“Meaningful Use” – If You Have to Define It, Is It?

BrianBaum I have a good friend at Duke University
– Dr. Ed Hammond.  (Ed has been involved in advancing electronic
health information for quite some time – probably longer than he'd like
to remember.)  Ed once told me that to get a perspective on how
long we – (our nation) has been assessing the potential of automating
health information you'd have to go back to the introduction of Medicare
in 1965 when President Johnson signed the legislation and officially
enrolled Harry Truman as the first Medicare beneficiary.

A provision of that legislation commissioned
the first study to evaluate the impact on the cost and quality of healthcare
relative to this emerging capability loosely referred to as “information
technology”.  I believe we can all readily admit that much has
changed since 1965, (even if we weren't around in 1965, or aware in
1965.)  For years the debate focused on standards, architecture,
common language, who/how do we pay for this automation, etc – many of
these debates certainly continue today.

The most recent addition to this dialogue
focuses on “meaningful use”.  I saw a press release out of
HHS last week announcing “Process begins to Define Meaningful Use
of Electronic Health Records”.   Now I have to preface my
comments by saying – I am an unwavering advocate of electronic health
information – a strong believer in the value for the individual health
consumer, as well as the greater good of managing health information
across populations.  There can be no doubt of the benefits of efficiently
managing health information with all of the benefits of our ever increasing
powers of information technology.  We can look virtually anywhere
in our lives, our economy to see the impact and benefit.

Now as we enter a period of public
comment on meaningful use – I'm struck by the irony of the very concept. 
Imagine a time long ago when the telephone was first invented. 
Prior to gaining land rights to string phone lines hearings had been
held on “meaningful use” of the telephone.  The debate likely
would have proceeded for years – “who are you going to call”? 
One telephone has no value, the value is in the network – how can we
ensure that a network is ever created?  Of course I'm oversimplifying
the comparison – but you can apply the concept to almost any innovation
– for the most part the innovation succeeds because it provides value,
solves problems, improves life in general.  Once the market validates
an innovation, government may well have a role in regulating to promote
some level of efficiency.  However, the reverse – seems more problematic
– government promulgating meaningful use and then turning it over to
the market to implement.

While I am hopeful that this latest
chapter will produce action, I am most encouraged by the growing recognition
of the role of the patient/consumer in the drive to automate health
information.  No one has more interest in their health history
or health future than the individual health consumer.  Physician
relationships may come and go, payer relationships are certainly transitional
– but the one constant is that most people want to be healthy and want
to live a long and healthy life.  Personal involvement in proactively
managing health is essential to this outcome.  As an industry,
we need to provide the tools and services and access to information
to consumers so that they can effectively manage their health – in collaboration
with all of their clinical resources.  That, I believe is meaningful
use – health information available where and when it can positively
impact the health of an individual and advance the quality of health
across the population.

Earlier this week an organization called
healthdatarights.org issued a “Declaration of Health Data Rights”. 
While the tenets of this declaration would normally be self evident
– I would suggest that this declaration be adopted and endorsed as a
foundation of our national drive to automate health information. 
Actions like this may finally represent the break-through that has eluded
us since those earliest days in 1965.

Brian Baum was the co-founder of
the Health Record Network launched by Duke University in 2003, and most
recently serves as the President of Stayhealthy.

Livongo’s Post Ad Banner 728*90

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as:

4
Leave a Reply

4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
OscarSherry Reynoldsnotthereerythropoeitin, md Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Oscar
Guest

This is interesting: “No one has more interest in their health history or health future than the individual health consumer. Physician relationships may come and go, payer relationships are certainly transitional – but the one constant is that most people want to be healthy and want to live a long and healthy life.” I agree 100%. The problem is that often, individuals are left out of the equation when it comes to these discussions. If the individual doesn’t happen to work in a related field, it is usually late in the decision making process –if at all– that he/she becomes… Read more »

Sherry Reynolds
Guest

It might help people who are new to the conversation to know that there are over 100 different EMR vendors and until very recently the vendors not only didn’t talk to one another they didn’t even talk to other customers with the same vendor. Epic for example (their CEO Judy Faulkner sits on one of the committees that is advising HHS on public policy for health IT) has their EMR at Kasier, Stanford and Palo Alto medical group but you can’t share the records electronically. Just this past year they finally came out with a new module you could install… Read more »

notthere
Guest
notthere

May be we need to look after democracy here before we tell other countries how to live. I’ve had enough of the posturing, lying, propaganda and hypocrisy. It’s time to hold feet to the fire. We’re not going to get the obvious, sensible and real solution to US healthcare which is single payer, (No, that doesn’t necessarily exclude private insurance.) combining Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, Federal, VA and the military, dumping all the unnecessarily different bureaucracies, and building a realtime medical IT system. The X-factor insurance costs. If any of our representatives and senators want to vote against a federally funded… Read more »

erythropoeitin, md
Guest
erythropoeitin, md

“That, I believe is meaningful use – health information available where and when it can positively impact the health of an individual and advance the quality of health across the population,” you say. Based on this, there are few, if any, commercially available units in the US that will enable meaningfully useful care. The vendors are short changing the docs and the patients. CCHIT certification, as configured, is a useless measure of computerrized HIT efficiency. Recently, a country in Europe geared up its national HIT system using HIT equipment that has not been in CCHIT’s good graces. This technology may… Read more »