Criminal charges filed against transplant surgeon

Prosecutors in a small town on California’s Central Coast are making history. For the first time in the United States, they brought criminal charges against a transplant surgeon, alleging he prescribed excessive amounts of medication in an attempt to hasten a disabled man’s death and harvest his organs. The case cleared its final pretrial hurdle Wednesday and will now go before a jury later this year.

San Francisco surgeon Hootan Roozrokh faces one felony charge of dependent adult abuse, for which the maximum punishment is four years in prison. Roozrokh, 34, has pleaded not guilty and his attorney, M. Gerald Schwartzbach said his client looks forward to clearing his name at trial.

The Roozrokh case has attracted much national attentionand raises worrisome questions about whether the transplant community is pressing too hard to increase the nation’s organ supply, thereby creating situations ripe for blurring ethical boundaries, such as this one.

It also exemplifies many people’s worst fears about organ donation: That a surgeon will consider comatose patients solely a source for organs and accelerate their death to save other lives.p>

Many fear this case will have a chilling effect on transplant surgeons, hospitals and patients regarding organ donation. When nearly 100,000 peopleare waiting for organs, this is awful publicity for the transplant community.

“The idea of extending elder or dependent adult abuse charges to medical care is a sensitive one,” said Dr. Brian Liang, a law professor at San Diego’s California Western Law School. “You don’t want a chilling effect on physicians doing the right thing.”

The details

Here’s what witnesses said happened on Feb. 3 and 4, 2006 in operating room No. 3 at a community hospital in San Luis Obispo, Calif., after 25-year-old Ruben Navarro’s mother agreed to donate his organs. (Rosa Navarro has also filed a wrongful death suit against all the parties involved.)

The California Transplant Donor Network the Organ Procurement Organization responsible for coordinating donations in Northern California – dispatched a team from San Francisco to travel four hours south to San Luis Obispo and recover Navarro’s organs.

Roozrokh, and fellow Kaiser Permanente surgeon Arturo Martinez were part of the team. Roozrokh, who was born in Iran but grew up in Wisconsin, was less than a year out of his transplant surgery fellowship at Stanford University Medical Center. He has not spoken to the press.

Navarro, who suffered from a debilitating neurological condition since childhood, had been comatose in the hospital for four days. His doctors determined he had suffered irreversible brain damage, but still had minimal brain function and so was not legally brain dead. That’s key to this case because it meant Navarro was a candidate for donation after cardiac death.

Donation after cardiac death

About 95 percent of organ donations from dead donors in the United States come from brain dead patients. There is no time rush in these cases. The donor can be dead for days or even weeks before the donation takes place, allowing the family plenty of time to say goodbye and prepare for donation.

The other 5 percent are donations from donors, who like Navarro are not brain dead but are being maintained on ventilators and die only after being removed from the ventilator and their hearts stop beating. This is called donation after cardiac death.(This type of donation is rare today, but it was the only type of donation available until a legal definition of brain death was created in the early 1980s.)

In cardiac-death donations, time is of the essence. When these donors are removed from life support, their primary doctor will declare death and then wait for five minutes to be sure the patient doesn’t spontaneously wake up. The removal of life support may be done in the operating room, but the transplant team is not allowed near the patient until after death is declared.

Now, timing becomes important. The patient must die within an hour of being removed from the ventilator or the organs do not retain enough oxygen to be viable for transplantation.

After Navarro was removed from the ventilator, he continued breathing on his own. Prosecutors allege that Roozrokh tried to accelerate Navarro’s death by ordering 130 milligrams of morphine and 60 milligrams of Ativan in less than an hour. The ICU nurse said she gave more medication at the direction of the transplant nurse.

Donation after cardiac death is ethically and legally acceptable only if strict guidelines are followed. Roozrokh violated those protocols when allegedly he assumed care for Navarro before his attending physician had declared his death. It’s undisputed that Roozrokh prescribed medications for Navarro, although witnesses disagree on the amounts.

Alan Weisbard, a University of Wisconsin professor of law and bioethics, is among the experts who have voiced concerns that the zealousness to procure organs may cause physicians and procurement teams to overstep boundaries intended to protect patients.

Donation after cardiac death leaves a very narrow margin of error in this domain, and it is rather clear in this case that relevant lines were crossed,” Weisbard said.

Navarro didn’t die until eight hours after being removed from the ventilator. His organs were never used, and the coroner determined he died of natural causes. (He was cremated and an autopsy was never performed).

