After monitoring e-patients.net and The Health Care Blog, I have to ask: Do doctors read? And if so, what?
I know four things from my own experience (and watching “Grey’s Anatomy”).
First, physicians are busy often exhausted individuals who deal with life-and-death matters. For some, a robust sense of importance, if not their institutional setting, makes them deaf to patient input. The work-to-the-max ethic and lifestyle is inculcated since before medical school.
Second, physicians in my daughter’s chain of medical events were highly resistant if not resentful of patient input regarding new sources of information, from medical to newspaper to Internet articles. Regardless of how tactfully the material was presented.
Third, as is clear from my own posts, the ones I encountered don’t read The New York Times.
Fourth, the doctors I know, when they do have leisure time, spend it at the health club, on the ski slopes, at the theater or flying jets. They don’t read for leisure and thus are unlikely to familiarize themselves with the irony, say, of Robert B. Parker’s Spenser novels. Irony is useful here in that it, and the humor in Spenser, arises from the skepticism of a Single Joe dealing with large, but not efficient, corporate and government entities.
So I raise the question: Do doctors read? And if so, what?
Whatever they are reading, or not reading, seems to contribute to the ossification of attitude implicit in David Kibbe’s recent post on The Health Care Blog about his quest to urge physicians to adopt up-to-date Information Technology. Of all the entities involved in transformation of the health care system, the physician community seems least able to adapt to changing times.
Christine Gray is a patient who blogs at e-patients.net, where this post first appeared.