Uncategorized

PHARMA/POLICY/POLITICS: Medicare Part D–A mess that will need fixing when the grown-ups get back into power

Last week the most convoluted program in the history of Medicare began. I’ve heard comments from friends, neighbors and people in the press saying that they can’t make heads or tails of the new drug benefit. The Washington Post piled in on Saturday with yet more about how confused seniors are.

Whether you like it or loathe it, there are some interesting parts of the Medicare Modernization Act, including the HSA provision and the disease management provisions. But the main event–drug coverage–is neither rational nor ideologically consistent. It’s a dog’s breakfast put together to ensure that the PBMs and some private health plans have something extra to sell, and so that the pharmaceutical companies don’t have to deal directly with the government on pricing.

Now seniors are going to have to deal with a donut hole, out-of-pocket costs, in-network and out-of-network pharmacies, and deciding whether their employer-sponsored coverage is going to stay around. No wonder they’re confused.

And despite all this, the cost to taxpayers is going to be double what Congress was told it would be. Drug coverage for everyone (especially seniors) is needed. But the only prediction I can make is that a more fiscally and socially responsible government–should we get one–will be forced to re-sort this mess in the very near future.

Technorati: , , , , , , ,

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

16
Leave a Reply

16 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
Christina BlechaMs. Induced DimentiaLeo ChenBen CrockerRon Greiner Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Christina Blecha
Guest
Christina Blecha

I am a 70 year old low income senior, not on Medicaid. Currently having problems having prescription Restasis filled (dry eyes, Sjorgen’s syndrome). Constantly on the phone, calling first Health Net Orange, then Express Scripts, a mail order company. They reported they never received 1st prescription, then did not fill 2nd prescription, because they needed prior authorization. They did not tell me this until 3 weeks or so had elapsed. Dr. then faxed prior authorization, and I received confirmation of this (by mail) from Health Net Orange, which stated the authorization for Restasis was in the system. Guess again. Spoke… Read more »

Ms. Induced Dimentia
Guest
Ms. Induced Dimentia

Medicare Part D is designed to confuse. Don’t be razzle-dazzled by which or what to choose – there is but one choice – not to sign up. This will bog Part D down in the mud in which it was created. The largest category of seniors are those paying out of pocket for their prescriptions. This is the group plan D sets up to pay for the care of the next largest group – those who are unable to pay for their medications. Seniors who escape this extra burden are those who are on retirement plans which include a drug… Read more »

Leo Chen
Guest
Leo Chen

This is by way of anecdotal information. There is a group of six of us retired folks who meet for coffee at McDonald’s every morning. Some of us have Medigap. We all have Medicare A&B. None of us plans to sign up for Part D. Why? Part D is not comprehensive in its coverage, (what with the nonsensical “donut hole”) which in turn supports our belief that the rest of the Part D must also be suspect. The premiums can and will change annually, and upwardly. We also can’t convince ourselves that its value as a “catastrophic prescription drug benefit”… Read more »

Ben Crocker
Guest
Ben Crocker

I’m curious that there is no discussion or comment anywhere I have looked about the contents of the PDP formularies, except for the indirect information available via the Medicare Website. The formularies vary a good deal in regards the amount of management tools, AKA prior authorization, quantity limits or high copays, and they don’t all list the same drugs. All this can change, and in fact is changing now, I have been monitoring some of the formularies. The formularies are just a part of what people need to consider, and the way the prior authorization and other limits will be… Read more »

Ron Greiner
Guest

List the Medigap plan that will pay for $20,000 a year Rx bill. Did you say AARP has one or am I exactly right again?
I notice no one came to your defense on this one. It’s interesting that you thought seniors could buy Rx coverage in America when that would be against the law. The government Medigap plans A – J were not a good answer for you was it Matthew?
Next you will say you won this arguement like you always do. Trust me Matthew, you can’t win because you are so wrong.

Matthew Holt
Guest
Matthew Holt

10 lines only Ron….

