THCB would not exist without the  support of our generous sponsors. So we’d like to give a shout to our friends at Connextions Health. Connextions Health provides people and technology-driven business process solutions for health care insurers seeking to build or strengthen their consumer direct capabilities; helping plans to attract, acquire & retain individual and small group members. Visit Connextions Health. to learn more. Thanks guys!!! Interested in reaching a national monthly audience of 75,000 healthcare-obsessed readers? Drop us a line. We’ll get back to you with rates and options.

By Josh Seidman

There’s no doubt that people — especially those with (multiple)
chronic conditions — need a more holistic model for managing their
health needs than what our delivery system currently offers. The PCMH
model is intriguing, but I have worried that many examples of PCMH
deployment thus far have been centered around the physician’s office
(and, to some extent, the physician’s needs).

In contrast, most patients with health problems are living 24/7 with
whatever is affecting their quality of life, and not much of it is
spent in the doctor’s office. Think about it: There are 8,760 hours in
a year, and how many of them are spent in a health care facility?
Unless someone has multiple hospitalizations in a given year, the
answer is probably far less than 1 percent.

I’ve been fascinated for a long time now by the potential of Ix and
Health 2.0 strategies to deliver to us more robust models of truly
patient-centered medical homes than we have seen in most of the
country. Thankfully, other (smarter) people have also been thinking
about this and were able to join us to present in a recent webinar.

Continue reading…

By Michael Millenson

Back in December, after the Obama-Biden Transition Team encouraged individuals across the country to gather with friends and neighbors to talk about health care reform, I reported on My Health Care Reform House Party.

Turns out these Obamanians are far more serious goo-goos than I gave them credit for. Goo-goos, for you non-Chicagoans, are those earnest “good government” types with a deep and abiding belief in rationality in government. When the Obama team said it wanted the input of the masses into its health care reform plan, my brain translated that as, “What better time than the Christmas season to encourage earnest talk about the plight of the poor and uninsured.” But here we are approaching mid-February, with a President Obama playing for keeps with Congress, and the White House says it is doing both a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the feedback it received from ordinary citizens.

Continue reading…

Up and kicking at the Health Business Blog. Don’t forget that the big kahuna of all these compendiums in health and medical blogging comes to THCB next Tuesday when we host Grand Rounds. (Yes, it’s the result of a bet which we lost!) Send your finest submissions to john at thehealthcareblog dot com. Please send us a link along with a HTML-ready synopsis of your piece. Third party nominations accepted! 

Daschle out at HHS – Sharfstein in at FDA?

By MERRILL GOOZNER

The early stages of the Obama administration are beginning to
resemble the Clinton years, which I 
observed from afar (I was a foreign
correspondent in Tokyo at the time). Take Zoe Baird and substitute Tom
Daschle, who dropped out of the running for Secretary of Health and
Human Services today because of tax and conflict-of-interest problems.
Take gays in the military and substitute putting in charge of the bank
bailout a man (Tim Geithner) who knows all the bankers from his years
at the New York Fed, seems overly solicitous to their needs, and has
his own tax problems.

Once again, a new Democratic president appears to have a semi-automatic weapon semi-permanently aimed at his foot.

Continue reading entry

FDA, HHS | Permalink
|
Comments
(16)

The Case for Ron Wyden

By ROBERT LASZEWSKI

Let me be the first to suggest that the President name Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) to be the next 
Secretary of HHS. The
withdrawal by Tom Daschle has underscored just how important it will be
for the President to name someone who can bring a number of key
strengths to the job. All day reporters have been asking me whom the best person was for the
President to now turn to and get his health care agenda back on track.

Seems to me Ron Wyden fits the bill.

Continue reading “The Case for Ron Wyden”

HHS | Permalink
|
Comments
(13)

Berwick “Perfectly Designed” for HHS Secretary Post?

By Michael L. Millenson

Several well-informed sources independently told me that Institute
for Healthcare Improvement founder Dr. Donald Berwick had been chosen
by the Obama administration to run the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services — a fascinating selection. (This article,
though, reminds us of Don’s background in public health and in
government commissions that deal with a broad swath of the policy
elite.)

But would Berwick continue to agree to serve under an HHS
secretary with less prestige, Congressional clout, presidential access
and deep understanding of health care than Tom Daschle? I’m presuming
here that Berwick already had a personal relationship with Daschle and
his senior advisers. Still, Berwick has spoken in recent months of
reform from “the inside out,” and there are few “insider” positions
with more influence over health care than being in charge of the
Medicare program.

