Categories

Above the Fold

T-Shirt Health 2.0 conference ego surfing

So this is how fashion insurgencies start…Brian Klepper sent me this email. I assume they felt like the two Hollywood starlets who show up at the Oscars wearing the same dress!

“So David Foster, Director of Product Management for Healthwise, visits Jax where he’s from. Because he reads THCB, he knows that I’m here, and so he drops me a note suggesting we meet at the Beaches Diner for breakfast this a.m. I’m in standard uniform, shorts and a t-shirt. I walk in and he’s wearing the same shirt. I think this means you’ve officially become a brand. We had the cashier take a picture to prove it.”

Health 2.0 Tshirts

Health spending disconnect

There’s a disconnect between who Americans believe is responsible for their personal health status, and who should pay for health care.

On the first question — personal responsibility for health choices — 82 percent of Americans believe that they alone are responsible for their health.

However, only 44 percent believe that they should bear no responsibility for paying for health care.

The Vitality Group, a subsidiary of Discovery Holdings Ltd., surveyed Americans and found that most people (59%) look to their employer to bear at least some responsibility for health costs. Nearly one in two (46%) see the government as a payer.

Only 56 percent of Americans see themselves as picking up any part of health care costs.

Continue reading…

Voters shielded from high health costs don’t see the residual impact

The health care issue has a history of being named by voters as one of the biggest problems we face — until the problem de jour comes along and pushes it off the list. In 2008, that seems to be happening again with the economic downturn, the mortgage mess, and $4 gas surpassing health care as the big issues.

When asked to name the most important financial problem facing families today by the Gallup organization:

    * 29% said energy and gas prices    * 18% said the high cost of living and inflation    * 14% said a lack of money and low wages    * 9% said health care costs

Policy experts can point to the high cost of health care but Joe and Mary Middle- America are still clearly sheltered from the real impact of these costs largely by the employers who still provide so many of us with affordable health care.

Continue reading…

Happy Fifth Birthday, THCB

Five years ago today, without really knowing what I was getting myself into, I wrote the first post on The Health Care Blog.

Birthday_2If you forced me to come up with a reason why, I would have told you that I thought that a blog would give me a chance to build my nascent consulting business — although I think the process was actually more useful to re-educate me about health care. I’ve never calculated the time spent on THCB, but I’m pretty sure it hasn’t been a rational financial decision.

The first post was about what was wrong with Medicare (and it’s still equally valid today and probably will be equally valid in 2013!) For the first little while I tried hard to maintain an analytical air about the future, while trying to avoid giving overt opinions. It took me a month before I started editorializing, even though the first one was introduced in a mealy mouthed way—as I somehow didn’t trust people to distinguish between what I thought ought to happen and what I thought was going to happen. But that didn’t last too long, thank heavens.

For the first year or so I was probably writing for myself and about 3 other people. Back then Russ at the late lamented Bloviator was writing about public health, Don Johnson also was writing about health care at The Business Word (Don left blogging but made a comeback and has been an occasional contributor at THCB). Back then my two favorite medical bloggers were MedPundit (who left blogging then came back then eventually left again), and DB’s MedRants who’s still going strong. And of course, although it took me years to find, Mr HIStalk had already staked out the hospital IT market. But in all honesty it took a long while before anyone took us seriously.

Now, the WSJ and New York Times have health-related blogs, and over 800 are listed on the Healthcare 100, even if THCB has fallen a few spots since their recent recalculation! While I’d argue that many of the 800 are not much about health care, but about science and fitness, and that the ranking is pretty arbitrary, there’s no question that—as in technology and politics—health care has been changed by blogging.

In fact THCB has been involved in some of the big debates about the future of health policy, and I’ve had the chance to meet some policy movers and shakers I’d never have met in my old consulting life. Heck, Paul Krugman even devoted a page to THCB in his latest book! (I, of course, only found out when a friend sent me a copy with a note about it!). Nonetheless, I’ve had fun meeting liberal journalists like Jonathan Cohn, libertarian think tank guys like Michael Cannon, and have interviewed a cross section of the intense (Shannon Brownlee), the too-nice for their views (David Gratzer) and the right-wingers barely hanging onto to reality (Grace-Marie Turner). Not to mention lots of fun with early day podcasts with libertarian surgeon Eric Novack, who still makes the odd appearance here.

