NEW @ THCB PRESS: Surviving Workplace Wellness. Spring 2014. Al Lewis and Vik Khanna. e-book edition. # LIGHTHOUSE Healthcare. Illuminated.

An interesting conversation recently took place among residency program directors in my field of Internal Medicine.

At issue was the declining pass rate of first-time test takers of the ABIM Certification Exam.

It’s a mouthful to say, but the ABIM exam is the ultimate accolade for internists; one is only eligible to take the exam after having successfully completed a three-year residency training period (the part that includes “internship,” right after medical school).

An easy analogy is to say that the board exam is for a doctor what the bar exam is for a lawyer. The difference is that a doctor can still practice if s/he does not pass–they might be excluded from certain jobs or hospital staffs; but certification, while important, is a bit of gilding the lily. [Licensure to practice comes from a different set of exams.]

There’s no doubt it’s a hard test. I was tremendously relieved to have passed it on my first try. Over the last few years, the pass rate for first time takers has fallen from ~90% to a low of 84%.

It may not seem significant, but for 7300 annual test takers, the difference in pass rates affects about 365 people–or one additional non-passing doctor for every day of the year.

In any event, we program directors have taken note. And the falling pass rate has raised questions:

  • Has the test increased in difficulty? No, says the ABIM.
  • Are the study habits of millennials not up to the level of Baby Boomers and Gen X’ers? Now you may be on to something.

One concern that has a ring of truth to it is that young doctors have become great “looker-uppers,” and have lost the sense of what it’s like to actually read and study medicine. While doctors enter the profession with a commitment to lifelong learning, some of us fear that the young folk only go far enough to commit to lifelong googling.

Another key point: in today’s era of restricted work hours, something has to give. Too often, when residents must complete the same amount of work in a limited amount of time, what’s sacrificed is the didactic portion of the education: the stuff we do by running through case after case, discussing subtleties and action plans. When time is limited, the work’s simply gotta get done.

There’s even a term that describes this phenomenon: Work compression.

John H. Schumann, MD is a general internist and medical educator at the University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine in Tulsa, OK . He is also author of the blog,GlassHospital (@GlassHospital), where this post originally appeared.

Share on Twitter

13 Responses for “Why Are So Many Younger Doctors Failing Their Boards?”

  1. Genius says:

    They are being dumbed down by the HIT devices they are forced to use. I see this every minute of every day.

    Nurses have become stupid (but good clickers), interns know nothing (thye use their smarties to look up), students think the computer is the patient, and folks like Topol [pontificate about HIT innovations but never examine or manage patients in the clinic.

    Even former ONCHIT Chief Blumenthal settled a med mal case in which the results were in the computer but no one saw them.

  2. r13 says:

    @Genius – dare I say, that was…genius.

    I agree re Topol – these health IT guys go on about the benefits of technology and are removed from real practice.

    And working in a VA, the issue of ‘it’s in there’ takes on a whole new meaning. Home organizer Barbara Hemphill has an expression she uses to explain the importance of getting rid of paper – ‘if you have it but can’t find it, it’s the same as not being there’.

    And to the article and Bubba’s points – there are only so many hours in the day. Add societal and millenial ADD, plus the availability of Google, and you get a real laziness-piecemeal thinking-lack of hours to learn what is needed trifecta.

    And this only adds to the ordering a pile of tests-stuck with our face in the keyboard-going through the industrial factory line of patients issues that current practitioners are already dealing with. Not sure how we bring some of the humanity, laying of hands, and broad knowledge back to the care of people.

  3. Happy Hospitalist says:

    What affect is lower objective academic standards for med school acceptance to increase diversity having on the objective success rate down stream? Perhaps it’s something to study and define.

    http://thehappyhospitalist.blogspot.com/2011/01/medical-school-acceptance-rates-by-race.html

  4. legacyflyer says:

    Or perhaps the exam is harder.

    What did you expect the ABIM to say?

  5. Vinny Arora says:

    Interesting post- I did hear the question banks did need to get refreshed after a board review cheating scandal a few years ago…

    infusing new questions into the pool (esp if they did not have time to test the questions) could make the test harder…just a thought. it does not likely explain everything, but its just something to consider.

    i wonder if ACP – ITE exam scores have been going down at this same time – that may speak to something that is more intrinsic to residents or their training – as opposed to something specific with the test.

  6. socrates says:

    The American Board of Pediatrics has an even lower pass rate than the ABIM, it has been hovering around 70-75% for the past 20 years.

  7. I agree this development is a concern, but before we ascribe blame to health IT, Gen Y/millenial laziness, or anything else, can we see some data supporting the assignment of blame? Let’s not let this finding be a Rorschach test for everything each of us does not like about medicine, healthcare, or society.

    In the meantime, however, I have a more fundamental question: Is an exam like the ABIM the best indicator of how a physician best applies his or her knowledge to the optimal care of patients? In other words, when it comes to applying knowledge to real patients, does it matter whether the knowledge resides in the physician’s head or is easily accessible on a computer? Do we want performance on this test to be the standard by which we judge the competence of physicians? I thought we were getting away from that approach.

