Practice Fusion gets investment from Salesforce.com

Practice Fusion gets investment from Salesforce.com

21
SHARE

We’ve been keeping tabs on Practice Fusion since the early days and THCB regulars will have noticed several comments and an article from CMO Robert Rowley. CEO Ryan Howard’s been hinting for a while that they were going to be getting into bed with a major software player, that shared their SaaS approach, and today they announced an investment from Salesforce.com, who we also know has been sniffing around health care too. This will include Practice Fusion becoming part of the Force.com (kind of an app store for the Salesforce.com ecosystem, although my guess is that few physicians are going there right now to look for records (not sure they’re going to Wal-mart either, though)

Practice Fusion is claiming that 19,000 users are already on its system which includes basic practice management, as well as a pretty complex EMR workflow. Coming soon will be a greater ability to share information with patients and other physicians over the platform—which allows it to spread via viral marketing. i.e. I’m referring you this patient, click here to get their data and sign up for this free EMR too. It’s not yet CCHIT certified, but Howard is aiming to be eligible for “meaningful use” money when the criteria are finally established.

I’m not too sure what SalesForce is getting other than a financial investment, as the extension from sales CRM to physician clinical workflow isn’t that obvious, but perhaps there are other behind the scenes activities going on there.

And of course the whole thing is funded by contextualized ads, which appear to the right of the screen in a similar manner to Google Adwords, but are of course targeted at a much more valuable population. Yup, with Practice Fusion we are finding out that free may just be cheap enough.

Leave a Reply

21 Comments on "Practice Fusion gets investment from Salesforce.com"


Guest
Isabella
Jan 5, 2014
Guest
rdg
Sep 28, 2010

I’ve started using practice fusion and I kind of like it. You can pay 100.00 bucks to get it w/o ads. Right now, we are being forced to use an EMR. They will give us 44000 dollars for this experiment. I can’t see myself investing in another Medinotes/allscripts fiasco. If they are lying about HIPPA compliance then it is also possible that a whole bunch of local server based ehrs are keeping pt data in hardrives w/o encryption. Everyone is suspect. They will give me my data for fre if I request it in excel format so I my risk is low. I’ve lost more data from hard drive crashes than my simple hotmail account. It may be worth giving it a try. I might even pocket the 44000 dollars and if the process fails, well, I’m not gouged by another vendor again…

Guest
Jun 29, 2010

THIS IS NOT SPAM!!! Please Take our Survey!!!
http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22AUMJHAHPJ
This survey is being administered by a group of University of Connecticut alumni to help promote the advancement of technology in the fitness industry. By participating, you will help shape the design of future products and enable manufacturers and designers to provide you with solutions better suited to your needs. This survey will require approximately 5-10 minutes to complete depending on how you answer some of the questions. Your answers will be held strictly confidential and will only be analyzed in the aggregate. To say thank you, we will give you the opportunity to enter your email address at the end of the survey for a chance to win a $50 Amazon.com gift card!
Your participation is extremely important to us. We guarantee not to spam or share your contact information with any other parties.
Thank you for your participation!

Guest
JR
Aug 27, 2009

Here is what Mickey Tripathi (who’s model ONC Is following now apparently) said about practice fusion on this very blog a while back.
“Practice Fusion, a San-Francisco-based startup is its hyper-commercial opposite. Launched last August, the company’s original plan was to offer their EHR without charge in return for access to the deidentified clinical data generated by users, which the company would sell to pharma companies, insurers, and researchers. If that isn’t controversial enough, the company announced last Friday that they’ll be partnering with Google’s advertising arm, AdSense, to put context-sensitive ads on the EHR in real-time.”

Guest
NoVA doc
Aug 9, 2009

@MG: could please you link/list the other SaaS vendors? I would like to see a company with its finances as well as its long-term priorities straight when evaluating these products. Logician Internet getting shut down by GE comes to mind. I suspect the hype about the salesforce.com investment is to quell those doubts.
PracticeFusion has a $100/month tier for supported/ad-free version. An interesting option for a small practice with computer-savvy practitioners with its available billing and scheduling modules. Have yet to log-in to see if there’s a future development road map of features I can’t readily find: eRx, LIS, portal, exchange with other EHR’s/PHRs.

