It was just a matter of time until this would happen.

Buried in the middle of this New York Times article on The Ups and Downs of Electronic Medical Records is the observation that a Medicare administrative contractor dubbed National Government Services has announced that it, on behalf of CMS, will “deny payment” for medical services that are documented in an electronic health record (EHR) using “cloned documentation.”

The topic was covered more than 2 years ago. “Cloned documentation” is the widespread practice of copying, pasting past documentation in an EHR into the current encounter record to inflate the recorded patient evaluation to primarily justify a higher payment. Thanks to this OIG report, the Feds have figured out that the true value proposition for an EHR is not “meaningful use” but wasteful abuse.

In addition to congratulating the Times for their crack cutting-edge reporting, here is a prediction…

1. The mere threat of payment denials and the possibility of sanctions will prompt health administrators everywhere to announce at medical staff meetings that “cloned” notes are verboten.

2. Until the “templated note” functionality is deleted in future EHR software updates, physicians will respond to this latest edict from their administrators in the traditional manner: they’ll ignore it.

3. Once the cloned note option is no longer available in the course of a patient encounter and physicians actually have to manually type out much of their encounter notes, patients will wonder why their docs are spending even MORE time staring at the computer screens and less time talking to them.

4. As clinic work flows get even more gummed up and waiting lists expand, outfits like National Government Services will announce that it will deny payment for documented medical services that are not provided in a timely manner.

Silly you say? Think again.

Jaan Sidorov, MD, is a primary care internist and former Medical Director at Geisinger Health Plan with over 20 years experience in primary care, disease management and population-based care coordination. He shares his knowledge and insights at Disease Management Care Blog, where this post first appeared.

Share on Twitter

12 Responses for “Outlawing Templated Notes in the Electronic Health Record”

  1. The Dichotomy is very well put. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

    One of the biggest impediments to adoption of EMR has been reduction in productivity versus paper and pen.

    But, just like everything else, it is so easy to blame the tools and technology for all the malaise affecting healthcare. If the intent is to ‘overcode’, then nothing can stop the providers from doing so. You remove ‘templates’, there will be something else that they will figure out.

    Un-Templating is obviously not the solution.

  2. Randall Oates, M.D. says:

    Outlawing templated notes in the EHR either means more doctors as distracted data trolls seeing fewer patients with more work, or it is time to go to Medical Care Coordinators™ who remotely do the data entry/management and free up doctors to be doctors who can see more patients with less total work. This is far more productive and less intrusive than pen paper and collects the data needed to improve care.
    But… old habits and obsolete EHR systems/processes die hard.

  3. BobbyG says:

    Wonder what the Praxis EMR people would have to say about this.

  4. rbaer says:

    I think this problem is one created by physicians, in collaboration with maybe somewhat inconsiderate introduction of EMR.

    I think that “note bloat” and improper use of template is a real problem for complex patients. As long as we do not have good alternatives that have been a good track record for the specialty/patient population at hand, physicians should just go back and dictate notes. EMR does not mean that physicians must use templates or history checklists (not Gawandes checklists, in case someone wonders) – our entire institution (which is os meaningful in its EMR use) uses mostly dictated notes in outpatient care, and copying and pasting appears limited and reasonable. In other words, you can document just fine with an EMR if you want to.

  5. Randall Oates, M.D. says:

    Dictation (with or without NLP) is still a great solution if you have no need for consistent sets of structured data based on best practices and have no need to improve physicians efficiency and capacity. Meaningful use is just the tip of the iceberg as far as requiring real data. Just wait, the need for more data at the same time as the fees for services system wanes, a lot of obsolete approaches are going to implode.

  6. MD as HELL says:

    Baaaah!
    Moooo!

  7. SJ Motew, MD says:

    I have performed and then written, dictated or templated the same ‘normal’ comprehensive physical examination since I have been in practice. The vitals, gender specific differences and basic physical descriptors are of course unique, however the use of templated PhEx has saved me time and provided reproducible accuracy.