    Instead, why don’t we test physicians by some sort of vignette process, whereby they are presented with a case, armed with their brain, their computer, and anything else they want to use? Then we can see who orders the right tests, prescribes the right treatment, etc.?

  8. tnfalpha says:

    This “Gilding the lily” as you call it raises the question of what is the motive for having this exam in the first place? Essentially, it seems like justification for our high salaries. If we have to pass a really hard exam, then we are worth the $200k. No one seems to be asking if IM physicians really need to know all the stuff on the exam to be competent physicians. Is someone a better doctor because they can name – off the top of their head – the drug used to treat a pregnant woman with syphilis who happens to be allergic to penicillin? Frankly, I’d prefer my doctor to take the 15 seconds it takes to google that than try to remember it from their med school training.

    ABIM of course would say the exam isn’t harder. Unfortunately, they have an incentive to justify these high salaries, and having less people pass increases that cache. We should do a couple things:
    1. stop criticizing young trainees because they’re “different” than the old guard – they’re less empathetic, they’re less dedicated, they’re chronic googlers. Seriously, you’re just revealing your age and grumpyness. Hey kids, get off my lawn! Yawn.
    2. Focus exams closer to real practice like what Dr. Hersh suggested above. People whined when kids could use calculators for math and science exams; now they are considered an accurate reflection of the skills kids need when they’re outside the classroom. I know medicine is about 50 years behind any educational or operations management innovations, but lets try cutting that down to, say, 10 and we’ll be in much better shape

  9. TChanMD says:

    @Tnfalpha:

    Re: your points:

    Re: 1 – Eric Holmboe (renowned medical educator and internist) just wrote on his twitter account: ‘Beware Nostalgiaitis Imperfecta’. Genius.

    Re 2- Love the point of view you and Dr. Hersh have stated: “Focus exams closer to real practice.”

    There are probably a bunch more factors, and we can likely innovate faster than what we have done in the past. Technology is exponential, and we have not grown even linearly. :D

    I wrote a longer reply at this site – http://t.co/CuvwWXHsAF – in defense of my fellow GenY/Millennial folks :D

    TChanMD

  10. “Focus exams closer to real practice.” Brilliant.
    ‘Beware Nostalgiaitis Imperfecta’. Again, brilliant.

    There is, however, a missing educational component that we discovered in corporate America. We called these the Critical Success Factors for Learning.”

    Technology dependency is still dependency.

  11. Reading “The Creative Destruction of Medicine” by Eric Topol, M.D. shows one possible future, as well.

  12. Ils reposent sur un concept d’ordinateurs portables proches des netbooks (léger et économique) animé par le système d’exploitation Chrome OS qui organise toutes ses fonctionnalités autour du cloud (donc du web), notamment en ligne sur où il est en précommande depuis le 15 juin.48%) et Altice (24, La réorganisation de lentreprise intervenue en mai dernier sest inscrite dans cette logique. et se rend indispensable pour jongler avec les différents formats vidéos et audio (MPEG-1, VLC Media Player est un élément important de FreePlayer,01 pour Windows?Le système de jeu est simple, la sortie grand public du photophone Lumia 1020 et son capteur de 41 mégapixels. malgré quelques divergences dans leurs estimations respectives.

Leave a Reply

MASTHEAD


Matthew Holt
Founder & Publisher

John Irvine
Executive Editor

Jonathan Halvorson
Editor

Alex Epstein
Director of Digital Media

Munia Mitra, MD
Chief Medical Officer

Vikram Khanna
Editor-At-Large, Wellness

Maithri Vangala
Associate Editor

Michael Millenson
Contributing Editor










About Us | Media Guide | E-mail | 415.562.7957 | Support THCB
© THCB 2005-2013
WRITE FOR US

We're looking for bloggers. Send us your posts.

If you've had a recent experience with the U.S. health care system, either for good or bad, that you want the world to know about, tell us.

Have a good health care story you think we should know about? Send story ideas and tips to editor@thehealthcareblog.com.

ADVERTISE

Want to reach an insider audience of healthcare insiders and industry observers? THCB reaches 500,000 movers and shakers. Find out about advertising options here.

Questions on reprints, permissions and syndication to ad_sales@thehealthcareblog.com.

THCB CLASSIFIEDS

Reach a super targeted healthcare audience with your text ad. Target physicians, health plan execs, health IT and other groups with your message.
ad_sales@thehealthcareblog.com
WORK FOR US

Interested in the intersection of healthcare, technology and business? We're looking for talented interns to work in our San Francisco offices. Get in touch.

Wordpress guru? We're looking for a part time web-developer to help take THCB to the next level. Drop us a line.

BLOGROLL

If you'd like to be considered for our Blogroll, drop us an email and we'll take a look. While you're at it, why not add us to yours?

SUPPORT
Let us know about a glitch or a technical problem.

Report spam or abuse here.

Sign up for the THCB Reader here.
Log in - Powered by WordPress.