What is the one thing no human being should want to be next week?
A Republican Senator at a Fourth of July Picnic.
In the most amazing turn of events I have seen in 20 years of following health care policy in Washington, the Democrats have the Republicans backed into an awful corner over the issue of the July 1st automatic 10.6% Medicare physician fee cut and corresponding private Medicare cuts to pay for nixing it. Also at stake is another 5% physician fee cut set for January 1, 2009.
On Tuesday, when the House voted 355-59 in favor of the Senate
Democratic bill to stop the physician fee cut, suspend the durable
medical equipment competitive bidding system, and pay for the doc cut
by ending the private fee-for-service version of Medicare Advantage in
2011, no one was more surprised then the Senate Democrats themselves.
On seeing that vote, Senate Democrats scrapped the bipartisan
compromise that Baucus and Grassley worked out to avoid the cuts,
freeze 2009 physician payments, and bypass the Medicare Advantage
changes to pay for it. Democrats and Republicans were ready to be happy
with that and go home for the week-long holiday recess.
But then Senate Democrats saw a huge election-year opportunity to stick the Republicans out on a limb and start sawing it off.
Senate Majority Leader Reid and the Senate Democrats decided to
shelve the Baucus/Grassley compromise and bring the just passed House
bill back for another Senate vote (the first attempt to get the 60
votes necessary for cloture failed garnering only 54 Senators).
Late Thursday night, they did just that and missed getting the
necessary 60 votes by just one Senator. It is notable that Senator
Kennedy was not present and could have been the 60th vote. It was a
very undignified scene on the Senate floor as Republicans felt betrayed
thinking they had an amicable deal to get past the cuts and go home.
It is also important to remember that Senate Democratic Leader Reid
came in for lots of criticism by House Democrats late last year when he
chose not to take on the Republicans and a threatened Bush veto and
settled on a modest SCHIP compromise. Many in the House thought Senate
Democrats should have been tougher. This may be Reid’s chance to show
the House how tough he can be — especially since the House handed him
such a lopsided veto-proof margin on this vote.
So, the Senate recessed on Friday with the docs facing a 10.6% fee cut in just four days.
The Democratic plan is, with the docs looking down the barrel of a
10.6% fee cut on Tuesday, to let the Senate Republicans stew in a
provider lobbying onslaught of unprecedented proportions during the
How effective is the doctor lobby? 355-59, that’s how effective.
About every other health care provider is onside with the docs as well
— durable medical equipment because of their bailout in the House
bill, and every other provider because they’d like to see the precedent
established that it is the HMO industry that has the money to give back
to Medicare–not them. AARP is also backing the docs, giving members
political cover with seniors to vote against the private Medicare plans.
I am continually asked: Would Congress really cut private Medicare
with almost 10 million seniors in it? 355-59 — any other questions?
Bush also reaffirmed his veto threat for any bill that cuts private
Medicare. HHS, trying to get some heat off Republicans and save CMS
from a real payment mess, deferred the physician cuts for 10 days.
What’s going to happen when the Congress returns on July 7th?
There will quickly be another Senate vote on the House bill.
If it passes, it goes to Bush who, as long as the vote isn’t
enormously lopsided, will veto it. In that case the docs will need to
have scared enough Republicans to get a veto-proof 67 votes or the docs
are out 10.6%.
For two years I have been telling you that the Dems were going to
get private Medicare. In November 2006, I thought the big showdown
would come during the 2007 budget deliberations. More recently, I
figured the Democrats would just bide their time until they had a
stronger hand — after the coming elections.
Turns out I was six months off the first time.
Will the doctors suffer the 10.6% cut if the next Senate vote fails
to move the bill? Could well be. Sure, the Baucus/Grassley compromise
is laying there but I can’t see the Democrats backing down now. The
train has left the station on the Democratic argument that it is the
Republicans who are blocking a physician fee fix and I think they will
continue down that track.
If you are a doctor, I would go find your Republican Senator at the nearest Fourth of July picnic and get at it.
If 7 or 8 Republican Senators don’t come back to Washington on July
7th with a changed mind, you are out 10.6% on July 1st and another 5%
on January 1, 2009.
We will have extraordinary political theater the week of July 7.
Why both making bipartisan health policy when you can stage Jerry Springer-like confrontations for the Bubba political spectators who only read the headlines.
Here again, the Democrats go for the cheap thrills and the sleazy tabloid political event.
Other commentators are right: this was about cornering Medicare Advantage one last time, knowing that it will absolutely be cut next year, and casting the Dems as white hats defending their family physician against those greedy HMO’s. Dems get C- on politics (bailing out DME ripoffs) and an F on making policy. Catron got it right.
So now you’ve got a ton of great campaign ads against Republican house members (they voted against health insurance for kids (whose parents make $80 thousand a year) and against your family doc (and the surgeons and imaging joint ventures who ran up the Part B tab). Our political process has reached a zenith of cynicism on health policy. Wait ’till they try “reforming” the health system.
This whole circus is about killing Medicare Advantage.
The Democrats have attached the MA issue to the physician pay issue in a transparent attempt to co-opt the more gullible docs in their ongoing effort to kill market-based Medicare reform.
Last year, they attacked MA using SCHIP funding as a pretext. At that time, they told the public we had to choose between ”the kids” and the insurance companies.
It’s a giant scam.
Bush has repeatedly promised to veto the bill because it takes funding away from his cherished give-away to insurance companies (Medicare Advantage) in order to fund the physician reimbursement fix.
George Bush by executive order put a hold on the medicare cutbacks. Why would you think he would veto the bill?
Who in their right mind would orchestrate a bill that cuts payments for doctors and health and human services? It could only be those Republicans who think themselves so separate from regular folks that communicable diseases do not affect them or their kinfolk. Limiting treatment ensures that whatever is bad will get worse. Coughing can be TB, as an example. Unlike prince prospero who hid in his castle from the red death, these senators and congresspersons have to take elevators, visit their constituents and shake their hands. I hear there is a pandemic on the horizon, or is what I am hearing just the ticking of an ebony clock.