Double Standards, Trojan Style

The University of Southern California (USC) appears to look the other way when male physicians harass or assault women. In reality, sexual violence spares no occupation, including medicine, but the way an organization responds to crime against women indicates a certain level of integrity. The World Health Organization estimates sexual violence affects one-third of all women worldwide. In a nation where women make up 50% or more of each incoming medical school class, only sixteen percent of medical school deans are female, making gender imbalance in leadership positions nearly impossible to overcome.

For the second time in less than a year, USC President C.L. Max Nikias is grappling with sexual misconduct allegations against a physician faculty member. Complaints go back to the early 1990s from staff and patients about inappropriate comments and aggressive pelvic exams done by Dr. George Tyndall, the only full-time gynecologist for the past three decades at the campus clinic. USC ignored complaints until a nurse contacted the campus rape crisis center.

Dr. Tyndall was initially suspended pending inquiry and forced to resign shortly thereafter. More than 100 complaints have been received and five are suing USC. Astonishingly, the founded complaints against Dr. Tyndall were never turned over to authorities or reported to the Medical Board of California. USC defended this decision, asserting there was no legal obligation to report misconduct. USC has a moral and ethical duty to protect students, staff, and faculty, yet failed on both counts.

USC is no stranger to scandal. In 2007, Dr.  Carmen Puliafito, MD, a Harvard Medical School graduate, was chosen as Dean at the USC School of Medicine. His background held clues he would cause trouble. Just prior to arrival at USC, Puliafito settled a lawsuit for throwing a “tantrum” and committing assault and battery against an optometrist named Marc Brockman at the University of Miami. During the trial, Miami University disclosed they had previously investigated sexual harassment complaints against Puliafito too.

Puliafito was a strategic fundraiser, bringing in over $1 billion in donations for the Trojans; however, he kept company with criminals and documented his illicit drug use on video. His nightlife came to screeching halt when a 21-year-old female companion overdosed in a Pasadena hotel room and an ambulance transported her to the hospital. Police confiscated more than 1 gram of methamphetamine from the hotel room, but inexplicably, no police report was filed until three months later identifying Puliafito as a witness to the overdose.

An anonymous witness phoned the office of the USC President Nikias and reported Puliafito’s activities.  Ten days later, Puliafito resigned, however President Nikias never filed a complaint with the California Medical Board or the authorities. When the LA Times discovered Puliafito was still practicing as part of the USC faculty, President Nikias issued a ‘mea culpa’ admitting “they could have done better.” Unfortunately, his next choice was anything but better.

Dr. Rohit Varma succeeded Puliafito as Dean at the School of Medicine but resigned amid scandal after less than a year. He had settled a sexual harassment claim in 2003 and was disciplined by USC. Varma – then a 40-year-old junior professor – attended a conference with a young international student he was supervising. He allegedly told his student that the grant they were travelling on only supported staying in a single shared room. When the student protested, Varma took her phone and threatened to have her visa revoked. USC reached a $135,000 settlement with the woman, of which Varma paid $11,000. He was ordered to complete sexual harassment counseling and denied a promotion, yet one year later, earned full professorship, as if nothing ever happened.

Is USC defending “bad boys” with little regard for women? Or is there something else going on? One might argue that threatening your subordinate with visa revocation is borderline sociopathic. Are they being protected because they are physicians or simply because they are men?

The only way to answer this question is to look at what happens when a female physician and male physician have a hostile interaction. One evening, Dr. Meena Zareh, a cardiology resident at USC, reported being summoned to a windowless call room by Dr. Guillermo Cortes, her direct supervisor, to discuss a patient. When she attempted to leave, Dr. Cortes allegedly overpowered her, blocked the door, and assaulted her. Dr. Zareh shared the incident with a co-worker afterward but did not report it to law enforcement or the residency program for fear of reprisal until three months later. Dr. Cortes denied allegations and was placed on administrative leave pending investigation.

Dr. Cortes was allowed to return to work but was barred from unsupervised contact with Dr. Zareh. Reprisals toward Dr. Zareh began almost immediately, a signal of mounting institutional pressure to sweep her allegations under the rug. One male supervisor suggested she take a leave of absence, while others recommended deferring fellowship training or changing residency programs. Dr. Zareh is suing USC and LA County for mishandling her report of sexual assault, a mistake in which USC seems to be accumulating expertise. If the pattern holds, Dr. Cortes will get a promotion, a raise, and may become a future Dean at the Keck School of Medicine.

While double standards remain alive and well in academia, there are rays of hope. Dr. Laura Mosqueda, a geriatric physician, is one of those. She is the first woman chosen to lead the Keck School of Medicine since it was established in 1885. It is about damn time.  In the race to become a top-tier program, I have no doubt Dr. Mosqueda will achieve a great deal more than her predecessors.  After all, how could she do any worse?

Niran Al-Agba (@silverdalepeds) is a third-generation primary care physician in solo practice in an underserved area in Washington State who blogs at peds-mommydoc.blogspot.com.

Spread the love

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: , ,

6 replies »

  1. I don’t think there is any doubt that there is a double standard. How can you be in practice for a long time and not see it. A male doc has a scandalous affair with a female nurse, who gets punished? Historically, it hasn’t been the doc. Thankfully, i think this is changing, but we are not all the way there yet.

    What I think you miss is the pervasive power of money. Barry talks about it as power, but from where I sit it is all about the money. Yup, that guy may grope an occasional woman, but he brings in millions to the hospital is all too often the deciding factor, as long as you can keep it quiet.

    Just as an aside, I am still amazed at how much sh$t female nurses are willing to put up with in terms of harassment, sexual and otherwise, from male physicians. Especially if they are seen as good clinicians as they don’t want to harm their careers. Of course, they also fear they won’t be believed and fear retribution, i.e. they will be the ones who get fired. (To be clear, female doctors can also be abusive, but it is rarely sexual.)


  2. I don’t think the issue here is men vs. women at all. I think it’s a culture of protecting your own staff at all costs, especially powerful staff members. The police have their blue wall of silence. The Catholic church protected pedophile priests for decades. Colleges, with cooperation from local police, protect star football players when they get in trouble with the law. So it goes.

    • I’m quite surprised by your answer Barry. When a female doc reports an alleged assault by a male doc, it appears the male is protected far more than the female. These scenarios you describe are examples of males protecting males –pedophile priest by definition is a male– yet you do not think it is men vs. women. Well what is it then? And why would Nikias continually appoint men with a history of assaulting women? I doubt it is purposeful on his part. Either he cannot find qualified male physicians who have not assaulted women or he does not believe it is an indication of character issues. Which is it? .

      • I think it’s more about protecting the powerful than anything else and more often than not, the powerful are likely to be men. At my alma mater, University of Pennsylvania, though, the current president is a woman and the president before her was a woman. That’s a 24 year span of female presidents so far. Female university presidents are relatively common throughout the Ivy League schools in recent years.

  3. The Dean of the Boalt Law School at UC Berkeley had to be cashiered for the same reasons a couple of years ago… Can you believe it? That is the most prestigious law school in the UC system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *