Physicians

The Shame of Malpractice Lawsuits

This posting is not about tort reform. It is not about defensive medicine (e.g., MDs taking too many tests to avoid the chance of lawsuit.) It is not about controlling costs or improving the quality of care. It is not even about whether malpractice lawsuits are fair. It is about the emotional effect on a doctor when he or she is sued for malpractice.

A friend of mine (I’ll alternate genders to help maintain confidentiality) recently found herself in this situation. By any measure, this person is an excellent physician. She has impeccable clinical judgment when it comes to both diagnosis and treatment. She has superb interpersonal skills and bedside manner. She is highly respected by her peers, by the nurses, and by all who know her.

Recently he found himself as a defendant in a malpractice lawsuit. The details and merits of the case don’t matter all that much. The patient had been under his care for many, many years and was always satisfied with the quality of care offered. After the patient died, the patient’s children sued.

Even though she knew that she had done nothing wrong, my friend’s main emotional response to the lawsuit was that she was ashamed. She did not want anyone to know about the case — whether colleagues in the hospital or social friends. I was stunned. Without knowing any of the evidence in the case, I was confident that this doctor had done her best in treating another human being and would be appalled to think she had done anything to create harm. I also knew this person to be as well trained and well intentioned as anyone I could imagine.

And, yet, he felt shame in being named as a defendant in a case that accused him of negligent treatment. As I talked to other doctors, I learned that this was a common reaction to such lawsuits. Another friend talked of the scars left from a case 20 years ago. He was found not to be at fault, but he could still vividly recall the weeks of shame he felt while the case proceeded.

What is it that makes doctors respond in this way? Are they so naive about the legal system that they are not able to absorb its brickbats with equanimity? After all, people in other fields are sued all the time, and while they feel many emotions, usually shame is not at the top of the list.

I think it is this. Doctors devote their lives to alleviating human suffering caused by disease. They spend decades in training. They disrupt their family lives to be available to help others. For them, this is a calling. It is not part of their life. It is their life. They measure their worth to their community and ultimately value themselves by their unfettered dedication to this cause — and by society’s appreciation for it.

A malpractice claims shatters this construct. In the doctor’s mind and heart, it says, “Society does not value all that I have devoted my life to. They do not believe I am worthy of trust that is granted to me, notwithstanding the effort, energy, and dedication I have given to this calling.” And perhaps he even says, “Maybe I am not really as good a doctor or as good a person as I think I am.”

For someone who has spent his or her whole life basking in the gratitude and admiration of individuals and society, this can be a devastating experience. Even when the verdict is issued, clearing the doctor of all wrong, it can leave a terrible scar.

As this particular case proceeded, I was really pleased to see an evolution in the doctor’s feelings. After watching the opposing witnesses misrepresent the clinical evidence in the case, she got really, really angry. Her sense of shame evaporated. It was replaced by an outrage that the patient’s children, the plaintiff’s lawyer, and members of her own profession were causing her to spend hours away from the care of other needy patients. With the arrival of anger, her confidence returned.

Sure enough, he was cleared of all allegations. He came back to work, and I was heartened to see that caring smile return to the floors of our hospital. I hope he never has occasion to feel unwarranted shame ever again.

Paul Levy is the President and CEO of Beth Israel Deconess Medical Center in Boston. Paul recently became the focus of much media attention when he decided to publish infection rates at his hospital, despite the fact that under Massachusetts law he is not yet required to do so. For the past three years he has blogged about his experiences in an online journal, Running a Hospital, one of the few blogs we know of maintained by a senior hospital executive.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Physicians

Tagged as:

13
Leave a Reply

13 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
JuliejackDan UrbachSteven Zeitzew, M.D.Peter Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Julie
Guest
Julie

The writer presents all doctors as called for the benefit of mankind and all put their patients welfare above colleagues and their own self interests. I wish this were true. There are many doctors that will not fully disclose errors and leave patients in the dark only to protect themselves from lawsuits. This is why most malpractice suits are filed, because patients become frustrated with not being able to get straight answers. Then all doctors circle the wagons and patients can never get candid information about their health issues. So, ask yourself, all of you top notch, caring doctors, “How… Read more »

jack
Guest
jack

so when you get sued, and when we ask for justice, the system tries to keep you from justice, but for, so what, and as the law of tort has and will change to criminal charges and so on, hey, someone dies and get a rash and almost dies becasue some medical profesional used you as an experiment and all you needed was an occupational therapist, well, money, money, money,
Jack Dairkill

jack
Guest
jack

Medical Mal practice
let me begin, when doctors, thrive on trafficing in persons, and whenthey themselves prescribe excesive amounts of drugs, when they even intentionally kill, when they just want to keep you quiet and feed you poor quality services;
of course we know just what we are doing, money, money, money…..Johnny

