Innovative thinkers and influential healthcare leaders aren’t relying on the decisions coming out of HHS to determine their strategy.  Despite the fact that many healthcare organizations were on target to transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10, Health and Human Services (HHS) announced it would initiate a process to postpone the date by which certain healthcare entities have to comply with ICD-10.

The details of the delay have not been revealed, but industry experts are speculating that a one-two year delay is in the works.  With only 20 months remaining to the Oct. 1, 2013 deadline, this leaves many organizations in limbo.  Do they continue down the path of ICD-10 adoption, revise plans based on speculation about a new timeline or completely put the initiative on hold?

The leaders in healthcare never limited their thinking to a coding mandate.  They were aligning their ICD-10 efforts with quality of care initiatives- EMR adoption and improved clinical documentation.  They won’t hesitate, they won’t miss a step, and they will focus on providing exceptional care through improved processes, many of which will prepare them for a successful transition to ICD-10 and ICD-11.

The following areas of focus will improve quality of care, reporting and accuracy of reimbursement.

-        Lead with purpose- understand the long-term impact of a coding mandate and help providers understand the alignment of greater specificity in coding with quality reporting, improved clinical documentation and clinical decision support.

-        Take this time to improve clinical documentation- develop processes and feedback to improve how physicians and other providers document care.  This effort will reap financial benefits and directly impact quality of care and reporting.

-        Invest in educating coders- coders will benefit from increased knowledge in anatomy and physiology under any coding system.  Introduce the changes in coding structure that will come with ICD-10 and ICD-11.

-        Appeal to the provider’s intellect- roles and responsibilities continue to evolve in healthcare.  Help the provider understand their role in clinical documentation and responsibility for greater specificity in describing care.

Lead an effort focused on improved clinical documentation, not on coding.  Healthcare leaders who develop a purpose greater than a mandate path will be the clear winners from a quality reporting and reimbursement perspective.  Those who use the delay as another reason to “wait” put their organizations at financial risk and will lag behind the industry leaders with or without a delay.

Share on Twitter

5 Responses for “Seizing the Opportunity in the ICD-10 Delay”

  1. I totally agree that the documentation improvement is the perfect way to bring along all aspects of the organization into preparedness for ICD-10 implementation. This also highlights the startling disconnect in the AMA-spurred CMS decision. ICD-10 preparation is the perfect “grease on the wheels” for EMR and quality initiatives via documentation improvement. Separating them just multiplies headaches.

    • Greg Park says:

      I read many publications that state a delay in ICD-10 will cost providers more than keeping to the original date, but most of this argument is coming from vendors and consultants who have a vested interest in keeping 10/01/13.

      From my perspective the delay is a benefit, although like a worn Band-Aid I would welcome its quick removal.

      Our organization is probably in the middle of the pack in regards to ICD-10 readiness. We have begun investigation into Education, IT and Payer readiness and associated workflows. This is a start and we still have a ton of work to do to be properly prepared.

      But what is the essential benefit behind ICD-10? I would contend it is the force that drives improvements in documentation, and THIS will continue with or without a firm ICD-10 deadline. Our leadership has seen THAT writing on the wall and the message is clear. Improved documentation will drive improved results and increased reimbursements.

      When ICD-10 does become “real”, we will be well prepared and our financial impact swing will be minimal because we have focused on quality documentation that fit ICD-10 standards. We will also keep a keen eye on ICD-11 to assure we pave the road towards smooth adoption of that standard in the possibility it becomes a working reality within the next 8 years.

      If you are a provider that has invested tons of cash into coder education, I am sorry but you may have to spend that money again if the delay is substantial. It is likely that coders will lose this knowledge without regular ICD-10 practice.

      So my question to you (random web traveler to come across this lonely little diatribe), what are the negative implications of a delayed ICD-10? Also, what factors in MU2 rely on ICD-10?

      Peace!

      • Greg,

        You actually make the case for ICD-10 perfectly:

        “But what is the essential benefit behind ICD-10? I would contend it is the force that drives improvements in documentation, and THIS will continue with or without a firm ICD-10 deadline. Our leadership has seen THAT writing on the wall and the message is clear. Improved documentation will drive improved results and increased reimbursements.”