Continue reading “Berwick “Perfectly Designed” for HHS Secretary Post? “

| Permalink
|
Comments
(6)

Carmona could be logical pick for HHS job

By Val Jones MD

Merrill Goozner
has been speculating about who will be nominated as the new Secretary
of HHS. He reviewed his most likely candidates (David Cutler or David
Blumenthal), and threw in a “dark horse” potential nominee: Ken Thorpe
(whom I’ve interviewed several times on this blog and spent time with during Obama’s inauguration ceremony).

Tommy Thompson told me that the nominee is likely to be a current or former democratic governor (such as Kathleen Sebelius or Howard Dean).

But I’ve been pondering the “long shot” question and think that
Goozner may have missed a more obvious choice – someone who works with
Ken Thorpe at the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease: former Surgeon General Dr. Richard Carmona.

Continue reading “Carmona could be logical pick for HHS job”

The Perils of Play or Not Pay

By ROGER COLLIER

Remember those heady days with a newly-elected Democratic President
and solid Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress, when it
seemed that national health care reform was just around the corner?
Remember how, after the face-off between the liberals who wanted a
single-payer system and the conservatives who wanted as little change
as possible, the centrists took command? Remember the early 1990s, and
play-or-pay as the magical way to universal coverage?

So you do
remember play-or-pay? Be careful about admitting it. After the failure
of the Clinton plan and the collapse of similar state reforms in
Washington and Massachusetts, a mere mention of the term would cause
political eyes to roll, while its inclusion in any reform plan was
enough to kill the proposal dead, dead, dead.

Continue reading “The Perils of Play or Not Pay”

Economics | Permalink
|
Comments
(11)

Obama remains committed to health reform, White House official tells wonks

By Sarah Arnquist

President Obama remains committed to comprehensive health care reform
in 2009 and believes the declining economy emphasizes its urgency, a
top White House official told hundreds of health policy experts Monday
in Washington D.C.

“The current economic crisis has really highlighted the problems and put them under fluorescent lights,” said Jeanne Lambrew, deputy director of the newly created White House Office of Health Reform.

The Academy Health conference
is probably the wonkiest of meetings on the increasingly crowded health
reform conference circuit. University PhDs and private sector policy
analysts are here to discuss and assess the impacts of reform.

Continue reading “Obama remains committed to health reform, White House official tells wonks”

| Permalink
|
Comments
(18)

By John Haughton, MD

The economic stimulus bills are a great step forward for health information 
technology and medicine.

The two bills, “HR1” and “S1,” continue to barrel down the legislative track and continue being amended, but as currently written they create real incentives for adopting certified electronic health records – upwards of $40,000 per physician starting in 2011.

The legislation emphasizes rewarding designs that improve care and create a path for certification of records with added functions, such as decision support, order entry, connections to other systems and reporting on quality measures. The bill focuses on implementation by tying the physician bonuses to proven, effective use. The stimulus package also formalizes the Office of the National Coordinator for Health information Technology (ONC).

Of the nearly $900-billion stimulus package, about $20 Billion would go to Health and Human Services, with $6 billion for the Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Of that $6 billion, $2 billion would be for the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) to support information technology.

Continue reading…

By AL LEWIS

Brokers who enroll senior citizens in Medicare Advantage (MA) plan often make more on those members than the health plans themselves.  Up to $500 can be spent on a broker fee by the health plan, contributing to a total member acquisition cost which can exceed 10% of the premium dollar.  Even if Medicare Advantage plans can deliver the actual health benefit at a considerably lower cost than Medicare Fee For Service (FFS), it is possible that the entire savings could be consumed by member acquisition costs.

These costs are a tax on Medicare as a whole, a tax whose existence becomes simply unsupportable when the dire forecasts of Medicare solvency are considered.  And an unnecessary burden on health plans as we enter an era in which cutbacks are likely.

The solution is easy enough.  Where MA is available, make Fee For Service an Opt-Out rather than something which has to be “sold.”  When the benefits of both FFS and the various MA plans are laid side by side and people are told that they can simply select a plan from the chart or else complete a lot of paperwork to go FFS, more people will select the MA plans without a broker than would select those plans with an expensive broker if they are put in FFS originally and need to be “sold” to get into an MA plan.

Continue reading…

Sponsored by the Integrated Healthcare Association. Co sponsored by Bridges to Excellence, Leapfrog Group, the National Business Coalition on Health, the National Committee of Quality Assurance and the National Quality Forum. March 9 – 11, 2009 San Francisco, CA.www.PFPSummit.com