Categories

Above the Fold

INDUSTRY: Who’s making money off the health care crisis?

IN an article called Who’s making money off the health care crisis? Amy Fletcher at the Denver Business Journal reminds us that “health care costs = health care incomes.”

Meanwhile I was called by a journalist from Scientific American , no less, early this morning who wanted a commentary on David Cutler’s soon to be published piece in the NEJM (apparently out this week) in which he confirms his findings that American health care is worthwhile and cost-effective if you value the life of every American — including those over 65 — at over $100,000 a year. How he squares that with an average national income per capita in the $20Ks is a mystery that you have to be a tenured Harvard economics professor to understand. Surely more on that to come. But you might want to check the letters page of the NY Times for more people calling bullshit on that shocking Gina Kolata article from last week which said that we can keep wasting money on health care because, well, we’re rich, bitch!

POLICY/POLITICS: California’s single payer bill, by Eric Novack

I don’t know why a bill that’s destined for a veto in a state he doesn’t  live in gets Eric Novack so worked up, but it does. So here’s his take on Sheila Kuehl’s single payer bill getting past the state Senate. And I won’t even mention that a Lewin study (all hail the mighty and authoratitive Lewin) showed that single payer would save California $353 billion over ten years (oops I just did!). So guess what’s Eric’s verdict is.

Many of you are aware that the California State Senate has just passed ‘universal health insurance’ for California.  The bill creates a single payer system with the details of funding to be worked out over time.  But it requires that all current Medicaid dollars and Medicare dollars (that’s all Part A and Part B) go into the pool.
 
It also creates an unbelievable bureaucracy—all unelected.  The new unelected health czar would be given control (along with an remarkably specific number of various board members—all appointed by the way) over nearly every aspect of healthcare delivery in the state.
 
The main beneficiaries – illegal immigrants, since the bill expressly states than anyone who resides in California is covered.  American citizens traveling in California—who will actually be footing the bill through federal tax revenues – would of course be billed for the cost of services provided in the state.
 
Fortunately, the Governor will likely veto this bill. For those of you who have a very strong stomach—read the bill yourself and marvel at the wishful thinking and special interest appeasement of a majority of California’s State Senate members.
But I do have to give you one gem of a quote from the KFF coverage: Chris Ohman, president and CEO of the California Association of Health Plans, said insurance companies can more effectively manage costs than the government  My Mr Ohman’s nose is getting very, very long!

POLICY: Health care and profits take a hack out of wages

The New York Times picks up on a story that’s been going on for a long time in America health care.  What’s happening is that the increase in real wages has all been sucked up by the added cost of health care benefits.  Back at at IFTF were used to have a chart which showed that real wages have gone up something around 2% from the late 70s to the mid-90s whereas health-care benefits had gone up something like 100%.The major difference now is that because the costs of health care are so much higher, the impact on wages particularly at the low end of the spectrum is much greater.  Funnily enough last week I got a notice in the mail from my health insurance company telling me that my rates would increase 20%. While I had the rep on the phone I asked when the other big rate increases would come based on my getting older.  She told me that essentially every five years, so when I turned 45, 50, 55 and 60, I would see a big bump.  My new rate is $120 a month for a $2500 deductible. If I was aged over 55, it would be something like $350, and if I was 60 and waiting for Medicare it would be nearer $500.  So even with a high deductible plan, we talking $6,000 in premiums annually for an individual policy.  When you consider that the average household income is less than $60,000, it goes to show that even at today’s rates the poorer half of the leading edge of the baby boom is going to have real trouble paying for a high deductible policy — and of course by the time you run the clock forward at the increases we’re seen, it will be even worse in five years time.

The Times story also picks up on the fact that productivity has increased but wages have not. Even when you count total compensation including health-care benefits they still haven’t kept up and more of the share of revenues is going to  profit. I cannot exactly claim to be a big fan of Tom Friedman.  After all he is the guy who justified the war in Iraq on the grounds that we were bringing democracy to the Middle East and frankly he reminds me of as a 19th century colonialist justifying the British Empire by saying that we are civilizing the native.  However, for better or for worse, he is the guy who’s popularized the notion of the earth being flat, and it is the downward pressure on wages and brought by the introduction of the Indian and Chinese labor force to the American economy that is causing the inability of American workers to grab their fair share of the increase in profitability.

