POLICY: Has the dog’s sore not completely healed?

The NY Times has been getting much better in its reporting on health care policy. After all David Leonhardt had Shannon Brownlee’s book as economics book of the  year! And they’ve been getting Jack Wennberg in frequently.

But every now and again something crops up that worries me about it’s desire to go straight adn reminds me of that dog with the licking problem. Today it’s the idea that concerns about health care costs are global, which I guess is true, and that the rest of the world–where employers often don’t pay for health care–is becoming more like the  US where employers do. The short piece is called Going Global With Concerns on Health Costs and the casual reader might think that systems are converging around the idea that employers should pay for health care because governments can’t afford to.

Leaving aside the basic point that the route by which money is raised to pay for health care is not very relevant compared to how it’s spent and the system by which people get coverage, the article makes two tiny confusions.

First, as it says, it’s supplemental health care costs that employers are paying for in most countries–and in many countries like the UK they’ve done that for decades. Here employers pay for everything. that’s a massive difference.

Second, the increase in percentage paid by employers is only big enough to grow really fast in 4 countries. Those are India, China, Venezuela and Russia. Not exactly health care systems that compare to the US. Our health care system is bigger than those economies!

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: ,

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
dog containment systemTom Leith Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
dog containment system

Nice post! I will be saving this page to my favorites for sure. -Andreidog containment system That’s interesting…I didn’t know that!

Tom Leith
Tom Leith

> Here employers pay for everything. > that’s a massive difference. For now. Seems to me a Big Story&tm; is the success Detroit have had in turning over responsibility for retiree healthcare benefits to the UAW. I think what it means in practical terms is something like this: if healthcare spending growth exceeds the growth of the economy generaly, the UAW will have to cut benefits to retirees. They don’t want to do that, so there will be pressure for utilization containment and cost containment coming from “workers” not from “corporations”. I cannot imagine it will stop with retirees. If… Read more »