NEW @ THCB PRESS: Surviving Workplace Wellness. Spring 2014. Al Lewis and Vik Khanna. e-book edition. # LIGHTHOUSE Healthcare. Illuminated.

Michael Cannon at Cato picks up on David Leonhardt’s NYT article about error/process reporting in hospitals and suggests that there’s no need for regulation, as the market is getting us there already.

Hmm… methinks Michael underestimates what one economist he does approve of suggests identifies as a major problem. People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices” He may think that this has only been going on since 2002 or thereabouts but Codman was trying and failing to get transparency in hospitals in 1910! If we’re going to wait for the industry to really do this by itself to respond to Smith’s invisible hand, then as an economist Michael probably doesn’t have quite such a high regard for once said, in the long run, we are all dead!. Codman certainly has been pushing up daisies for a more than 60 years.

Share on Twitter

1 Response for “POLICY/QUALITY/HOSPITALS: Keynsian reporting trumps Smith-ian invisibilty”

  1. jd says:

    Cannon managed to get both the economics and the article wrong. The NYTimes piece did not “point out that the market is moving to fix that problem without government direction.” Instead, it referred explicitly to the Pennsylvania mandates and nowhere suggested that the pressure to report was coming from the market rather than regulators/legislators.
    And for good reason, because it would be stupid to ignore the initiatives in New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and a host of other states on hospital reporting. It would also be stupid to ignore CMS’s new mandates on transparency, and the threat of new mandates to come from federal and state government.
    And to the extent that pressure is coming from “the market” rather than government, it is coming primarily from stakeholders other than hospitals (payers and purchasers).
    Final point: payers, purchasers and public interest groups often lobby the government to improve provider quality data when the realize they can’t be as effective using “the market” alone. Government does not act sui generis, but in conjunction with stakeholders in the market.

Leave a Reply


Matthew Holt
Founder & Publisher

John Irvine
Executive Editor

Jonathan Halvorson

Alex Epstein
Director of Digital Media

Munia Mitra, MD
Chief Medical Officer

Vikram Khanna
Editor-At-Large, Wellness

Maithri Vangala
Associate Editor

Michael Millenson
Contributing Editor

About Us | Media Guide | E-mail | 415.562.7957 | Support THCB
© THCB 2005-2013

We're looking for bloggers. Send us your posts.

If you've had a recent experience with the U.S. health care system, either for good or bad, that you want the world to know about, tell us.

Have a good health care story you think we should know about? Send story ideas and tips to


Want to reach an insider audience of healthcare insiders and industry observers? THCB reaches 500,000 movers and shakers. Find out about advertising options here.

Questions on reprints, permissions and syndication to


Reach a super targeted healthcare audience with your text ad. Target physicians, health plan execs, health IT and other groups with your message.

Interested in the intersection of healthcare, technology and business? We're looking for talented interns to work in our San Francisco offices. Get in touch.

Wordpress guru? We're looking for a part time web-developer to help take THCB to the next level. Drop us a line.


If you'd like to be considered for our Blogroll, drop us an email and we'll take a look. While you're at it, why not add us to yours?

Let us know about a glitch or a technical problem.

Report spam or abuse here.

Sign up for the THCB Reader here.
Log in - Powered by WordPress.