THCB has also given me and many others the opportunity to see some real changes in health care. The biggest for me personally has been the front row seat I’ve had in the development of Web 2.0 in health care (yes, yes, it’s called Health 2.0). What started as few small conversations 3 years ago has blossomed into a movement, and also for me and my partner Indu Subaiya, a day job! But there are lots of developments that have been covered on THCB and debated by its community, including quality, patient safety, EMRs, HSAs, individual insurance, cost-effectiveness, pharmaceutical marketing, PBMs, technology, and many many more.

And THCB really has changed into a community. Over the years, there have been many regular contributors, including those like Matt Quinn and Brian Klepper who’ve taken over the blog while I’ve been away, and contributed immensely at other times, too. And more recently, THCB has been a venue where other bloggers show some of their best stuff — I want to thank those like Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, Maggie Mahar, Bob Wachter, Paul Levy, Scott Shreeve and several others who let us feature their writing. It’s now very much a group blog — although it was only this year that I started to give my own pieces a byline rather than just assuming that everyone knew it was me! Now I’m happy to be just one of the crowd.

Moreover, THCB has always enjoyed lots of comments. Some are from people passing by just once or twice, but others like Tom Leith, JD (no, not JD Klienke), MG, Peter, tcoyote, Barry Carol and many more have come back time and again to comment and add really valuable insight. Some commentors are gone and much lamented (Theora Jones), some are gone and less so (Stuart Browning) — meanwhile, anyone want Ron Grenier back? Ron remains the only commentator banned from THCB (for outright rudeness), which I think underscores how great the tone of the discussion has been, despite the clear differences of opinion amongst the commentators.

So I want to leave you with two last thoughts.

First, what’s next? Well over the course of the next few months THCB will be continuing to evolve its look — there’ll be more content, more authors, more great debate, and more ways of finding that content. We’re going to be making some changes to the front page and some definitional changes to both make the sections clearer and make some of the best “perennials” easily visible. THCB now has its first professional editor/author, Sarah Arnquist, whom I hope will be using THCB as a stepping stone to her future Pulitzer Prize. She’s a journalist working at THCB while pursuing an MPH at Johns Hopkins. We’ll also be making it a little easier for advertisers to sponsor appropriate sections of THCB. Yup, while THCB has never directly made me a penny, it is finally showing the potential to be a real media site, which brings its own opportunities — and pitfalls.

Second, THCB’s great run wouldn’t have been possible without lots of help. I can’t possibly name everyone but I do want to shout out for a couple. My first assistant on the project was Ginny Pham-Kanter who helped get the blog a little more organized. But after Ginny had to retreat to graduate school, John Pluenneke took over. John’s been running the business and technical side of THCB since 2005 and this blog’s progress is more due to him than anyone else. Thanks, John!

These thank yous wouldn’t be complete without a thanks to everyone who’s ever written for THCB, or posted a comment. A blog is a microphone, but it’s only fun when that microphone is shared around. And finally, of course, thanks to you the readers.

The first few months there were only a few readers every week. When last month THCB had over 50,000 visits, those early days seem very distant. I’m really looking forward to the next five years!

But in the end, it’s all about one person sitting down and writing his or her thoughts and opinions — and hoping that somebody, who they probably have never met and probably never will, comes by to read them. On a personal note, thanks for reading mine. — Matthew Holt

 

 

Healthy Howard coverage expansion could inform future reforms

Howard County, Maryland is set to launch an ambitious universal health coverage, and the county’s top health officials says the effort will provide valuable lessons for future reformers.Fastfacts

Starting next month, 2,200 of Howard County’s 20,000
uninsured residents can enroll in the Healthy Howard Plan,
which will provide them access to primary, specialty and hospital care, and
prescriptions drugs for $85 or less a month.

Dr. Peter Beilenson, Howard County health commissioner and former Baltimore City health commissioner who ran for Congress in 2006, said this is the most ambitious local effort at universal coverage since San Francisco launched a universal coverage plan in April 2007.

Like Healthy San Francisco, Healthy Howard is not portable health insurance but rather health coverage for local treatment. Instead of levying a "pay or play" tax on businesses like San Francisco, however, Healthy Howard’s funding comes from individual premiums, county general fund dollars and substantial amounts of charity. (The Golden gate Restaurant Association is battling San Francisco in court over its tax.)