Guest

When I interviewed Practice Fusion’s CEO a few months back for the Health Business Blog he told me they made money from their billing service. To me that seems like more of a money spinner than ads.
http://www.healthbusinessblog.com/?p=2256

Guest
MD as HELL
Aug 6, 2009

EHR Guy,
I’ve been at my same “opportunity” for 27 years. The powers that be buy every system that comes down the line from Pyxys (another boondoggle) to Cisco phones to you name it. We don’t have a nice bridge yet.
I will remain at my “opportunity” because other places tend to be worse. I may be MD as HELL, but here I make a difference. As for where, I will remain anonymous.
I have heard that A4, now owned by Allscripts, is much better.

Guest
MG
Aug 6, 2009

There are already several smaller SaaS EMR vendors that are CCHIT-certified and I would have to see some of the details of this deal to see what it really meant for Practice Fusion and their offerings. Is Salesforce.com just take a very minor equity stake that basically provides additional cash for Practice Fusion or are they also providing more tangible assets including data center resources or support resources?

Guest
Aug 6, 2009

MD as HELL,
What hospital do you work at?
I suggest you seek a new opportunity. It sounds like your are very unsatisfied and mad as hell! :)
On a more serious tone: What software would you recommend?
Thanks,
The EHR Guy

Guest
MD as HELL
Aug 6, 2009

Meditech is terrible as a patient care tool. It is not user friendly. It dumbs nursing down to useless. It is archaic and cumbersome and it is s..l..o..w.
The older version was actually better than the new version we just installed, over the objections of the medical staff.
It is inflexible and, compared to a modern web page, it is a proprietary, expensive, and hurts productivity. After it was turned on our length of stay in the ED increased by nearly an hour.
The company is not very responsive.
It is popular with admin because it does what they need, perhaps, but taking care of patients with it is burdensome.
Don’t buy it.

Guest
Aug 6, 2009

e-Patient Dave,
Of course I am not with them or with any other HIS vendor.
I’ve simply performed consulting services for hospitals for implementing innovative technologies (e.g. CCOW, SSO, etc.) where they have MEDITECH installed. It has staying power. It is most widely installed software in the inpatient setting. Users that I have corresponded with don’t have anything too negative to say.
I’ve also been in hospitals where they have attempted to install new powerful web based solutions and the users rejected them in favor of continuing with their old software.
I try to speak facts and not opinions. And I’m really only a fan of the software that I develop. :) Modesty pushed to the side for a minute.
Thanks,
The EHR Guy

Guest
Aug 6, 2009

Yo, EHR Guy: I gotta run (late for work again), but at some point I wanna know more about Meditech. Do they have an animated online demo or some such?
How come everyone doesn’t buy it? Misguided buying priorities? (Honest question – I have no info and no opinion.)
Fwiw, re “stick to one industry” – I understand your point, but there are limits to that logic. It would say, for instance, that IBM and Cisco and GE should stay out of HC, yes? (No?) Seems to me (in my 2/3-ignorant state) that we need *more* innovative competition. And it’s fine with me if Meditech wins every face-off!
(Knowing you, I presume you’re not involved with Meditech, right? Except as a fan?)

Guest

Chris Anderson, in his new book, “Free: The Future of a Radical Price”, Hyperion (July 7, 2009), says that the alternative revenue is coming from selling charts to medical associations that do research. Not sure what that means, but he says that each chart can fetch between $50 and $500 and can be sold multiple times to various institutions that do these studies (page 104).
Pretty clever idea.

Guest
Aug 5, 2009

Wendell,
I don’t think it can be solely funded by contextual ads.
I consulted for a now very succesful startup, which I can’t mention it’s name because of an NDA, which attempted to use contextual ads to create revenue. After carefully studying statistics and obtaining advice from experts the number of registered users to be able to create income that would be significant to produce through these ads was around the 6 million mark. Daunting task!
They must have another model for alternative income streams.
Anyways, I’ve been using Internet almost since its inception. I have never clicked on an ad. When I want to buy something I go to wherever I deem fit.
Also, if a product is good people will buy it. There is no need to give away something good for free. It may just be a marketing strategy. Give away today and tomorrow will make it up somehow. Even Microsoft gives their software away for 120 days.
Thanks,
The EHR Guy

Guest
Aug 5, 2009

“the whole thing is funded by contextualized ads”
Very bad idea for an EMR to have any type of advertising. PracticeFusion of course is not the only vendor using that technique for funding.
I originally thought it a bad idea for even this weblog to have advertising, but have changed my mind on that. It’s non-intrusive and this is a completely different setting that for an EMR system.