But while health care benefits are keenly sought by employees, at some point they’ll realize that they don’t get the benefit of them directly, and that the ever upward spiral in health care costs is harmful to them. Of course the same issue is going on with the employers, and both sides have problems understanding what’s going on, or at least in coming to the obvious solution. Malcolm Gladwell has a New Yorker article looking a little at the history of this. It’s not particularly stellar, but it does have one great paragraph which explains why American business will fight every supplier to the last nickel but will let itself get raped year after year by health care, and not do the politically obvious thing need to stop it:

Under the circumstances, one of the great mysteries of
contemporary American politics is why Wagoner isn’t the nation’s
leading proponent of universal health care and expanded social welfare.
That’s the only way out of G.M.’s dilemma. But, from Wagoner’s
reticence on the issue, you’d think that it was still 1950, or that
Wagoner believes he’s the Prime Minister of Ireland. “One thing I’ve
learned is that corporate America has got much more class solidarity
than we do—meaning union people,” the U.S.W.’s Ron Bloom says. “They
really are afraid of getting thrown out of their country clubs, even
though their objective ought to be maximizing value for their
shareholders.”

CODA: The cynic in me sees the export of health care services to India and China as freeing up more of the total revenue available for wages and profits. I wonder which one for those will get the lion’s share

POLICY/THE INDUSTRY/QUALITY: Why health care costs so much, reason #498

Two angioplasty procedures on a 93 year old in one week.

Former President Ford underwent his second heart procedure in a week at the Mayo Clinic when stents were placed into two of his coronary arteries to increase blood flow, his spokeswoman said Friday. The angioplasty procedure on the 93-year-old Ford was successful and he was resting comfortably in his room at the hospital in Rochester, spokeswoman Penny Circle said in a statement.

Oh, and this was at Mayo, the bastion of low cost conservative medicine. So if you’re keeping score using the Dartmouth stats that means that if he’d have gone to New York University Hospital, he’d have had EIGHT procedures this week!

TECH: Dragon NaturallySpeaking first review

So I was so fed up with the common tunnel syndrome article from my last big project that I went out on board Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9. Now I am a hell of a challenge for any dictation system because as any of you have met me and spoke been no I mumble my words, and of course I have a funny British accent that doesn’t match the mutual trans-Atlantic term to Dragon NaturallySpeaking was trained in.The first two paragraphs here the first first two things I have written for the tutorial.  It’s a little disconcerting because learned you have to still speak slowly and much more clearly than you usually would and the mother trendy headset digs into my skills with it more than I would like.  In addition the words and I in a yellow box at the top of the screen and although I guess you can wait some time while you’re dictating a way for it to continue to think, it’s a little disconcerting to accumulate into it and saying nothing appearing on the screen.  In fact some 10 years ago we tried out an e-mail program that IFTF that was supposed to be the greatest new thing but when you typed on the screen nothing appeared for several seconds.  This is a little bit like that but as I continue to talk it does seem to be doing a little data, or maybe I am doing a little better for it.  Now I’m going to leave those two paragraphs, corporate and below and correct them

——

While doing this I discovered that you cannot copy and paste a huge section 🙂 I’ve spent some time fixing the next section so you can see what it should have been.So I was so fed up with the carpal tunnel syndrome from my last big project that I went out and bought Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9. Now I am a hell of a challenge for any dictation system because as any of you who have met me or spoken to me know, I mumble my words, and of course I have a funny British accent that doesn’t match the neutral trans-Atlantic tone Dragon NaturallySpeaking was trained in.The first two paragraphs here the first first two things I have written after the tutorial.  It’s a little disconcerting because you have to still speak slowly and much more clearly than you usually would and the rather trendy headset digs into my skull  with more force than I would like.  In addition the words appear in a yellow box at the top of the screen and although I guess you can wait some time while you’re dictating away for it to continue to think, it’s a little disconcerting to dissemble into it and have nothing appear on the screen.  In fact some 10 years ago we tried out an e-mail program at IFTF that was supposed to be the greatest new thing but when you typed on the screen nothing appeared for several seconds.  This is a little bit like that but as I continue to talk it does seem to be doing a little better, or maybe I am doing a little better for it.  Now I’m going to leave those two paragraphs, copy them below and correct them