Dan Urbach
Guest
Dan Urbach

Really interesting discussion. I have reviewed about 120 malpractice cases, for both plaintiff and defense. In my experience, I agree with the defense two times out of three, and I agree with the plaintiff one time out of three. By far the majority of my work is in clinical practice (not expert witness work), and in giving opinions to lawyers I always use evidence based guidelines and/or appropriate literature, and I’ll give them both sides of the evidence story. The good lawyers like this approach. The bad ones get rid of me, and I’m happy not to hear from them… Read more »

Steven Zeitzew, M.D.
Guest

Gary wrote: “Lawsuites are seldom enacted unless some form of strong proof has been revealed.Lawyers are like used Car salesman who only sue on a sure thing.” Perhaps it is this common belief that anyone accused is likely guilty that leads to a reluctance to discuss these accusations. I question Gary’s assumption. For example, in 1986 a Philadelphia jury awarded a woman more than $900,000 in damages because she claimed her psychic powers had been damaged during a CAT scan at Temple University Medical School (New York Times, March 29, 1986). – Skeptical Inquirer Nov/Dec 1996. Personally I think much… Read more »

Peter
Guest
Peter

“It is about the emotional effect on a doctor when he or she is sued for malpractice.”
And about the emotional effects on injured patients, not to mention the financial ones.
“The details and merits of the case don’t matter all that much.”
Oh, but they do.
“After all, people in other fields are sued all the time”
By doctors?
“Sure enough, he was cleared of all allegations”
Then the system worked, didn’t it.

Gary Lampman
Guest
Gary Lampman

Interesting article and human perspective. I have to ask that within the enviromental and cultural peer review. Is it possible that within this bubble; You have created a false sense of Security and a buffer from real world realities? Those of us who work in the private sector deal with being rejected, questioning our motivations and being sued. We also make our mission to serve:putting ourselves last. To provide for our customers as well. Anyone who has any pride in their Profession of choice share the Same Feelings. Therefore I see no real differences in Health Care. Lawsuites are seldom… Read more »

A. Nony Mouse
Guest
A. Nony Mouse

Thank you for writing this. I too have seen physicians sued who were, by all measures, top notch. The experience for them of being dragged through years of depositions and legal wrangling was devasting. They never knew whether all they had worked for would be wiped out by a single jury verdict who felt sorry for someone who happened to have a bad outcome regardless of the quality of the care that was delivered. It’s not simply one’s reputation that is at stake but personal financial assets if the jury award is greater than one’s malpractice coverage. Watching others experience… Read more »

Dr. David E. Marcinko MBA
Guest

A bad outcome is not necessarily medical malpractice as we have all opined many times before, and in the book: “Risk Management and Insurance Planning for Physicians and their Advisors.”
http://www.amazon.com/Insurance-Management-Strategies-Physicians-Advisors/dp/0763733423/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1275315795&sr=1-3
Courage!
Dr. David Edward Marcinko, MBA
http://www.MedicalExecutivePost.com
Atlanta, GA

Gary Levin
Guest

In medicine we physicians are taught that the patient and family’s welfare is a priority even before the physicians’ own welfare. We have been abused badly by our system. In many many cases a bad outcome is inevitable. Good Health is a gift and it cannot be assigned to the physician. We merely stand in the way of inevitability and in some cases succeed. We physicians cannot guarantee health. I don’t know the specifics of this case, nor what the merits were. I hope you have your physician back for good. Nice to know he (she) had such great support… Read more »

DeterminedMD
Guest
DeterminedMD

Thank you for writing this. Sums it up perfectly to me. I have yet to be sued, thanks to whatever fates have supported me thus far in life, but this is what I have heard equally from colleagues who were wrongfully sued.
We do this as a calling. I just hope someone who doesn’t get this tries to write something shameless and rude.
You never know when that adage comes back at you: what goes around comes around!

PharmerJoshua
Guest
PharmerJoshua

If government licensing was removed along with its false sense of secruity and people put more effort into their own healthcare decision making, lawsuits would not occur as much. People should be able to sue and have no caps on damages, but government licensing and price insensitivity on behalf of the consumer have created a monster of a healthcare system in this country.
What really gets me is when stupid judges actually CRIMINALIZE negligence or errors resulting from process issues, not the individual. This only encourages hospitals and practitioners to hide errors even more than they already do.

Ross Franklin
Guest

As a physician I don’t see the problem with what the fire department did. There is only so much free care and then you have to pay.