Month: April 2009

The Hive Mind

Apr 2, 2009• 9

By JOHN HALAMKA

Over the past few years, I've radically redesigned my approach to
learning. In the past, I memorized information. Now, I need to be a
knowledge navigator, not a repository of facts. I've delegated the
management of facts to the "Hive Mind" of the internet. With Web 2.0,
we're all publishers and authors. Every one of us can be instantly
connected to the best experts, the most up to date news, and an exobyte
multimedia repository. However, much of the internet has no editor, so
the Hive Mind information is probably only 80% factual – the challenge
is that you do not know which 80%.

Here are few examples of my recent use of the Hive Mind as my auxiliary brain.

I
was listening to a 1970's oldies station and heard a few bars of a
song. I did not remember the song name, album or artist. I did remember
the words "Logical", "Cynical", "Magical". Entering these into a search
engine, I immediately retrieved Supertramp's Logical Song lyrics. With
the Hive Mind, I can now flush all the fragments of song lyrics from my
brain without fear.

On Clinical Groupware, Interoperability and the HITECH Bill

Apr 1, 2009• 6

By CHARLIE BIRMINGHAM

Was it not Aristotle who once remarked “Nature abhors a front end that is not connected to its backend?”

In his recent, insightful blog here on Clinical Groupware as an alternative “meaningful use” of IT under the Health Information Technology and Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), contained in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, David Kibbe commented that the primary purpose for using these IT systems is to “improve clinical care through communications and coordination involving a team of people, the patient included…in a manner that fosters accountability in terms of quality and cost.”

Yet it takes a “connected” health care ecosystem to make this kind of communication possible, and thus HITECH is replete with references to “interoperability” and “data exchange.” Indeed, the concepts of “meaningful use” and “interoperability” are inextricably linked in HITECH. For example, Section 4102 states that hospital incentive payments are dependent on demonstrating, “that during such period such EHR technology is connected in a manner that provides, in accordance with standards applicable to the exchange of information, for the electronic exchange of information to improve the quality of health care, such as promoting coordination of care.”

Holt accepts Beltway role, pledges new era of ‘personable responsibility’

Apr 1, 2009• 14

By JOHN IRVINE

In a dramatic reversal, THCB publisher Matthew Holt announced today that he has accepted a position with the Washington based CATO Institute, a think tank devoted to sober analysis and rigorous defense of the ideals of the modern conservative movement.

At CATO, Holt will hold the title of Distinguished Visiting British Policy Wonk. He is expected to deliver a series of entertaining lectures designed to warn conservative audiences of the dangers of encroaching big government and the evils of internationalism.

Tentative topics in the series, scheduled to be held at the Rottweiler Student Center at the American University are “What the Hell is Government, Anyway, Really, When You Think About it?” and “Regulation 2.0: Here We Go Again, This Guy Reminds Me of Jimmy Carter ..”

The appointment represents only the latest chapter in a personal voyage spanning three decades and six continents for Holt. In recent years the blogger and entrepreneur had become synonymous with cheeky criticism of the healthcare industry.

“It all started when I read that Ayn Rand book on a bumpy flight from San Francisco to Nashville,” Holt said. “At first, I thought I was going to be sick, then, in a moment of clarity, I became aware of my numerous internal contradictions. By the time I got off the plane I was composing a personable e-mail to Michael Cannon in my head .. ”

Officials at CATO said they were initially skeptical when Holt approached them with the idea that he join the institute, but gradually warmed to the idea, after thinking about it for a little while. “Frankly. we thought it was a bit odd,” said Institute spokesman Chet McClellan “Shit. I mean. Matthew Holt? But people change. Especially in Washington around stimulus package time. ”

In recent months, Holt had been among a number of candidates rumored to have been headed to a high profile role in the White House Office of New Economic Policy. (WHONEP). According to highly placed sources in the administration with an intimate knowledge of events, that lifelong dream came to an premature end last month after Holt offended first lady Michelle Obama with public comments denigrating the Obama Health care reform plan.

According to several witnesses who asked not to be identified, Mrs. Obama flew into an extended rage after learning that Holt had called Mr. Obama’s bold plan to radically reshape the broken US Healthcare System in three months using a handpicked team of people from Massachusetts quote “really silly.”

“Really silly? WTF? The man has a stupid english accent and he can’t spell.” Mrs Obama is reported to have said. “And he doesn’t fact check his blog posts.”

A White House spokesperson denied the incident ever took place.

Commentology > More On Natasha Richardson

Apr 1, 2009• 3

Dr. Cory Franklin dropped us a note in response to THCB contributor Sarah Arnquist’s piece on the controversy surrounding the death of British actress Natasha Richardson, “Leave Natasha Richardson Out of the Healthcare Debate.”

