Uncategorized

Health care reform : What we can learn from Costco

CostcoThe most telling point about health reform in President Obama's budget is that, "Some researchers 
believe that healthcare costs could be reduced by a stunning 30 percent — or about $700 billion a year — without harming quality if we moved as a nation toward the proven and successful practices adopted by the lower-cost areas and hospitals."

That sentence gives us some grist for forecasting some of the elements of health reform — in particular, the last phrase which talks about moving from higher-cost, unproven health practices to lower-cost proven approaches.

In a post earlier this week, I talked about the importance of understanding practice variations, especially those behaviors that lead to increasing costs without improving health outcomes. Under the New England Journal of Medicine paper's scenario, all practitioners would be incentivized to behave as if they practiced in Salem, Oregon and not Miami, Florida.

What will it take to "move" medical practices? We can take a page out of Costco's playbook to answer this one. Three Costco tactics which keep the business resilient will be relevant to this scenario: standardization, deployment of information technology, and tough negotiations with suppliers.

Standardization. Costco long-term success and profitability has been driven on setting consistently high standards. Whether you enter a warehouse in southern California or in the Mid-Atlantic states, the Costco consumer experience is singular. Variability is not a good thing in the Costco playbook. In December 2008, the Dartmouth Atlas team offered an Agenda for Change which laid out some practical tactics for reducing practice variation to lead to more standardized care patterns and rational spending. Written by John Wennberg (the godfather of medical practice variation research) and Shannon Brownlee (author of the seminal book Overtreated) and colleagues, the Agenda includes financial incentives for Medicare providers that would share savings resulting from better organizing patient care and improving outcomes and efficiencies especially for people managing chronic conditions. Efficiency here means the best outcomes and quality for patients at the lowest cost and resource utilization.

Information technology deployment. Costco's success has been built on a strong IT backbone for both back office and front-of-store functions. Information which quantifies what therapies, procedures and workflows work versus which do not is the underpinning for this approach. Thus, the deployment of information systems among provider organizations becomes a strategic imperative. Indeed, the Obama Administration has anticipated this through the inclusion of HIT adoption incentives beginning with the Medicare and Medicaid programs in 2011.

Tough negotiations with suppliers. Costco never accepts a price increase from a supplier without examining every alternative possible to hold the line on price. At Costco, nothing is ever marked up 14% above costs. In the health care setting, this approach will rely on comparative effectiveness studies which analyze existing therapeutic interventions and compare new competitors in the market, whether they be drugs, biologics, surgical techniques, devices, or other medical inputs. If the new-new input is shown to be more beneficial for outcomes and overall savings to the system, then it will be adopted into the system. If not, the existing treatment will prevail.

Jane's Hot Points: While Costco's fortunes may be down in the current economy, they are an important case study for how to provide value-for-money in a consumer-facing milieu. The vision of the Obama health budget is that the U.S. sickness system will morph from a sickness system to a citizen-centric wellness system. The tenets of standardization, appropriately-scaled and deployed information technology, and tough negotiations on price for supplies and services will be helpful building blocks to move the dysfunctional environment toward a healthier delivery system that covers all citizens.

Vendors to the health care industry, be forewarned. Interestingly, the medical device industry has come out to support comparative effectiveness research, so long as it doesn't, "put an arbitrary dollar amount on an extra year of life or force patients toward a single treatment based on cost," in the words of AdvaMed, the industry lobby group.

