The American Medical Association this week began a television ad campaign, lambasting Republican Senators who failed to prevent the July 1 automatic 10.6 percent Medicare physician fee cut.

In the one-minute ad, AMA President Nancy Nielsen says, "A group of Senators decided it was more important to protect the health insurers than seniors."

Just as Robert Laszewski predicted here last week, the doctors are coming out in full lobbying force.

But wait. The Association of Health Insurance Plans is also running ads filled with nice looking seniors saying that to protect seniors Congress must protect the Medicare Advantage program.

Who is a senior taking 10 prescription medications for six chronic diseases with a calendar full of doctor’s appointments to believe?

Here are the ads.

Share on Twitter

3 Responses for “AMA and AHIP go head to head with TV ads”

  1. mgraps says:

    I’m not sure that AMA video is the TV ad – that’s more Nielsen’s message to AMA members.

  2. mgraps says:

    I think this is the AMA ad (the NH version, at least): http://ondemand.streamernet.net/amamedia/PicnicNH.wmv
    mg

  3. jd says:

    It’s too bad that Private Fee For Service (PFFS) Medicare Advantage, which has nothing to recommend it from a public interest perspective, has begun to tarnish the reputation of standard Medicare Advantage. The traditional program needs some tweaking, but is basically sound and adds value both in additional care management services and additional benefits. For years a few HMOs were able to maintain Medicare enrollees and provide additional services at no additional cost to the government. But even if there is a small additional cost, that may be justified as well.
    If an HMO has to take in a dollar or more in additional premiums (over and above traditional Medicare) in order to reduce the member expense by a dollar, then I think we can all agree that this is an unfair situation. Essentially, the government is providing people with an additional subsidy just to join a private health plan and there is no value added from the health plan. However, if there is a multiplier effect then that changes the situation. In some cases, I think almost all of us would agree that it’s fair for CMS to pay more for the HMO. For example, if CMS paid Medicare Advantage plans on average $500 more per member than it pays for the traditional program, but the out-of-pocket costs are $1,000 less on average per member, then isn’t this a good deal? Assuming that the quality and access to care are the same, shouldn’t the government out of public interest encourage people to join the private plans in that case?
    I am sure that analyses have been done to determine the return on investment of additional investments in Medicare Advantage, though I don’t recall seeing any.
    However, it’s clear that the new PFFS will not show a good return on investment. Care management is minimal. FFS payment is used just like traditional Medicare so that incentives are screwed up in the same way regarding under-utilization of preventive care and over-utilization of high-end specialist care. On top of that, private plans have additional sales and marketing and other admin costs, and on top of that there is the need to bring a profit. PFFS is a money-making scheme that returns less than a dollar in benefits for every additional dollar in premium. It’s a boondoggle of a program that deserves to die, and will die. AHIP would be wise not to expend political and financial capital defending it, particularly now that Democrats are poised to make big gains. Democrats know that the point of PFFS was to privatize Medicare generally, and there is a bull’s eye painted on it. By defending it, AHIP just increases the determination of Democrats to slash Medicare Advantage in a case of guilt by association.

Leave a Reply

FROM THE VAULT

The Power of Small Why Doctors Shouldn't Be Healers Big Data in Healthcare. Good or Evil? Depends on the Dollars. California's Proposition 46 Narrow Networking
MASTHEAD STUFF

MATTHEW HOLT
Founder & Publisher

JOHN IRVINE
Executive Editor

JONATHAN HALVORSON
Editor

JOE FLOWER
Contributing Editor

MICHAEL MILLENSON
Contributing Editor

ALEX EPSTEIN
Director of Digital Media

MICHELLE NOTEBOOM Business Development

MUNIA MITRA, MD
Clinical Medicine

Vikram Khanna
Editor-At-Large, Wellness

THCB FROM A-Z

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
@THCBStaff

WHERE IN THE WORLD WE ARE

The Health Care Blog (THCB) is based in San Francisco. We were founded in 2004 by Matthew Holt and John Irvine.

MEDIA REQUESTS

Interview Requests + Bookings. We like to talk. E-mail us.

BLOGGING
Yes. We're looking for bloggers. Send us your posts.

STORY TIPS
Breaking health care story? Drop us an e-mail.

CROSSPOSTS

We frequently accept crossposts from smaller blogs and major U.S. and International publications. You'll need syndication rights. Email a link to your submission.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR

Op-eds. Crossposts. Columns. Great ideas for improving the health care system. Pitches for healthcare-focused startups and business.Write ups of original research. Reviews of new healthcare products and startups. Data-driven analysis of health care trends. Policy proposals. E-mail us a copy of your piece in the body of your email or as a Google Doc. No phone calls please!

THCB PRESS

Healthcare focused e-books and videos for distribution via THCB and other channels like Amazon and Smashwords. Want to get involved? Send us a note telling us what you have in mind. Proposals should be no more than one page in length.

HEALTH SYSTEM $#@!!!
If you've healthcare professional or consumer and have had a recent experience with the U.S. health care system, either for good or bad, that you want the world to know about, tell us about it. Have a good health care story you think we should know about? Send story ideas and tips to editor@thehealthcareblog.com.

REPRINTS Questions on reprints, permissions and syndication to ad_sales@thehealthcareblog.com.

WHAT WE COVER

HEALTHCARE, GENERAL

Affordable Care Act
Business of Health Care
National health policy
Life on the front lines
Practice management
Hospital managment
Health plans
Prevention
Specialty practice
Oncology
Cardiology
Geriatrics
ENT
Emergency Medicine
Radiology
Nursing
Quality, Costs
Residency
Research
Medical education
Med School
CMS
CDC
HHS
FDA
Public Health
Wellness

HIT TOPICS
Apple
Analytics
athenahealth
Electronic medical records
EPIC
Design
Accountable care organizations
Meaningful use
Interoperability
Online Communities
Open Source
Privacy
Usability
Samsung
Social media
Tips and Tricks
Wearables
Workflow
Exchanges

EVENTS

TedMed
HIMSS South x South West
Health 2.0
WHCC
AHIP
AHIMA
Log in - Powered by WordPress.