Several doctors have expressed amazement that Navarro, who weighed about 80 pounds, did not die shortly after given the alleged medication doses. That’s the key to Roozrokh’s defense. His lawyer claims Navarro had a high tolerance to pain medication, and Roozrokh’s actions prevented Navarro from experiencing and pain or discomfort on his “pathway to death.”

“Nothing this man did. Nothing this man said adversely affected the quality of Mr. Navarro’s life,” Schwartzbach said in court, gesturing to Roozrokh.

Blurring ethical lines?

No transplant surgeon in the world has ever been in similar circumstances, Roozrokh’s lawyer said while arguing for the case to be dismissed.

The hospital had no cardiac-death donation protocol, and none of the hospital staff involved had ever been trained in the procedure. Navarro’s attending physician didn’t understand why she had to be there, and  Martinez, a veteran surgeon, did not intervene when Roozrokh ordered medications. Roozrokh and the transplant nurse had each only seen the procedure done once.

Also, no national standard for donation after cardiac death existed at that time. The United Network for Organ Sharing, the nonprofit that contracts with the federal government and overseas regional organ procument organizations, adopted national standard a year after this incident occurred.

Knowing all this, the Transplant Network sent an inexperienced team to recover Navarro’s organs. The surgeons do not have a financial incentive to recover organs. They get paid either way. The Transplant Network, however, is rated by its procurement rate.

Most doctors agree that Roozrokh violated the organ donation protocol when he wrote a prescription for Navarro. Surgeons should not, and in some states, legally cannot care for a patient whose organs they will procure. Whether that professional breach constitutes a criminal act will be up to a jury, which may have a difficult time pointing the finger at Roozrokh because undisputedly the entire system failed that night.

PHOTO CREDIT San Luis Obispo Tribune

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: ,

10 replies »

  1. No worries then again much more write-up offer you unique guidelines to
    help you learn how to start found in seeking the ideal auto-grade repair shop Body that you choose to and your
    automobile might be happy with. These savings can then be passed on to customers, meaning lower
    prices and a job well done. Use extra care when passing in bad weather, at night, or under any other unfavorable
    conditions, because it is difficult to judge speed and distance.

  2. WATER INJECTION: EXPENSIVE TO BUY – HARD TO INSTALL. Audi R8 has a stealthy design and you can see people clicking picture of your car.
    We operate dealerships in Parramatta, Blacktown, Alexandria, East Sydney and

  3. It’s also good to know why the person is selling the vehicle.
    If the roof leaks, you’ve just improved your ability to negotiate a reduced price.
    If speed is on your mind, there are some great fast cars that you will find
    with a low price tag if you dig a little deeper for information.

  4. What i don’t realize is in reality how you are now not really a lot more smartly-liked than you may be now.
    You are so intelligent. You realize thus significantly relating to this topic, produced me personally believe it from a lot of varied angles.
    Its like women and men don’t seem to be involved except
    it’s one thing to do with Woman gaga! Your personal
    stuffs great. At all times maintain it up!

    My weblog … C. H. Best dui defence force attorney

  5. Very interesting situation. An incident occurred in 1992 involving a cult involving the hastening of another individuals death. To this day this incident goes unknown and uninvestigated. Click on the following link and ask, “what is the difference?” How can a crime this gross go unheard?

  6. I believe that people today are finding any excuse to make quick fast money. The family member of Dr.Roozrokh’s patient and trying to gain reparations for their loss. In all honesty, doctors do not go into their field because they have the sadistic intentions. Their intentions are to help their patient by any means necessary. The Navarro family needs to understand that this was a risky surgery from the jump and to place the results in the hand of the doctor is like taking a Person with HIV/AIDS and having them undergo a blood transfusion than saying that the doctor gave that person HIV/AIDS. Would you find it reasonable to place the doctor in an unnecessary trial? I think not. Doctors have a lot pressure placed on them and I dont feel as though that is an excuse for the few cases that have gone awry but people going throug highly cautious procedures should have some sort of understand of the risks that they are placing on themselves and their loved ones.

  7. This has been a very sad case just a few miles from my practice. There were no winners.
    Personally, I don’t think there is a jury that would convict this physician of criminal charges. Fortunately for him, the judge has dropped 2 of the 3 charges. Although, when you look at his behavior (and the lack of behavior of everyone else in the O.R. who were somehow able to get immunity in the case)it is easy to see how he could have prevented all of this.
    I’m sure the Medical Board of CA will also have their say in this before it is all over.