“I wrote the article and have been reluctant to respond to criticisms
but since I read your blog I will here. So many people, both sides, are
tied into their political beliefs about health care that virtually no
one is actually looking at the record as we know it and asking a quite
logical question.

1. Here’s what’s important- the facts of this case- check the 911
transcripts in the Globe and Mail. The paramedics document the patient
has a Glascow Coma Score of 12 upon arrival to the first hospital at
St. Agathe. That is the key. The medical literature is quite clear –
patients who present with scores in that range on presentation almost
always survive. Where are the Canadian neurosurgeons and trauma people
commenting on that? The questions that should be asked in light of that
are who made the diagnosis and when, who treated and when, and what was
the condition upon treatment. But it is clear that at 4 PM she was
neurologically intact enough to survive with the appropriate treatment.
By the way, this major ski resort is no further from Montreal than Vail
or Breck is from Denver. And the Canadian defenders talk about how
close it is by ambulance to minimize the medevac issue. You can’t have
it both ways.

Whose Data is it Anyway ?

Apr 1, 2009• 18

By DOUG KLINGER

As we know, the Federal Government is planning to spend $19 billion to help the healthcare system upgrade its 20th century, non-standard, paper-based and proprietary system-based health records systems to a more standardized, electronic solution which will empower the healthcare system and consumers alike. This may be a side benefit of electing our first Blackberry-toting commander-in-chief. But, it’s not clear that everyone is ready to get behind the President on this one.

The New York Times just published an article entitled “Doctors Raise Doubts on Digital Health Data”. The New England Journal of Medicine just published two articles outlining the challenges with making the electronic records dream a reality.

In a recent post on this blog entitled, “Better Records on Our Cars Than Ourselves“, we discussed the critical importance of better connecting consumers to the healthcare decision-making and delivery process. Without engaging consumers effectively, it will be difficult to drive meaningful changes in healthcare consumption, healthcare effectiveness and ultimately, healthcare cost.

While the recent flurry of media coverage on the subject of electronic health records points to many of the reasons why the Government’s plan cannot or will not succeed, let’s take a minute to focus on why it should succeed:

1. Health information belongs to the consumers whose health is in question. While the information may be generated by doctors and other members of the delivery system, it is generated on patients and generally paid for by the patients themselves or their insurers (private or government).

2. Patients can and should be able to access and share their health information. Is it really appropriate, as some have argued, for some doctors or other members of the delivery system to decide if we, as patients, are “qualified’ to have access to our own health information ?

3. Getting health records into a more standardized, usable and transferrable format will surely take time and cost a lot of money. One potential benefit of this investment of time and money may be a new partnership between those who deliver healthcare and those who consume heathcare. In an industry which is today characterized by battling between constituents over who gets what care and who pays for that care, a bit of partnership might go a long way. Cal it a pollyanna-ish view, but without a vision to make things better we are may well be destined to mediocrity.

Why not focus on what we can accomplish vs what we cannot ? Why not begin architecting a plan to migrate from reliance on proprietary systems and paper records to an open, electronic solution that brings healthcare information together vs keeping it in protected silos ?

In closing, as the New York Times and New England Journal articles discuss, it seems appropriate to debate how the new electronic information will be used to improve healthcare quality. But, this debate can proceed in parallel with an effort to make the information more readily available in the first place. Without substantive changes to how we collect, store and transfer health information, the healthcare quality debate may stay just that – a debate.

Doug Klinger serves on the board of MedCommons. Before joining MedCommons, spent ten years with CIGNA, where he served as CEO of CIGNA Dental, among other roles. His resume includes a stint with Monster.com, where he led the company’s North American unit.

Health 2.0 NYC Chapter, has meeting, needs a place!

Apr 1, 2009• 2

Health 2.0’s NYC chapter is having a meeting this Thursday 4/2–-around 50 people are due to attend and it’s set to be a great session.

There is one minor problem though. Due to a last minute cancellation by the existing conference room sponsor the meeting needs a new venue. Please contact eugeneATnyhto.org if you can fit ~40-50 people for tomorrow evening from 6.30pm on.

(Eugene does have a back up, but it’s not ideal! And no this is not an April Fool’s joke)

BIDMC, Google Health and the data transfer problem

Apr 1, 2009• 15

By Matthew Holt

e-Patient Dave on the real world issues of moving data around in health care. The punchline—claims-based data without dates is not very useful, which requires those using the aggregators (Google health et al) to do a whole lot more work.

A really, really important article. Go read.