Ron Greiner
Guest

Matthew, You are right and wrong. You are correct that the vote on the Rx Bill was held open as conservatives were “Won Over” with the tax free HSA. Exactly like I said, geeez. At that exact moment in TIME I became a Bush Republican, hez a wizard. My Representative, Lee Terry (R-NE) knew I would stand up in his meetings, again, and rake him over the coals he he would of voted “NO” against the HSA. So in a small way I feel a bit thankful that I harrassed my own Rep. so much. You are confused about seniors… Read more »

Matthew Holt
Guest
Matthew Holt

Ron, I’m a US citizen and I can badmouth the President, you, or anyone else all I like, and cut the crap about who won WWII. The Germans had already turned back from invading the UK before the US got into the war, and WWII was actually won by the Russians. Not that I’d expect a fool like you to know any history, but you might stop insulting me personally. Unfortunately you also don’t know anything about health care. You say “it was illegal for a senior to purchase Rx coverage in America before this Rx Bill.” Have you never… Read more »

Ron Greiner
Guest

Let me help you confused people out. If a senior is spending $1,000/month or $12,000/year on Rx the Max they can owe is $3,600/yr plus 5% coinsurance with the new Rx coverage (with the ultra confusing donut hole and all). It’s pretty simple for seniors who are paying a lot for Rx. The President promised Rx coverage in Medicare and he delivered. Everybody knows the Rx bill was passed because of HSAs. Tom Baker thinks the HSA is a sideshow, ha ha. Dr. Eric wants to find out what the Dems want, that’s funny too. The Dems are the party… Read more »

Gregory D. Pawelski
Guest
Gregory D. Pawelski

“The Durbin-Berry-Schakowsky bill…. the Medicare Prescription Drug Savings and Choice Act of 2005 (H.R.752/S 345)….. A. Establish a standard drug-coverage plan administered by Medicare. B. Mandate negotiated prices for prescription drugs. By creating at least one standard drug-coverage plan administered by Medicare nationwide, this Democratic alternative would provide a simple option for those confused with the complexities of the plethora of competing private plans. With a recent Kaiser report finding more then 60% of seniors to not understand the program, a standard Medicare plan will help alleviate the current confusion with prescription drug benefit. Negotiating group-purchasing agreements with the drug… Read more »

Eric Novack
Guest
Eric Novack

Matthew- I would make the case that we (the USA) cannot afford the program now. Reps from Cato and Heritage have made excellent arguments why this is so. One of the problems, as you know, with the program is the issue of “dual eligibles”– perhaps the most vulnerable group who are both on medicare and medicaid. The current system has problems, but is at least a known entity. This is a bad bill- re: drug plan- both sides ought to recommend its post-ponement. BTW- if you have info on what the Democrats will be campaigning on in 2006, you might… Read more »

Matthew Holt
Guest
Matthew Holt

Eric. If I was King, I’d stop it and immediately replace it with a totally reformed universal health care system that included drug coverage. In the real world if the choice is this or nothing, I’ll take this only because it’s such a screw-up that the Democrats can win back the Congress by campaigning to fix the mess the Republicans caused, and it does give some small measure of coverage to some poorer seniors who don’t get it now. Plus it wastes a lot less money than Bush’s fun other adventures in the desert and mortgaging my (and your) kids’… Read more »

Eric Novack
Guest
Eric Novack

Matthew– that is not a real answer to my question– you do, then, support the implementation of what you call a “dog’s breakfast”?

Tom Baker
Guest
Tom Baker

I find it very interesting that big Pharma increasingly sees the MMA as perhaps less than it was cracked up to be. Every exec I’ve spoken to foresees inevitable price erosion. Ideally (i.e. from the vantage of the overall health system and economy), this will lead to a shift in incentives, reducing the number of me-too drugs.
On the other hand, I am not at all confident that HSAs will amount to anything other than a small sideshow, at best. At worst, we’ll see substantial outcomes losses as seniors zealously protect their “savings”, rather than seeking necessary care.

Matthew Holt
Guest
Matthew Holt

It doesn’t need to be delayed. It needs to be fixed. No chance of that with the current bunch of clowns running the country. Hence the needs for grown-ups, (of which I grant you McCain is one).