Beyond the grand ambition to provide universal health coverage, what Beilenson says  distinguishes Healthy Howard is its emphasis on personal responsibility, mandatory health coaching and a forthcoming rigorous evaluation.

Continue reading…

Volunteer doctors blocked by red tape

Volunteer clinicians play a critical role in the current U.S. safety-net health care system and in many health care coverage expansion proposals. Yet, bureaucracy and red tape make it excruciatingly difficult for well-intentioned clinicians to donate their time.

This summer, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Health Centers Renewal Act (H.R. 1343) to provide funding for more safety-net health care centers. But without policies that make it easier for doctors and nurses to volunteer, our shiny new clinics could become empty reminders of a failed effort to improve the public’s health. Also, Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyoming, introduced the Volunteer Health Care Program Act in July to  expand liability protection to volunteer doctors.

I live in Pennsylvania, but am doing a fellowship in Baltimore and want
to volunteer as a primary care doctor in one of they city’s many
clinics for the uninsured. After spending nearly $1,000 and numerous hours jumping through hoops trying to get a Maryland physician’s license, I can say confidently that these are needed reforms. With the time and money I’ve spent so far, I could have easily seen and
helped many patients.

Continue reading…

Revolution Health looking to sell?

Steve Case’s Revolution Health hasn’t quite lived up to the promise trumpeted in early days. Recent rounds of layoffs, changes in overall strategy, and the hiring of an investment bank to explore sales lead one to think that Revolution is closer to circling the drain that it is carrying the banner of a new approach to health care focused on the consumer.

However, one recent rumor about a merger between Glam and Revolution Health reminds us of the direction that health publishing (and potentially health care delivery) are likely to go if we believe that consumer decision-making is important.

Continue reading…

Viagra prescribed more safely online than in regular practice?

Really? Can this be true? Well so says a bunch of academics writing in the Mayo Clinic’s journal.

They looked at records of questionnaires taken and prescribing decisions made by a licensed, regulated online pharmacy called KwikMed — that is trying very hard to establish itself as ethically and legally different from those fly by night guys whose spam comments will rapidly attach to this post! They looked at the various outcomes and end points including safety and level of counseling and found that the online system produced results as good as or better as those found from a big records review in an unnamed (not surprisingly!) large multi-specialty clinic in Salt Lake City, UT.

Now obviously the ability to create an online questionnaire for specific conditions with clear inclusion/exclusion criteria (like ED or hair loss) means that as clear a picture can be gained in most cases from a good history taken online–and probably the history will be given more honestly by the patient. Plus the rigor of the history is probably better than one taken in a rushed office visit. And then it gets reviewed by a doctor who may recommend another approach but most times agrees and sends the Rx on to be filled.

Continue reading…

Gaming for health

By James A. Cooley

James Cooley works for a big Texas state agency doing health care policy analysis and research, with a specialty in health care IT. His research and analysis projects cover e-prescribing, telemedicine, EHR & PHR and beyond. That is his way-cool day gig. At night, he is a passionate computer gamer who builds his own custom rigs and struggles to squeeze out a few more frames per second with everything maxed out.

I admit to a fascination with Health 2.0. I see it as the place where a lot of the things that look promising in health care and technology are all mashing together.Xbox

As a follower of developments in both the health 2.0 movement and the gaming industry, I came across the following article that piqued my interest. It deals with the deal reached between Netflix and Microsoft to facilitate movie downloads to those using the XBOX Live network.

Reading this, I got to thinking it might have implications for Health 2.0. The question: Why not use these emerging gaming and movie delivery platforms to deliver interactive health care and fitness content.

Hmm, I wondered further: Would Netflix consider a deal with Microsoft to permit XBOX 360 users access to free download of certain interactive health care information content? I could see modules for management of certain diseases (including those that impact young people, such as asthma). There could also be modules with health and fitness activities that incorporate interactive video and gaming elements.

Continue reading…

David Hamilton is very smart

In his piece he suggests that data portability will lead to a clash as consumers figure out that it’s not privacy of this data that’s the problem, it’s what insurers do to people they already know information about. And that behavior is inevitable in the absence of political reforms which said clash will cause….at some point.

Of course I think he’s smart because I agreed with him here!

assetto corsa mods