——Well, it look longer to correct what I just said that to say it in the first place.  On the other hand, I guess the words that it cannot get the first time are going to be the ones it is going to continue to have trouble getting when you try to correct it.  It’s a little difficult because the manual says that you when you try to use the voice command for "select", it will actually training the software to recognize your voice and you want to try to recognize the words it has the most problem understanding.  On the other hand is a damn sight quicker to just use the mouse to select those words.Anyway it’s still a gazillion miles away from the 95% accuracy that talks about in its publicity, but it’s pretty damn clever nonetheless.  Given that the reason I bought it, was because my wrists were hosting not because I type slowly, it’s probably a good thing that I start trying to use it, at least when I’m writing lengthy pieces that require a lot of correction — and even as I keep talking now, it seems to be getting better.

The weirdest thing off all, and I suspect many of you had the same thing going on, is that I don’t consciously verbalize what I write when I’m typing.  None of your wisecracks please about the fact that I may not read what I have typed after I have typed it, although that may be true from time to time.  In some ways it’s like the old joke about the English majors in college, we used to say that if you look very closely you can see their lips moving.  While I guess I’m one of them now.

INTL/POLICY/POLITICS: American governor crosses border for healthcare

BredesenbloodIn the first public (non-academic) health care talk I ever gave to a Rotary club (in I think 1993) I was laying into the US health care system when some guy stood up and said “when he was sick the Prime Minister of Ontario came to the US for treatment.” Apparently that meant that the entire Canadian health care system was rubbish and the American one was a-ok. Given that the small business people in that room have spent the last two decades paying through the nose for their political representatives’ determination to keep the government out of health care (or something), you’d think that that meme would have less of an impact. And my Canadian friends (with help from Yankee Steve Katz) blew up that “Canadians coming south in droves” myth in their Phantoms in the Snow paper in Health Affairs a few years back.

But no matter, according to Cato et al, the Canadians are dying to become just like us. And really what’s not to love about dragging in the “market forces” which have served our system to become so cheap, consumer friendly and deliver such great outcomes for the money! (Especially if you’re a poor underpaid Canadian doctor).

So I began thinking that those of us on the other side of the spectrum need our own meme. And I think I’ve found it.

Before I tell you what it is, a little bit of background. In 1992 Ian Morrison at IFTF wrote a great piece comparing three Scandinavian health care systems. The three Scandinavian “countries” were Sweden, Denmark and Minnesota—which on all kind of ethnic and social measures, as well as in health care practice, looks far more like Scandinavia than it does the rest of the US. So in my view we can call Minnesota, in health care terms, a foreign country.

Here’s where it gets good. Tennessee has a Democratic Governor, Phil Bredesen, who is a multi-millionaire former HMO executive and the one who managed to basically throw a good chunk of his state’s population off Medicaid. So he’s representative of the prevailing wisdom about American health care. So when Phil got sick, what did he do?

He high-tailed it for Minnesota! American health care wasn’t good enough for him!

I think that’s it. American health care—not good enough for the best and brightest amongst us!

Feel free to add your own slogan

HEALTH PLANS/QUALITY: BC California on P4P

My erstwhile colleagues at FierceHealthcare have an interview up with Dr. Michael Belman, staff VP and Medical Director, Blue Cross of California. It’s a pretty good introduction, for those of you who don’t know much about it, to the P4P program in California.

On the other hand they never asked him what kind of wonderful results that Wellpoint got from dumping $40m worth of computers onto the doctors of America without any metrics or intent to actually make them integrate said computers into their workflow. (I suspect eBay got some sellers’ commissions out of it, though). Nor did they ask whether paying for performance includes paying bonuses to their underwriting staff to find ways to cancel members’ policies retroactively.

Oh well, perhaps that’ll be in the next interview!

assetto corsa mods