By the way, the health segment is a big focus at Costco. Furthermore, Costco provides health insurance to employees, something Wall Street hasn't liked very much over the years.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as:

11
Leave a Reply

11 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
Lori Thompsonlambert stretherJeffCorey ShankErnest Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Lori Thompson
Guest
Lori Thompson

I am not saying that I fully understand the healthcare reform bill, but what I do know is that forcing a person to purchase something that you possess control over is wrong. The government can control much of the insurance business and now is mandating the American people to buy into a broken system. Spending more money to fix the problem isn’t a solution. Actuall fixing the problem would be nice. Give us lower premiums, actual coverage that will cover things, and a chance to get sick and have peace of mind to know that things are going to be… Read more »

lambert strether
Guest

As long as private insurance companies are in the game, all that IT will do is enable them to deny people care more efficiently. Technocracy is not the answer here! The Obama administration should not be experimenting with people’s lives as it structures with health care reform. Rather, it should look to proven models of success — prominent among them single payer. Because single payer’s philosophy of “everybody in, nobody out” minimizes administrative costs — 3% vs 30% for the insurance companies — it can save $350 billion. And if the Dartmouth study’s experimental approach proves out, and we save… Read more »

Jeff
Guest
Jeff

Costco Pharmacy is available to all, Members and Non members alike!

Corey Shank
Guest

I did just post a comment on my blog about healthcare I.T. What I’ve known is that the super-expensive systems are not flexible, not interoperable and are closed. It seems they are designed to require expensive maintenance and deliverable contracts, and to depricate shortly after installation.
I.T. in just about every other business sector has to be be efficient, flexible, user-friendly and compatible.
Lastly, remember Costco is a members-only system, it is not accessible by the population at large.

Ernest
Guest
Ernest

REALITY V THEORY
How can we get reality to fit into this theory?

Richard L. Reece, MD, medinnovationblog.blogspot.com
Guest

It’s been 36 years since Wennberg wrote his classic paper on small area variation. Hundreds of peer-reviewed papers based on the Dartmouth Atlas Project have followed. These papers focus on Medicare patients and differences in care and costs in high and high cost environments and low growth and low cost environments and often mention overspecialization, over-use of resources in doctor-rich cities, doctor generated-demand, and practitioners striving to meet “target-incomes.” Dasrtmouth studies conclude intensive use of resources does not produce better care, and indeed the opposite is usually true. The differences, saith Dartmouth. , are due to discretionary decisions by physicians… Read more »

Dr. Rick Lippin
Guest

HIT is just a tool- and an immature one at that.If not properly designed and implemented according to variable hospital and medical practice cultures,like any tool, it can range from being effective,to being useless,to causing harm.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

jim jaffe
Guest
jim jaffe

As a fan of costco and walmart both, I think it takes an overwhelming amount of faith to speak of American health system and standardization within the same sentence — or even paragraph. Wennberg’s been documenting practice disparities for better than a quarter century with no appreciable result — tho he may be nudging new docs into the high cost areas. As that great health philosopher Ronald Reagan said, “its simple, but it isn’t easy.”

Rob
Guest
Rob

IT won’t save healthcare any more than it’s saved banking, or credit-card defaults, or anything else that’s craving the automation of a bad idea. Cutting costs in an dysfunctional system will result in a really bad, dangerous dysfunctional system with no reporting so no one knows how broken it is. This is what automation brings to us – an impoverished outlook. No, we must return to basic principals, and that includes expectations on the part of stakeholders, such as physicians, boards of directors, nurses, fiscal departments, quality and compliance departments, physical plant departments and so on. In other words, people… Read more »

Ernest
Guest
Ernest

WTF?
Trying to compare Costco to U.S. healthcare is like comparing Edward R. Murrow to Michael “schlock-umentary” Moore. Hard to imagine two, more different scenarios.
And ditto to Ravi: people who think I.T. will save health care have never installed a major I.T. system at an affordable price. You’d have better luck with your money at Bernie Madoff’s firm than with most I.T. providers.

Healthcare Guru
Guest

Jane, That is Walmart not Costco. I do take exception that somehow people believe that IT isthe solution. IT is just going to enable…The impact of information technlogy will be very small unless we look into the basic design of our healthcare system. To make a point, one of the hospital told me few months back that they did implement a system with multimillion dollar budget and in the end….nothing came out and they were very pained with expenditure and not benefit… Different people will find different reason for the above outcome…but the end result is what it is. The… Read more »