Categories

Tag: Hana Kahleova

Midlife Women Are Being Handed GLP-1s. Who Is Asking About Their Bones?

By HANA KAHLEOVA

Tuesday October 20th was World Osteoporosis Day, and one number deserves more attention than it gets: one in two women over 50 will break a bone because of osteoporosis. Bone loss speeds up as estrogen falls during menopause. Yet in the rush to treat midlife weight gain with the newest drugs, bones rarely come up.

I think of a patient who sat down and named the drug before she said anything else. She was in her early 50s, and she wanted a GLP-1, the weekly injection everyone seems to be on now. She had gained weight around her middle that nothing would touch, and she had not slept through the night in months. Two or three times a night she woke up soaked, kicked off the covers and lay awake. Two of her friends had started the drug that spring. She expected a prescription, not a conversation.

She is a composite of women I have treated, but her request is common. About one in five adults ages 50 to 64 have taken a GLP-1 drug, the highest share of any age group. Many are women looking for relief from the weight gain and broken sleep of the menopause transition.

They have good reason to want something that works. For generations, women’s menopause symptoms were minimized or left for them to endure. A drug that finally does something can feel like overdue respect. In a 15-minute visit, it is also the fastest thing a doctor can offer. That is not an unreasonable choice. The question is whether it should be the first one.

What changed my answer for this patient was a line already in her chart. A bone density scan the year before had shown osteopenia, the thinning that comes before osteoporosis. It had earned a note to keep an eye on it and then dropped out of the conversation, as these findings so often do.

Here is why it mattered. The weight people lose on GLP-1 drugs is not all fat. Across clinical trials of these medications, roughly a quarter of the weight lost was lean mass. In one retrospective study of patients taking semaglutide or tirzepatide, bone density at the hip fell by nearly 3% over about three years. For a woman already losing bone as estrogen declines, rapid weight loss lands on top of an existing deficit. And about half of patients stop semaglutide within a year, often regaining weight, so some pay that cost without keeping the benefit.

Continue reading…

Medicine Gave Itself a Code for Diabetes Remission. A Year Later, the Payment System Still Can’t See It.

By HANA KAHLEOVA

“Will this only get worse?”

Patients with type 2 diabetes have asked me some version of that question for my entire career. For most of it, the honest answer was “probably.” We treated diabetes as a one-way street: glucose climbs, medications pile up, complications follow. Good care slowed the slope. It didn’t reverse it.

A year ago today, that assumption stopped being true, at least on paper. On October 1, 2025, CMS added E11.A, “type 2 diabetes mellitus in remission,” to the ICD-10-CM code set. To use it, a clinician has to document an HbA1c below 6.5% for at least three months after a patient has stopped all glucose-lowering medication. That’s the definition the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, and Diabetes UK agreed on in 2021. “Well controlled” doesn’t count. The code exists to separate remission from management.

That’s a real concession. When CMS creates a code for an outcome, it is saying the outcome is real, measurable, and common enough to track.

The evidence behind it isn’t new. In DiRECT, a cluster-randomized trial run through ordinary UK primary care practices, 46% of participants in a structured weight-management program were in remission after a year, compared with 4% on usual care. About a third were still in remission at two years. These weren’t patients at an elite research center. They came from routine general practices. That’s what makes the result a policy question, not a curiosity.

So here’s the policy question. One year in, what has the code changed?

As far as payment and quality measurement go, almost nothing.

Continue reading…