Uncategorized

POLITICS: President Obama’s Health care head fake

So unlike Paul Krugman who’s just being critical of Obama’s lack of a mandate, over at Spot-on I think I see the political brilliance behind it–or am I just deluding myself? Come back here to comment of course:

It’s a perplexing time to be a liberal. A Martian arriving on earth,
having seen the Republicans pandering hard to their base in the
primaries would assume the Democratic base would be rallying behind the
candidate who held the correct positions in 2004, and be apologizing
for ignoring him last time.

SNIP

Getting to voluntary universal coverage by trying to lower encourage
lower costs and hoping everyone will join in will not work, and even
Obama’s main health care adviser admits it.
But this irrationality has got me thinking. Why is Obama trying to promote something he knows won’t work?

Read the rest at Spot-On

Meanwhile, there’s an almost companion piece also at Spot-on from Deborah Klosky. Interestingly, both pieces focus on misinterpretations of how our society
actually functions – Deb notes that assuming women will care for the old and
sick is as out-dated as assuming they’re able to stay home and care for their
children. Some are but many – most are not. She writes:

It’s the same problem as with caring for a child; our current
system relies on a mythical, anachronistic view – there’s a big happy family
living all together, with mom in the kitchen running the home front all
day.

Kind of like Obama – a little wishful thinking might go a long way. Read Deb’s piece also at Spot-on

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: ,

6
Leave a Reply

6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
tcoyoteNeimonBillPeter Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Peter
Guest
Peter

Actually Neiman I think I was making a greater comment on Baby Boomer parenting skills than I was GenX attitudes. As for the Boomer elder care issue I was indirectly trying to say that what they reap (their kids attitiudes) they might inherit, kinda like Harry Chapin’s “Cat’s Cradle”. Anyway, gota go, have a good weekend.

tcoyote
Guest
tcoyote

Don’t be bashful, Neimon. Tell us what you really think of those greedy boomers. You aren’t by any chance still living at home, are you? Actually, there is a coverage strategy which does not rely on mandates. You could generate cash for health insurance subsidies for the lower income uninsured by reducing the huge subsidies for health providers- tax exemption, “indirect medical education”, disproportionate share, etc. It’s likely at least $100 billion if you add all those up,and they are there to compensate providers in one way or another for the uninsured. Why not do what Massachusetts tried to do… Read more »

Neimon
Guest
Neimon

“I wonder how baby boomers see their elder care being taken of by their “GenXer” kids who think the world is all about them and have had everything so don’t appreciate anything. Acually I think a better term for them is “Generation Rx”.” I dunno. How do gen-xers think they’ll pay for the locust generation that consumed and ruined everything ahead of them? Who took all the good jobs, speculated in markets that destroyed real investment in real infrastructure like, say, hospitals and bridges and roads, for air-head gains in a tech-sector that never existed and destroyed the concept of… Read more »

Bill
Guest
Bill

Health “insurance” is really a misnomer, as what is out there today is more a combination of comprehensive insurance coupled with prepaid routine maintenance. If one moved back to traditional insurance at realistic annual deductibles, then the cost of mandatory coverage would be affordable. It’s the prepaid maintenance that drives up the cost.
In addition, when consumers realized that they would incur the higher out of pocket costs by failing to take care of themselves, then they would have reason to engage in healthier behaviors.

Bill
Guest
Bill

Health “insurance” is really a misnomer, as what is out there today is more a combination of comprehensive insurance coupled with prepaid routine maintenance. If one moved back to traditional insurance at realistic annual deductibles, then the cost of mandatory coverage would be affordable. It’s the prepaid maintenance that drives up the cost.
In addition, when consumers realized that they would incur the higher out of pocket costs by failing to take care of themselves, then they would have reason to engage in healthier behaviors.

Peter
Guest
Peter

As with taxes or car insurance we all know mandates work for the benefit of all. Well, maybe not taxes so much when the wealthy can get their fair share made not so fair through political friends in high places. On second thought maybe not car insurance either as we all pay an uninsured driver premium. However I still say we cannot mandate people into a broke and expensive system, but we also can’t bring enough money into the system without a mandate; “That’s another nice mess you got me into Oly”. As for the mandate reducing premiums, I think… Read more »