Quality in Healthcare: Cultural Competence, Diagnostic Accuracy or Patronizing Insensitivity?


I sometimes tell patients “I work for the government”, but sometimes I say the opposite, “I work for you”.

Herein lies a dichotomy that is eating away at primary care in this country, like a slow growing cancer. I suspect everybody is aware of it, but it seems nobody has the inclination to deal with it.

2020 exposed how differently Americans view and prioritize things like personal freedom and public safety. We have also seen how vastly different perceptions of reality suddenly exist about what constitutes medical facts. Alternative facts and fake news are suddenly household concepts.

For years, American healthcare has paid lip service to ethnic and cultural sensitivity, as long as minority opinions or practices don’t clash too badly with the holy cows of western society. We tolerate circumcision in men, but not genital mutilation in women, for example. But we don’t even pay lip service to the majority’s right to direct their own healthcare.

Some people want to be screened for everything and some don’t. How heavy-handed should the healthcare system or individual providers be? If you buy a car and never bring it in for routine maintenance, isn’t that your personal choice, your personal freedom? Why should healthcare be completely different?

In bread and butter primary care, we are squeezed every day between patients’ requests for healthcare and the American quasi-religious medical quality dogma. The possibly well-meaning principles were set forth by CMS, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and turned into business opportunities for private health insurers and the many middlemen of the healthcare industry.

We disagree on whether mask wearing decreases the spread of the coronavirus and whether, even if it does, you can legally mandate it.

Yet medical providers have been routinely measured and financially rewarded for things like recommending aspirin use in middle aged people until it turned out that was faulty science. We have been mandated to do all kinds of things that have nothing to do with why people come to see us, because Uncle Sam (in the broadest sense of America’s paternalistic healthcare system) knows best what people need.

A patient smokes, feels depressed, has an elevated blood pressure and hasn’t had a screening colonoscopy. They also have this gnawing pain in the belly that six months later will turn out to be an inoperable pancreatic cancer. I can get 4 quality brownie points for clicking EMR boxes for smoking cessation counseling, scoring degree of depression and suggesting a behavioral health referral, advising salt and alcohol restriction and arranging for a blood pressure followup as well as referring my patient for a screening colonoscopy.

But there are no quality parameters or incentives for paying attention to this patient’s main concern, “Chief Complaint”, for making an early and correct diagnosis and saving the patient’s life.

Medical providers are disincentivized from listening to their patients because the screening opportunities have become the dominating purpose of primary care in the eyes of those in power.

People with new symptoms may have long waits to see their primary care providers, who are overburdened with screening and housekeeping duties. Doctors went to medical school, residencies and fellowships to learn how to diagnose and treat disease. We were never selected for or trained for the bookkeeping duties that are becoming the bulk of our work.

So much of what we do could be done by others, even digitally and remotely. It’s a new year in a shaken-up healthcare system in a shaken-up nation. It’s time to think about what we really need doctors to do.

Hans Duvefelt is a Swedish-born rural Family Physician in Maine. This post originally appeared on his blog, A Country Doctor Writes, here.

Categories: Uncategorized