Categories

Tag: Policy

QUALITY/POLICY: Sicko, Deloitte and the reason for EBM

The Deloitte Center for Health Care is best known for being headed by Paul Keckley, recently of the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Vanderbilt, and a minor actor in Michael Moore’s recent spat with CNN. (CNN didn’t come clean that Keckley has consulted for lots of health plans and, horror of horrors, is a Republican).  I personally thought that Moore won that spat pretty convincingly, in that CNN couldn’t spend 12 seconds googling Paul.

The joke is that some of what Paul said was exactly what Moore said. Health care that is free at the point of care is not without cost, as it’s paid for out of general taxation (or some variant of it). Of course, it’s pretty shallow to say Americans don’t like paying tax, but then ignore the fact that they are otherwise (via reduced wages) forced to pay a "private tax" in health costs which massively exceeds that paid in tax to governments in other countries (after all there it adds up to 10% of GDP, here 17%). And I thought Moore was pretty clear in the movie twice (once with Tony Benn in the UK, and once when he went to visit the well-off French couple) that Europeans accepted higher taxes so that they can take care of the poor. Of course they probably don’t realize that in paying higher private taxes they save money overall.

However, the good folks at Deloitte are moving on, led by Paul, to talk more about the problems within the US system, and I suspect that Paul has learned his lesson about letting CNN tape his words without being clear about what their going to do with them and how they’ll represent him.

Instead, Deloitte’s gone to Kansas. Topeka, KS to be precise. Overall Topeka is a mirror of the national average in healthcare delivery data. Their analysis done using Healthgrades’ and other data is that if hospitals in Topeka could just do a little bit better than average they could save over 150 lives a year by just performing a little better–and that in a metro of just under 230,000.

Continue reading…

POLICY/HEALTH PLANS: SCHIP passes the Senate, but I think for now Medicare Advantage is safe…for now

A version of SCHIP that doesn’t touch Medicare passed the Senate last night. It has a veto proof majority. Of course it now has to be reconciled with the house bill that raises more taxes and cuts Medicare Advantage. So this will now go one of two ways. Either the bills will get reconciled along the lines of the Senate bill and probably get signed by Bush, or the emerging bill will have a hack at Medicare Advantage and get vetoed.

My guess is that it’ll be the latter. It’s just too tempting for the Democrats to provoke the veto and then campaign on the fact that Republicans hate children. (Some temporary extension for the current SCHIP will be worked out as it expires in the background).

Meanwhile despite all the rhetoric remember this:

The Congressional Budget Office says the Senate bill would cover 3.2 million uninsured children, including 2.7 million who are currently eligible but not enrolled. The House bill, it said, would cover 4.2 million children, including 3.8 million already eligible for benefits. In addition, both bills would provide money to prevent 800,000 children now on the program from losing coverage.

According to KFF there are 8 million uninsured children today. So we’re only talking about covering up to half of currently uninsured kids. Which makes all the rhetoric about socialized medicine a little overblown. Even though unlike some of the more timid moderate Democrats I’m happy to say that socializing the insurance side of health care —as in putting everyone in one pool — would be a very good idea.

Meanwhile, perhaps the recent pressure on managed care stocks is a little over done? (Far be it from THCB to recommend a buy on UNH, but it’s at $48 which is way below where it’s been for a while!)

UPDATE: AHIP isn’t taking any chances, Its headline in its propaganda this morning is (I shit you not) "House Votes to Push Millions of Seniors out of Medicare Advantage"  Click thru and you can see a video of my favorite lobbyist telling only a small number of lies in 44 seconds. Did you know that Medicare Advantage is a "safety net" for seniors? Neither did I….

QUALITY/POLICY: Medpundit right on on cancer treatment

I didn’t get around to talking about the cancer treatment article in the NY Times last weekend, but Syd at Medpundit did. And I agree with her—we should be figuring out when to say no, heartbreaking though it is. Although buying a few extra months for a 35 year old mother in my mind is different from doing it for a 93 year old (even if he was President once). Look in the comments for a note from the subject of the NY Times article.

