On the front page of Today’s Wall Street Journal is an article entitled, “Medical Specialties Hit by a Growing Pay Gap”.

A few passages worth thinking about:

"Many in health-policy circles have focused on how the current health-care payment system is helping create shortages among primary-care doctors, internists and others on the front lines of medicine. But often lost is how the system is endangering some of the country’s most highly trained specialties as well."

And later…

"… Medicare implemented a new system to set standard fees for physicians’ services and procedures. The system’s aims were to clamp down on prices and, ironically, narrow the disparity between the bread-and-butter office visit and more-expensive specialty procedures. (emphasis mine) Over time, private insurers have taken their cue from Medicare to set their reimbursements, too."

And one more…

"Medicare officials say the government program tries to address cost disparities by continually reviewing its fee schedule but says it relies a lot on medical-specialty societies to raise such issues."

"We want to make sure that payment is appropriate and that includes not underpaying," says Terrence Kay, senior adviser to the director of the Center for Medicare Management.

3 Responses for “WSJ analyzes specialist pay”

  1. rbaer says:

    I wouldn’t necessarily say that these (sub-) specialists are underpaid (maybe some of them, esp. in costly metrpolitan areas) … just that some surgical and “procedural” specialties are greatly OVERpaid. I do not see a reason why so many physicians make 10x the average US household income. Of course, this pales in comparison to excesses in CEO compensation.

  2. Mike says:

    Wouldn’t implementing a value-based payment system instead of a procedural-based payment system eliminate most of the screwed up incentives mentioned in this article?
    If physicians are rewarded more generously for performing expensive technologically advanced procedures, of course they will migrate to specialties that do so.

  3. Peter says:

    “We want to make sure that payment is appropriate and that includes not underpaying,”
    So how does that control costs? Medicare is fighting a loosing battle trying to operate in a money driven system while trying to contain expenses. It isn’t going to happen.

Leave a Reply

MASTHEAD


Matthew Holt
Founder & Publisher

John Irvine
Executive Editor

Jonathan Halvorson
Editor

Alex Epstein
Director of Digital Media

Munia Mitra, MD
Editor, Business of Healthcare

Laura Montini
Associate Editor

Cindy Williams
Associate Editor

Michael Millenson
Contributing Editor











© THCB 1995-2012
WRITE FOR US

We're looking for bloggers. Send us your posts.

If you've had a recent experience with the U.S. health care system, either for good or bad, that you want the world to know about, tell us.

Have a good health care story you think we should know about? Send story ideas and tips to tips@thehealthcareblog.com.

ADVERTISE

Want to reach a dedicated audience of healthcare insiders and industry observers? THCB reaches a monthly audience of 100,000 movers and shakers. We reach a total circulation of roughly 450,000. Find out about advertising options here.

Questions on reprints, permissions and syndication to ad_sales@thehealthcareblog.com.

THCB CLASSIFIEDS

Reach a super targeted healthcare audience with your text ad. Target physicians, health plan execs, health IT and other groups with your message.
ad_sales@thehealthcareblog.com
WORK FOR US:

Interested in the intersection of healthcare, technology and business? We're looking for talented interns to work in our San Francisco offices. Get in touch.

Wordpress guru? We're looking for a part time web-developer to help take THCB to the next level. Drop us a line.
SEND US STUFF:

THCB
350 Townsend Street #403
San Francisco, California 94107

Other stuff you can do:

Subscribe to our RSS feed

Follow us on Twitter

Like us on Facebook