    If I were to de-evolve back to written notes, the content would be no different, what is the difference then other than more and less accurate work?

  8. MD as HELL says:

    The systems were certified by the feds…i am happy to just dictate. They wanted the data to be interoperable and transferable. It is a big pain in the butt for us real docs.

  9. bird says:

    I have been on emr for over ten years, the selling points were the ability to increase coding, easy documentation via template, would be mandated at some point by payors and gov’t.

    Fast forward 10 years, all those aspects of the emr are now being used against use. Thank you HIT community

  10. @JayM_HealthIT says:

    There is a distinction to be made between copy/paste a previous providers note into your own VS templated documentation
    and It does not seem to be being made.

  11. Craig "Quack" Vickstrom, M.D. says:

    Remember how EMR’s were sold to us as “you see fewer patients, but with cut and paste you can meet the requirements for higher codes for the patients yo do see?”

    Bait, meet switch.

Leave a Reply

FROM THE VAULT

The Power of Small Why Doctors Shouldn't Be Healers Big Data in Healthcare. Good or Evil? Depends on the Dollars. California's Proposition 46 Narrow Networking
MASTHEAD STUFF

MATTHEW HOLT
Founder & Publisher

JOHN IRVINE
Executive Editor

JONATHAN HALVORSON
Editor

JOE FLOWER
Contributing Editor

MICHAEL MILLENSON
Contributing Editor

ALEX EPSTEIN
Director of Digital Media

MICHELLE NOTEBOOM Business Development

MUNIA MITRA, MD
Clinical Medicine

Vikram Khanna
Editor-At-Large, Wellness

THCB FROM A-Z

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
@THCBStaff

WHERE IN THE WORLD WE ARE

The Health Care Blog (THCB) is based in San Francisco. We were founded in 2004 by Matthew Holt and John Irvine.

MEDIA REQUESTS

Interview Requests + Bookings. We like to talk. E-mail us.

BLOGGING
Yes. We're looking for bloggers. Send us your posts.

STORY TIPS
Breaking health care story? Drop us an e-mail.

CROSSPOSTS

We frequently accept crossposts from smaller blogs and major U.S. and International publications. You'll need syndication rights. Email a link to your submission.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR

Op-eds. Crossposts. Columns. Great ideas for improving the health care system. Pitches for healthcare-focused startups and business.Write ups of original research. Reviews of new healthcare products and startups. Data-driven analysis of health care trends. Policy proposals. E-mail us a copy of your piece in the body of your email or as a Google Doc. No phone calls please!

THCB PRESS

Healthcare focused e-books and videos for distribution via THCB and other channels like Amazon and Smashwords. Want to get involved? Send us a note telling us what you have in mind. Proposals should be no more than one page in length.

HEALTH SYSTEM $#@!!!
If you've healthcare professional or consumer and have had a recent experience with the U.S. health care system, either for good or bad, that you want the world to know about, tell us about it. Have a good health care story you think we should know about? Send story ideas and tips to editor@thehealthcareblog.com.

REPRINTS Questions on reprints, permissions and syndication to ad_sales@thehealthcareblog.com.

WHAT WE COVER

HEALTHCARE, GENERAL

Affordable Care Act
Business of Health Care
National health policy
Life on the front lines
Practice management
Hospital managment
Health plans
Prevention
Specialty practice
Oncology
Cardiology
Geriatrics
ENT
Emergency Medicine
Radiology
Nursing
Quality, Costs
Residency
Research
Medical education
Med School
CMS
CDC
HHS
FDA
Public Health
Wellness

HIT TOPICS
Apple
Analytics
athenahealth
Electronic medical records
EPIC
Design
Accountable care organizations
Meaningful use
Interoperability
Online Communities
Open Source
Privacy
Usability
Samsung
Social media
Tips and Tricks
Wearables
Workflow
Exchanges

EVENTS

TedMed
HIMSS South x South West
Health 2.0
WHCC
AHIP
AHIMA
Log in - Powered by WordPress.