PODCAST: Fine art and healthcare–a conversation with David St Clair, MeDecision

A while back I got a rather unusual email from MEDecision– an interesting tech company I’ve interviewed before on THCB. It was actually quoting their CEO David St Clair who’d just seen Malcom Gladwell and it said this:

Picasso was able to produce his greatest masterpieces by the time he was in his
mid-twenties. After that, it seems the quality of his output leveled off, or may
have even dipped a bit. Cezanne was kind of the opposite. He learned from
trial-and-error and leveraged a half-century of life experience, development and
growth to create his best art after the age of 50. I think Mr. Gladwell is dead-on in his assessment that
proposals to fix our health care system can be categorized as taking either
Picasso or Cezanne approaches. Like Picasso, a lot of folks are focused on
finding that one, major, “big bang” idea that will comprehensively solve every
problem. While this methodology may work in certain circumstances (it certainly
worked for Picasso for awhile), I have to agree with Mr. Gladwell that health
care is far too large and complex a system for us to realistically think that
some monumental “burst of innovation” is going to cure its every ill and set it
back on course. No, my money is on the Cezanne approach. After 20 years in the
health information technology business, I truly feel that there isn’t a single
magical solution – even if Michael Moore seems to think there is. It’s got to be
a lot of little solutions building momentum toward larger, system-wide reform.
And we need to engage as many people as we can in the process and give them the
means and resources they need to keep trying new approaches that might work.
Like Cezanne, we need to build on our experiences and develop and grow our ideas
before we can expect the masterpiece to emerge.

As you might imagine, I’m not a fan of incremental piecemeal change in health care, even though I’m not in complete agreement with Michael Moore–whatever certain of my readers might think. And it’s not often that a health care tech company CEO goes off the tech-only reservation (so to speak)  So yesterday I had a long chat with David. It certainly was spirited, and I hope you’ll be interested in the outcome!

POLICY/INTERNATIONAL: John Cohn puts the boot in….nicely

I told John Cohn a while back that he was just too nice, and that he shouldn’t engage in the pointless argument with the free-marketeers about whether we treat cancer better or worse than the Europeans—especially as we do so much worse on many other measures. But John doesn’t listen to me—instead he takes the cancer argument and uses it to stamp all over the free-marketeers. At some point the referee should step in and stop this fight…

Meanwhile here’s the real problem. Next to John’s article on the CBS site is a video of Bush, and this is the text below it:

CBS News RAW: President Bush announced new proposals for the tax code intended to improve health care. His ideas counter Democratic proposals to nationalize the system.

Please could someone at CBS or anywhere else find me an example of a democrat wanting to “nationalize” the system. “Nationalize” means the government owning the production/service a la the Post Office or UK NHS. Not even Dennis Kucinich seems to be in favor of that. So what the hell are they talking about? I don’t know but neither do they. And, as they’re controlling a major news organization’s output, that is the problem.

POLICY: Great new site–Health08.org, and more on health IT in the election

Health08.org – Health care election news, analysis and events from KFF.

And it’s the baby of someone THCBers know and love but we can’t identify in public because the individual concerned used to have opinions, and KFF isn’t allowed to have them, let alone act on them—unlike the plethora of right wing think tanks that have been writing legislation in this country for the past 27 years.

Meanwhile Susan Blumenthal is back with her second in depth comparison of the election “positions” of the candidates regarding health care—this time focusing on health care IT.

POLICY: Lies, half-truths and irrelevancies in defense of mean-spirited politics

My spies tell me that this WSJ article by Bush adviser Allan Hubbard is packed with more half-truths per inch than even stuff emanating from AHIP. But I’ve lost my WSJ access, as as I won’t pay money to Mr Murdoch on principle –after what he did to NSW Rugby League–I can’t get only get the the first part unless I subscribe. Can someone send me the rest of the text?

As it turns out, the whole thing is a defense of the upcoming Veto for SCHIP renewal.

Continue reading…

assetto corsa mods