts millions of people? They could have asked me for a few suggestions. Instead they went looking for something that was purely sensationalist, akin to the National Enquirer chasing down Tiger Woods.

And now whoever awards Pulitzer prizes has decided that this is the best investigative reporting of any kind done last year. Pathetic.

I repeat–where the hell is Lisa Girion‘s Pulitzer?

assetto corsa mods