        Your documentation improvements are only grabbing the reimbursement that you organization has been leaving on the table, likely not catching complications and comorbidities or being able to assign higher reimbursement DRGs. The current reimbursement system is based on the broken ICD-9 system, which has literally run out of codes and can’t capture the latest technologies or clinical diagnoses in the record. ICD-10 will allow providers to be better reimbursed based on the real clinical picture, with its finer granularity.

        The benefits also extended to patients. Here’s a link to a discussion on my blog about how ICD-10 can positively impact patient care:
        http://mcod.us/yBVDgb

  2. Heather Haugen says:

    Greg and Dr. Carter, I believe we are all in agreement. A focus on clinical documentation today has both short-term and long-term benefits. Additionally, most providers are not interested in a coding mandate, but they are interested in improving quality of care and reporting.

    My conversations with hospital CIOs at HIMSS (last week) were really interesting. Many of them believe the delay will increase the total spend to prepare for ICD-10 because they will likely lose some momentum until the final delay is announced. They may also have some rework for activities that were dependent on the original dates.

    Great discussion, thanks for the comments.

    Heather Haugen PhD
    Corporate VP of Research- The Breakaway Group
    Director of HIT- University of Colorado

  3. gs keyword1 says:

    It’s a very powerful ICD-9, ICD-10, CPT

Leave a Reply

FROM THE VAULT

The Power of Small Why Doctors Shouldn't Be Healers Big Data in Healthcare. Good or Evil? Depends on the Dollars. California's Proposition 46 Narrow Networking
MASTHEAD STUFF

MATTHEW HOLT
Founder & Publisher

JOHN IRVINE
Executive Editor

JONATHAN HALVORSON
Editor

JOE FLOWER
Contributing Editor

MICHAEL MILLENSON
Contributing Editor

ALEX EPSTEIN
Director of Digital Media

MICHELLE NOTEBOOM Business Development

MUNIA MITRA, MD
Clinical Medicine

Vikram Khanna
Editor-At-Large, Wellness

THCB FROM A-Z

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
@THCBStaff

WHERE IN THE WORLD WE ARE

The Health Care Blog (THCB) is based in San Francisco. We were founded in 2004 by Matthew Holt and John Irvine.

MEDIA REQUESTS

Interview Requests + Bookings. We like to talk. E-mail us.

BLOGGING
Yes. We're looking for bloggers. Send us your posts.

STORY TIPS
Breaking health care story? Drop us an e-mail.

CROSSPOSTS

We frequently accept crossposts from smaller blogs and major U.S. and International publications. You'll need syndication rights. Email a link to your submission.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR

Op-eds. Crossposts. Columns. Great ideas for improving the health care system. Pitches for healthcare-focused startups and business.Write ups of original research. Reviews of new healthcare products and startups. Data-driven analysis of health care trends. Policy proposals. E-mail us a copy of your piece in the body of your email or as a Google Doc. No phone calls please!

THCB PRESS

Healthcare focused e-books and videos for distribution via THCB and other channels like Amazon and Smashwords. Want to get involved? Send us a note telling us what you have in mind. Proposals should be no more than one page in length.

HEALTH SYSTEM $#@!!!
If you've healthcare professional or consumer and have had a recent experience with the U.S. health care system, either for good or bad, that you want the world to know about, tell us about it. Have a good health care story you think we should know about? Send story ideas and tips to editor@thehealthcareblog.com.

REPRINTS Questions on reprints, permissions and syndication to ad_sales@thehealthcareblog.com.

WHAT WE COVER

HEALTHCARE, GENERAL

Affordable Care Act
Business of Health Care
National health policy
Life on the front lines
Practice management
Hospital managment
Health plans
Prevention
Specialty practice
Oncology
Cardiology
Geriatrics
ENT
Emergency Medicine
Radiology
Nursing
Quality, Costs
Residency
Research
Medical education
Med School
CMS
CDC
HHS
FDA
Public Health
Wellness

HIT TOPICS
Apple
Analytics
athenahealth
Electronic medical records
EPIC
Design
Accountable care organizations
Meaningful use
Interoperability
Online Communities
Open Source
Privacy
Usability
Samsung
Social media
Tips and Tricks
Wearables
Workflow
Exchanges

EVENTS

TedMed
HIMSS South x South West
Health 2.0
WHCC
AHIP
AHIMA
Log in - Powered by WordPress.