Lately, I’ve been thinking about the difference between stories and stats — those hard and fast numbers that give us “objective” information about everything from the body politic to the human body.
Social scientists like data, perhaps because it makes social science seem more “scientific.” They like to square things off and measure them. They like to count: How many? How much? What do the polls say? Percentages are impressive.
Try to tell a story, however, and a purist will remind you that “the plural of data is not anecdote.”
But what some social scientists (and some physicians) forget is that statistics measure only what can be counted. Many of the things that are most important, in medicine as in life, are immeasurable. Stories are valuable because they can capture some of the messiness of reality, including the ambiguities and contradictions that make both human experience and the human mind/body just beyond comprehension. (Since we have only the mind with which to understand the mind, ultimately investigation must end in a stand-off.)

